If Memphis is the "better program" it should be consistently getting better players, better tourney seeds, and better post-season results. Traditionally that is the case, but as of right now, only one of those holds true. You are getting better players.
If you're only looking back one or two years, that may be true, look back any further and it isn't.
If UT was so far below Memphis in terms of being a relevant national power, you wouldn't be on a UT forum in the first place.
I've visited UTC forums, ETSU forums, Miami forums, Kentucky forums, Ole Miss forums, Florida International forums, Florida Atlantic forums and MTSU forums to tak about basketball. Feel better? I was invited to this forum by a UT fan and I live in Knoxville. I actually enjoy talking about UT sports with fans that can think rationally and make coherent points.
You talk about bumping this thread come December to show us what's up, yet you dismiss Pastner's first season due to the coaching transition. I won't even call it a change, a transition to someone already on staff that the players already were familiar with. Why not give CCM a pass in his first season?
Pastner should get a pass his first year just like CCM should. But why can't you see that? When they rag on Pastner for the way he's performed after someone nuked Memphis' programs, is it that hard to see the correlations between Pastner and CCM? Times are going to be tough for UT and I never said it was going to be CCM's fault.
Do I need to continue, or is that enough for you to see what I mean?