'24 MO DL Williams Nwaneri (Mizzou commit)

No, he’s guessing like 90% of this board does most of the time.
What am I guessing at? I made a pretty basic statement that will be, and in fact, has already been absolutely true. We have already missed on a couple guys that had us in their top choices of schools. We will miss on some more, but we can't take them all anyway.
 
These morans who always spout 🐰💩 about everything. I'm so sick of stupidity. I'm calling air'one y'all mua effs out. Dipshits.


Did I do that right, @Ulysees E. McGill ?

btw woodlawn I agree.
You would agree...

We get who we get. If you don't like our staff because they don't recruit well enough to suit you...then you're an idiot.

Fahr em all, these soft losers can't close a $10 hooker with a twenty dollar bill!! They gotta do better recruiting, or we gon suck forever!!!....did I do that right?
 
I love our staff, but we have to start closing the deal. Theses other schools aren’t like all shucks take your time they are vultures who press and say anything to win the recruit. I am not saying we need to do that, but we need to close strong. How we close is key! GBO!
If they fail to find and develop talent then that will be the time to talk about how they didn't close deals or play the game right. Some of those same recruits will be in the portal in a year or two. Many will feel they were misled and betrayed. They will remember who recruited them right.... and they'll tell others including future recruits who was truthful.

USCw seems to have recently engaged in some "slick" games and negative recruiting. That may work at least short term. But having integrity in something not particularly known for integrity... will win you the right kinds of guys over time either as initial signees or transfers.


IOW's, let the facts come in before declaring failure.

PS- there is plenty of talent out there which includes guys without the high rankings. Just find talent.
 
USCw seems to have recently engaged in some "slick" games and negative recruiting. That may work at least short term. But having integrity in something not particularly known for integrity... will win you the right kinds of guys over time either as initial signees or transfers.

Do you have any source discussing this, or is this board-manufactured BS?
 
You would agree...

We get who we get. If you don't like our staff because they don't recruit well enough to suit you...then you're an idiot.

Fahr em all, these soft losers can't close a $10 hooker with a twenty dollar bill!! They gotta do better recruiting, or we gon suck forever!!!....did I do that right?
So, fahr the linebackers coach?
 
I’m afraid this kid will unfortunately end up a Dawg. Is there a better closer and flipper in the game than Kirby Smart?
Dude has two nattys and gunning for a third and is 6-1 against us all double digit wins. He puts guys into the NFL as well. I love our coach but Kirby is on another level right now.
I smell dawg s**t in here
 
I smell dawg s**t in here
InconsequentialBoilingInsect-max-1mb.gif
 
Do you have any source discussing this, or is this board-manufactured BS?
Just the references here to comments made. Are you saying the mother did not have a bad social media interaction or buy into USCw's academic pitch?
 
Dude has two nattys and gunning for a third and is 6-1 against us all double digit wins. He puts guys into the NFL as well. I love our coach but Kirby is on another level right now.
Your Kirby slobber duly noted...

Heupel in his first two years has put how many guys into the NFL? He took over a roster that some of the talking heads predicted would take years and multiple classes to fix. Four of the guys drafted this year would not have been drafted without this staff.

Five others were taken in the '22 draft. Heupel resurrected V Jones' career. Butler and Jackson very likely would not have been drafted if coached by any of the past 4 HC's.

No one.... including Kirby... has a better NFL draft story to tell than Heupel.
 
Just the references here to comments made. Are you saying the mother did not have a bad social media interaction or buy into USCw's academic pitch?
As I recall, that social media interaction occurred after the announcement. An academic pitch is now considered "slick games"?
 
As I recall, that social media interaction occurred after the announcement. An academic pitch is now considered "slick games"?
Depends on how it was done but in the way described... yeah. UT isn't Harvard but it isn't a low level school either. And a lot of it depends on the person's major.

USC fan?
 
You would agree...

We get who we get. If you don't like our staff because they don't recruit well enough to suit you...then you're an idiot.

Fahr em all, these soft losers can't close a $10 hooker with a twenty dollar bill!! They gotta do better recruiting, or we gon suck forever!!!....did I do that right?
There are still $10 hookers?
 

VN Store



Back
Top