Marjorie Taylor Greene Receives Standing Ovation From Repubs. Dems Vote To Remove Her From Two Committees

#251
#251
Vol Main said:
She has the right to represent the people who elected her and say what she believes. If those beliefs are wildly false fabrications with criminal intent, then others have a right to disapprovingly say so and correctly demand investigation and prosecution. The woman in on the lunatic fringe, and she appears to be homicidal.
Click to expand...
Right, we can trust your word on what’s criminal and not when you have already decided Trump is guilty of a crime that he did not commit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77, loggervol and AM64
#255
#255
AM64 said:
Yep, Ilhan Omar is certainly an idiot elected by idiots. Not only that, they doubled down and did it again. You can't fix stupid.
Click to expand...
Nice. I did the same thing only said AOC. I thought about mentioning Oman as well but figured the point was made so I was glad to scroll down and see you did it!
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#257
#257
GSD82 said:
Interesting seeing all the so called Republicans and Libertarians here bash Greene and yet have never said a word about the squad or the one banging a Chinese spy.
Click to expand...

Your dementia is getting worse, you forgot to repeat that biden is a communist or socialist.
 
#258
#258
When will every dem be removed for believing and pushing a crazy Russian hoax for 5 years?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#260
#260
lawgator1 said:
The rank and file Republican House members ought to be mad at McCarthy. He should have acted on this and not put them in this position to begin with. Even yesterday after the caucus he seemed nervous and uncertain. Not much of a leader. Not strong and decisive.
Click to expand...

This is the system of appeasement the weak republican party has held and allowed drumpf to be drumpf.
 
#271
#271
golfballs said:
The 11 Republicans voting with Democrats to remove Rep. Greene from committee assignments:
-M. Diaz-Balart (FL)
-B. Fitzpatrick (PA)
-C. Gimenez (FL)
-J. Katko (NY)
-Y. Kim (CA)
-A. Kinzinger (IL)
-N. Malliotakis (NY)
-C. Jacobs (NY)
-M. Salazar (FL)
-C. Smith (NJ)
-F. Upton (MI)
Click to expand...


Nicole Malliotakis Adds an Asterisk on Her Vote to Remove Greene from Committees

Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY) was one of just 11 Republicans to vote in favor of the successful resolution to remove the controversial Rep. Marjorie Taylore Greene (R-GA) from her assigned committees, including the House Education and Labor Committee, and the House Budget Committee. The final tally was 230-199.

de3c5958-0ec1-4276-b890-ace139eba477.jpg


But while Malliotakis was on board with this ousting, she added an asterisk to her vote. Now that they've done right on their side of the aisle, according to the congresswoman, she argues that it's time for the Democrats to do the same and vote out a couple of their own controversial characters from their respective committees. Namely, Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) for his ties to a suspected Chinese spy, and Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), who's been known to make anti-Semitic comments.

Nicole Malliotakis Adds an Asterisk on Her Vote to Remove Greene from Committees
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77
#272
#272
Kristy* said:
Quotes? How did he specifically direct his message to the mentally unstable? What did he say specifically that caused an insurrection? When did he tell people to storm the Capitol? I've listened. Have you? If that's your interpretation, that's on you. It wasn't just my interpretation, the capitol was damaged and people killed by drumpsters. This is "not on me" because, I am not protecting the guilty.

He felt the election was not conducted fairly, and his assertions are not without merritt. Speaking up isn't a crime. It didn't use to be anyway.
Click to expand...

I can make the short argument but something tells me that you are too deep and unable to look at this with an open mind. If you want to placate to a insurrectionist that wants to stop democracy then keep doing your mental gymnastics. If you can look/research with at least a relatively open mind then you can at least understand the argument. My goal is not to convince anyone but they should at least understand the argument is valid, unless you are blind follower.

None of this will make sense to you unless you can agree to number 1.

1. The election was fair and at least as accurate as any election we have ever had. If you are truly delusional enough or mentally unstable enough to think this elections is "stolen" then stop reading because you will not understand. Not everyone that believes the elections is stolen is mentally unstable, however, some are and the "proof" of that is all the Qer's in rehab or counseling. Do you honestly think Elizabeth from Knoxville is mentally stable?

Drumpf led an unprecedented campaign since 2015 that if he losses then elections are fraudulent. Back in 2015 Drumpf was asked the question "Will you accept any election result"? He said "No" and I do not blame him for that. No candidate should accept any result but they should accept a proper result within reason. Although a little cry baby I don't mind his legal challenges. Once all of that is finished then Drumpf is a loser and needs to concede. Not continue the lie that this election is stolen. Drumpf is responsible for indoctrinating his followers for years on the idea that American elections are fraudulent, with no evidence, none.

The steady diet of lies and deception were preached by drumpf leading up to and after the election. You said you have seen the speeches and possibly the tweeters. The culmination was the rally at the Capitol. RG spoke and made the point that this is "trial by combat". Not Drumpf's words but drumpf stood on the same stage that day and said RG "did a great job, has guts, real guts and fights."

Drumpf's words about VP Pence "if mike pence does the right thing then we win the election." More drumpf, " all he(Pence) needs to do is send it back to the states". He sets the stage for immediacy. now. All of which are incorrect, unconstitutional lies but also adds a sense of urgency.

"We gather in our capitol city for one simple reason to save our democracy." Again, speaking to the immediacy. Also, how could democracy be saved? You know the answer, it played out on national t.v. " I wanna go back 8 weeks and get this right because we are going to have someone who is not supposed to be in there and our country will be destroyed and we will not stand for that". How are they not going to stand for destruction of their country? You know the answer, it played out on national t.v. There are more examples but like you said, " I've listened".

Very simple bottom line, drumpf fired them up, for years then told them "stop the steal", "And we're going to have to fight much harder.", "we gonna walk down,(to the capitol) and I will be there with you".

After drumpf's words, five people are dead and a defaced capitol building and an attempt at destroying democracy failed.

.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top