Mass shootings in Maine

#827
#827
kiddiedoc said:
See?

All hat, no cattle.

I guess maybe we should "just do SOMETHING?"
Click to expand...
I never even said we should do something. I just made fun of your porcine friend being an emotional b!tch and you got emotional and read more into it than you should have.

Edit: delete my post and ban me for a day if you feel strongly about it.
 
Last edited:
#828
#828
clarksvol00 said:
I never even said we should do something. I just made fun of your porcine friend being an emotional b!tch and you got emotional and read more into it than you should have.

Edit: delete my post and ban me for a day if you feel strongly about it.
Click to expand...
But you're calling someone else an emotional b!tch? That's gold, Clark!
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#830
#830
clarksvol00 said:
Pay attention. A poster who regularly rants and raves about anything he doesn't like started accusing another poster of emotional b!tching. I made fun of @hog88 and it bunched up @kiddiedoc 's panties.
Click to expand...
Not really. I'm just waiting for someone on the "more gun laws" side to post even one single coherent suggestion as to what they would like to see in legislation.

Guess what? Still not a single reply.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider, InVOLuntary and hog88
#832
#832
Septic said:
No I wasn't.

Just because you want my argument to be that doesn't make it so.

I've stated that crazy people with easy access to guns is the problem. Mass shootings wouldn't happen without an equal amount of both of those ingredients. You don't have to like it but it's undeniable. The argument that guns don't shoot themselves holds up until it's pointed out that crazy people aren't throwing bags of marshmallows to efficiently and quickly commit mass murder in crowded spaces.

Conflating car deaths and murder is a nonsensical, it deserves ridicule.

You guys are trying too hard to paint me as the anti-gun boogy man. It's ironic because I've spent the last two days trying to decide between Federal HST and Hornaday Critical Defense vs Critical duty for my new Glock 27.
Click to expand...
so why is it that mass casualty events are the only one that matters? they account for at most 2.5% of the "gun" problem. you are wanting to deny American's their rights, 2A, 4A, and 5th, for about 1k deaths a year. but only for this one certain thing, nothing else.

and I like how semantic you are being, no crap mass SHOOTINGS couldn't happen without the guns. A shooting requires a gun. I am looking at all deaths instead of cherry picking the 0.000002% that fit an agenda. Looking at mass casualty events as a whole would paint a better picture.

Here in Atlanta we have had a multiple death car accident on:
October 9th: 3 dead
September 30th: 2 dead, 1 a vegetable
September 6th: 5 dead
September 5th: 2 dead
August 9th: 3 dead

and thats just a 2 month period.

Multiple death Shootings during that same time frame:
Sept 16: 2 dead

News | Atlanta Police Department

www.atlantapd.org

I am approximately 15x more likely to die in a car accident in Atlanta than get shot. but you are telling I should lose my rights because of the thing that is 15x less likely to happen, while nothing is required for the FAR more dangerous tool. that dog don't hunt. There is a reason I wear a seat belt but don't walk around strapped. and its because i know the actual statistics instead of relying on fear mongering cherry picking.

I have always been a fan of Federal, never had an issue with them, but I don't have a history with Hornady, and I have only heard good things about them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, StarRaider, hog88 and 1 other person
#833
#833
kiddiedoc said:
Not really. I'm just waiting for someone on the "more gun laws" side to post even one single coherent suggestion as to what they would like to see in legislation.

Guess what? Still not a single reply.
Click to expand...
Then why did you reply to me and call me a simpleton as if i made some kind of gun argument? Seems like you were accusing me of taking a position I never took (one of the go-to arguments for the dumbest VN posters). Congratulations on sacrificing what little credibility you have to advance a moronic argument in defense of swineb!tch.
 
#834
#834
LouderVol said:
so why is it that mass casualty events are the only one that matters? they account for at most 2.5% of the "gun" problem. you are wanting to deny American's their rights, 2A, 4A, and 5th, for about 1k deaths a year. but only for this one certain thing, nothing else.

and I like how semantic you are being, no crap mass SHOOTINGS couldn't happen without the guns. A shooting requires a gun. I am looking at all deaths instead of cherry picking the 0.000002% that fit an agenda. Looking at mass casualty events as a whole would paint a better picture.

