Nice write up OP. I have two questions...what are OG's (I know OG stands for Original Gangsters) is that what everyone is referring too? And number two. Jimmy Hyams has the reputation of reporting everything late, but people think he's getting news first on this?
Original Grudenites. The posters who have been posting info/rumors on Gruden since the first thread, which started around the Akron or UGA week timeframe I believe.
What is the earliest date that Gruden can take a head coaching job (NFL or college) and still receive the 1.1 million dollars from his ESPN contract?
Hehe, thanks bud. I appreciate it. I'm actually surprised there's been as many folks agreeing with what we're putting out there as there are. You got a lot of harsh feedback initially, but I think that was largely in part to the raw emotion people were feeling when they started believing this "couldn't" really happen, after getting their hopes up so high.
Unlike a lot of those folks, I've been very speculative and hesitant about this whole ordeal until the Free Press article came out, and moreso, the response from it. Like I said earlier, silence speaks more than words. And the silence from every key player involved, mixed with the brash words from everyone not truly involved, says more than anything. I've seen these things play out a few times. This isn't my first rodeo, to say the least.
I'm keeping the faith, lowering my emotional attachment, and just looking at the evidence. And in doing so, I'm more confident than ever (when most folks were promising it was a done deal, that was when I was most doubtful) that this will happen. It makes too much sense
everyone should read tfp article by hargis yesterday. gruden out came from utad to knoxville media. jimmy stanton- no comment on the search.Look, I'm not going to try to persuade anyone to subscribe to the Macgruder theory, but it does offer a coherent explanation of events that lends itself to message board debate for those truly interested in debating - and isn't that why we're here?
Allow me to add one thought to expand upon Mr. Macgruder's position - return, if you will, to the Mike and Mike non-denial denial. I don't pretend to be an expert on football, football coaches, or football coach searches, but I do know a thing or two about preparing people for media interviews and Gruden's response to the questioning from M&M was a clanging wrong note in an otherwise believable symphony of speculation. That was the most inept, unprepared, and overtly disingenuous response from a seasoned media-type that I've ever heard. In short, it was the response of a person caught with his hand in the proverbial cookie jar.
If the idea of coaching the Vols was a "fantasy" as Gruden's agent would have us believe, then it would have been easy enough for Gruden to take that opportunity to set us all straight. He did not do so.
And, so, we are left with one irrefutable FACT: the only words we have from the man himself about whether he will be the one to lead the Vols back to football relevancy, were a stumbling collection of inconclusive babble. Ask yourself why, and then make the answer to that question the central factor around which you base your opinion.
When you're wrong then will you give all of us calling you crazy since the beginning about Gruden kudos?
I actually feel sorry for you.MacGruder, have you ever heard that one before? I know I sure haven't....
Look, if we're wrong, we'll both own up. But this is better than anything else we've got out there. At least in our world, we're still getting Gruden, as opposed to some second rate coach like Golden or Strong.
If I was anyone else, I'd be hoping me and MacGruder was right, instead of trying to bash us. We've put out two very thought out posts that of course are not fact, but are very possible and even probable scenarios. We're refusing to be puppets of a media that is not telling the whole truth. If they were, then why were they ALL saying different things, but the theme was the same? Doesn't make sense.