Manafort Trial Thread

[0nelilreb]

Of course I would. Potential jurors are obligated to tell the truth during jury selection. No one, on either side of the political divide, should hide a preexisting opinion or agenda from the Court or the parties.

LOL!!! Obligated to tell the truth while the prosecutor and or defense attorneys put on their dog and pony shows , lying but not lying to them .

 

[lawgator1]

LOL!!! Obligated to tell the truth while the prosecutor and or defense attorneys put on their dog and pony shows , lying but not lying to them .

Huh?

 

[TennTom]

Seems the question posed to the judge is "what happens when we can't come to a consensus on one single count?" That doesn't sound good for Paulie.

 

[Mick]

Here comes the excuses.

Wonder what excuses you will come up with when Mueller goes 6-0?

 

[Mick]

Seems the question posed to the judge is "what happens when we can't come to a consensus on one single count?" That doesn't sound good for Paulie.

The Redhats have gone dark after that revelation.

 

[Stew Cook]

Wonder what excuses you will come up with when Mueller goes 6-0?

It's a sham... Golf club fee dispute, obviously

 

[evillawyer]

Seems the question posed to the judge is "what happens when we can't come to a consensus on one single count?" That doesn't sound good for Paulie.

That's ambiguous. Do they mean they can't reach an agreement on any count, or they've reached agreement on all but one?

 

[DancingOutlaw]

The Redhats have gone dark after that revelation.

Lol this thread went from Trump has poisoned the jury to Manafort is toast in about three hours. What’s it like to be this manic all the time?

 

[Stew Cook]

That's ambiguous. Do they mean they can't reach an agreement on any count, or they've reached agreement on all but one?

Good question, indeed.

 

[TennTom]

That's ambiguous. Do they mean they can't reach an agreement on any count, or they've reached agreement on all but one?

Guess it was ambiguous to the judge who sent a note back.

 

[Mick]

That's ambiguous. Do they mean they can't reach an agreement on any count, or they've reached agreement on all but one?

They have agreed on 17 counts is the way I take it.

 

[evillawyer]

They have agreed on 17 counts is the way I take it.

I initially read it as they could not agree on any count. But I think the use of "single" does suggest you have the right reading.

 

[Mick]

Lol this thread went from Trump has poisoned the jury to Manafort is toast in about three hours. What’s it like to be this manic all the time?

Thanks for Representing the Redhats. I was worried about you.

 

[TennTom]

Who cares about the 18th count? Nail the criminal bastard to the wall.

 

[Stew Cook]

My question is how long will POTUS wait to issue a pardon, if the verdicts do, in fact come down as guilty?

 

[Mick]

My question is how long will POTUS wait to issue a pardon, if the verdicts do, in fact come down as guilty?

After the midterms.

 

[hog88]

Wonder what excuses you will come up with when Mueller goes 6-0?

Forfeits don't count.

 

[hog88]

Seems the question posed to the judge is "what happens when we can't come to a consensus on one single count?" That doesn't sound good for Paulie.

You're assuming they've found him guilty on the rest.

 

[0nelilreb]

My question is how long will POTUS wait to issue a pardon, if the verdicts do, in fact come down as guilty?

Why would he pardon him on white collar crimes That goes back 10 years ?

 

[Stew Cook]

Why would he pardon him on white collar crimes That goes back 10 years ?

He pardoned Martha Stewart.

 

[volfanhill]

Might be a pedo ring at PF Changs?

I have to admit I laughed

 

[TennTom]

You're assuming they've found him guilty on the rest.

Keep the faith, Hog. Pull out your 4 leaf clover, your rabbit's foot, your horseshoe, hover over your wishing well, pray to the mojo man, Hell, believe in that voodoo lady who tells your fortune by squeezing the goat's testicles (ode to Carlin). You know what''s coming.

 

[0nelilreb]

He pardoned Martha Stewart.

For obstruction of justice .

 

[Mick]

Why would he pardon him on white collar crimes That goes back 10 years ?

When the teacher told you there is no such thing as a stupid question, she told her friend what you asked and they laughed.

 

[0nelilreb]

When the teacher told you there is no such thing as a stupid question, she told her friend what you asked and they laughed.

When my liberal teacher told me things I knew were stupid I reminded her that age doesn’t equal wisdom .