Size is only attribute for a DL. Poor Dan doesn't have any attack mode nor the slightest mean in him. He takes up some space but not much beyond that. I don't think he causes any opponents real concern. He has no motor to turn on.This has been my thought as well. It's not so much that he sucks or anything; far from it. But I really don't feel that he's played (thus far) to his talent and ability level. The guy has been blessed with size but doesn't quite play like it.
McCullers has been underwhelming thus far. He really needs to step it up.
If you watched the replays on Ap and wku big Dan done a good job plugging the middle not much went up the middle..His presence and him coming after you is enough to be effective. I bet the first thing opposing team players say is "hell fire" hate to get tackled by that big gorilla.
I would call it a difference of opinion regarding the creation of chaos more than negative criticism of big Dan. IMO
No question he is doubled often. And I see the push he gets against O-lines. I just think somebody that large should be able to get off a blocker better than he does. You don;t have to always get to the qb or rb, just shed a blocker and make a play when they are running past you.
I don't care what you're seeing with your own 2 eyes, playing DT is all about gap control, dealing with the double team and stopping the run. The defensive ends and the linebackers are primarily responsible for rushing the QB. You have to play the position to know that and I'm betting you never have.
McCullers is a VFL.
A disruptive DT who can penetrate into the backfield is the best way to slow oregon down - this is what Fairley did in the NT game for Auburn against Oregon
I am not sure big Dan will be that guy but Hood holding the line of scrimmage and not getting penetration isnt enough against Oregon - most likely candidates are big dan and couch and I think both will have to get into the backfield at will for us to win
our LB's just can't play with Oregon in space