obxvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2005
- Messages
- 1,605
- Likes
- 1,118
Me too. They didn’t have the star system. Both were considered “blue chip” recruits. I would peruse the Parade All-America and USA Today All-America lists and read up on Sporting News reports to see what I should look forward to. Peyton was regarded higher by all and the Max Emfinger listing sealed the consensus. The “many” were locals…not national based. When both trotted out against UCLA, I didn’t think Peyton could physically endure an offensive series. That would be a “report” circa early 90’s. You didn’t have the plethora of self-manufactured recruiting experts and the message board narratives that manufactured overrating due to lineage. Most of us had never seen a single highlight of the kid but NFL scouts who witnesses him throwing the ball around at Saints practices raved about him.coaches thought similar I guess since both Peyton and Stewart got the chance to take over QB1 after Colquitt and Helton were out.
I followed recruiting back then more than I do now. Stewart was highly rated by the few who covered recruiting back then as well. Many thought Stewart may be better and said he had earned his rating based off his performance and skills whereas Manning had earned his off of Archie's name.
He was hyped and I credited him as a blue chip recruit. With everything that was available to recruitniks at the time, your memory OVERcredits him. Vols fans were excited at landing TWO top line QB prospects. There was no narrative that Peyton was a product of his daddy. Many had no memory of Archie as a college legend…just the guy finishing his career at Houston and Minnesota as a backup.Time plays tricks on all of us and I'm sure we both have our own memory of that recruitment year. That was a time of 900 numbers for recruiting hotlines is where you got the most accurate recruiting information. I will say this. Mine and your memory are similar but not exact. From my memory, you are not giving Stewart the credit he deserved as a recruit.
Spurrier did it on purpose, to show he COULD. It was more “look at me, not these guys I allow to play QB for me.” For Fulmer it was desperation when either Erik or Rick struggled in a series. It got worse when UGA showed everybody that Clausen couldn’t make you pay over the top with his less than mediocre arm if the defensive backs kept everything in front of them. Telling that Fulmer had two losing seasons in fifteen and in both he played musical chairs at the most important position.Reminds me of end of 04 season Ainge injury
Enter R.Clausen demolishes A&M in cotton bowl
Enter 05 season Fulmer decides to pull a Spurrier and use 2 qbs, teams then realized R.Clausen didn't have an arm.
SMH
I don't see Huepel doing that
It doesn’t take to much for logic to get in the way for some on this board. GBO