Overall I tend to disagree with the bolded sentence. In some ways I think much of our society is actually seduced by technology and the thought that it improves a person's life - the consumption aspect. The thought of a new device whether it be a new phone or related tech doesn't seem to turn people against tech at all.
Medicine gets iffy - particularly attitudes like anti vaxxers; some of that is driven by religious beliefs, but I don't think it extends to the majority. It's much more likely to be the endless studies that say eggs, for example, are bad for you one week and the next week you have to have eggs in your diet - probably highly linked to higher education and the proliferation of poorly researched articles spawned by the "publish or perish" mindset in academia and non-engineering science. There are very different mechanisms driving jobs in engineering vs those in the "pure" sciences.
I have seen very very little connection between discounting climatological predictions and religion; it's much more fueled by people who simply remain unconvinced by the argument. I'd say, in fact, climate change is more a religion than religion itself. As an engineer familiar with data and interpretation, I'm certainly unconvinced by the arguments that proponents of man made climate change make. If you believe in their analyses, then you would also have to believe that we have to dramatically depopulate the world; and nobody is going to go there - that one issue, in fact, could be linked to religion.