SpaceCoastVol
Jacked up on moonshine and testosterone
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 51,735
- Likes
- 63,967
Now you are shifting the goalposts a bit because your original comment was to just have them serve two years whether they had student debt or none at all.I disagree that it doesn't have any benefit, and I am not talking about military conscription. I'm talking about service. You want your student loan paid off? Join the ****ing Peace Corp if you are too much of a coward to join the army.
"Ask not what your country....." - A famous Democrat once said that.
Still slaveryYes I did cite JFK because he was absolutely right. I'm not as tribal as you might think.
And it's not conscription if you have a choice of how to serve. If you are sent into the army then you are right. But you can do many other things. I would even accept volunteering at a homeless shelter or God forbid a veterans center.
Ministry of National Defense's response to US threats and intimidation: Never work on usRobots are supposedly the future of warfare.
That’s part of what General Papro was talking about in turning the Taiwan Strait into a
“Hellscape”
no, it isnt a meritocracy with DEI..totally incompatible.
Milley, who did not specifically mention the nominee during the event, made it clear to the audience that he views the military as a meritocracy.
“If you meet the standards, our military must be, and always should be, a standards-based, merit-based military period, full stop,” he said.
This quote shows just how FOS and what a POS Milley is:
The physical standards for women have always been lower than the standards for men even when they have the same MOS. And when the standards are too high for females at a school or what-have-you they lower the standards.
If the military was a meritocracy there would be no difference between the sexes in physical standards.