Here in Atlanta we have had a multiple death car accident on:
October 9th: 3 dead
September 30th: 2 dead, 1 a vegetable
September 6th: 5 dead
September 5th: 2 dead
August 9th: 3 dead

and thats just a 2 month period.

Multiple death Shootings during that same time frame:
Sept 16: 2 dead

News | Atlanta Police Department

www.atlantapd.org

I am approximately 15x more likely to die in a car accident in Atlanta than get shot. but you are telling I should lose my rights because of the thing that is 15x less likely to happen, while nothing is required for the FAR more dangerous tool. that dog don't hunt. There is a reason I wear a seat belt but don't walk around strapped. and its because i know the actual statistics instead of relying on fear mongering cherry picking.

I have always been a fan of Federal, never had an issue with them, but I don't have a history with Hornady, and I have only heard good things about them.
Click to expand...

Because that's the topic of this thread.

If you want to start a thread on vehicular homicide rates, heart disease deaths, black on black violence or gun, knife, hatchet, cross bow, bowstaff, atlatl, bear spray, slingshot, IED violence in general, we can have that - just start a thread, I'll weigh in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pennheel
#835
#835
clarksvol00 said:
Then why did you reply to me and call me a simpleton as if i made some kind of gun argument? Seems like you were accusing me of taking a position I never took (one of the go-to arguments for the dumbest VN posters). Congratulations on sacrificing what little credibility you have to advance a moronic argument in defense of swineb!tch.
Click to expand...
Seems like hog got your 🐐.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider and InVOLuntary
#837
#837
theFallGuy said:
so people knew this would happen but nothing was done. Seems to be a pattern

www.dailymail.co.uk

Texts reveal Maine shooter's colleagues thought he 'was going to snap'

In September, Army Reservists were so concerned that Card, 40, was about to kill that they told each other to 'change the passcode' to the entrance gate of their base in Saco and be 'armed'.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
Click to expand...

Yep, we need tougher and more restrictive gun laws. Plus need to ban a bunch of different kinds of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and kiddiedoc
#839
#839
kiddiedoc said:
Yes, more laws that no one seems capable of describing.
Click to expand...

Yes, we have to do something because the current laws are sh!t.

It's for the children and if they save just 1 life. I mean seriously is your right to a piece of property more important than an innocent life?
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#840
#840
hog88 said:
Yes, we have to do something because the current laws are sh!t.

It's for the children and if they save just 1 life. I mean seriously is your right to a piece of property more important than an innocent life?
Click to expand...
Movie gif. Billy Crystal as Harry in When Harry Met Sally blinks and calmly offers a box of tissues.
 
#842
#842
Septic said:
Because that's the topic of this thread.

If you want to start a thread on vehicular homicide rates, heart disease deaths, black on black violence or gun, knife, hatchet, cross bow, bowstaff, atlatl, bear spray, slingshot, IED violence in general, we can have that - just start a thread, I'll weigh in.
Click to expand...

But isn’t the ultimate goal of limiting mass murder to limit homicides? And aren’t the majority of those committed by black people?
 
#844
#844
kiddiedoc said:
You succeeded.

Would you like to answer the fundamental question of the thread?

Tons of emotional bitching without one single coherent response. And y'all simpletons wonder why we can't ever have a reasonable conversation on the topic.
Click to expand...
I was just informed that name calling and insults are frowned upon here. You should stop being a big ol meanie and delete your post.
 
Last edited:
#846
#846
Vol8188 said:
But isn’t the ultimate goal of limiting mass murder to limit homicides? And aren’t the majority of those committed by black people?
Click to expand...
Males, regardless of race. The overwhelming majority are committed by males.

Only females should be allowed access to weapons. This would CLEARLY eliminate most homicides by weapons.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top