bamawriter
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2010
- Messages
- 26,214
- Likes
- 16,457
Actually you are wrong. On several fronts.
Look at chick-fil-a. They never said that they wouldn't serve/employee/support homosexuals, the owner simply said he disagreed with the lifestyle. Was Dan Cathy "working against" gays? Of course not, he was just speaking his beliefs. Neil Clark Warren who founded e-harmony was forced to create a site for gay couples as well or else New Jersey was going to shut him down.
So had you read what I said originally, I have no problem what two adults do. But they want to convince me that what they are doing is ok/safe/normal/acceptable/whatever and I am not convinced so then I am demonized...
When it comes to Chick-Fil-A, do gays and gay rights supporters no have a right to boycott whomever they choose? I still eat at Chick-Fil-A, because it's delicious. But I don't blame anyone from using his wallet to express his conscience. Now, I'm not for anyone using the power of government to silence or punish dissent, but that is a separate matter.
But what you are talking about is different. You said that you oppose homosexuality. That's different from opposing economic or government intrusion, unless you are assuming that the vast, vast majority of homosexuals are participating in these activities. Opposing homosexuality in general is to tell someone "you can't be gay." Or at the very least, "you can't act on your feelings." I'm sorry, but you don't have that right.