'24 MO WR Ryan Wingo (Texas commit)

#1,826
#1,826
OrangeTsar said:
And if he didn’t, would the University actually sue him? That would do WONDERS for their recruiting 😉
Let’s face it, this law was NOT thought through very well. It is a disaster waiting to happen
Click to expand...
Florida straight up didn’t pay a kid and it’s still working for them…… I bet Missouri will have no issues….not for sure when they will be free to transfer though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19_GBO_19 and VolNash17
#1,827
#1,827
according to Mizzou's mod Wingo is going to announce between Texas and Missouri next week. Lets hope that is false as Uncle Austin had us as the leaders last week. I know that NIL Law has become a problem though
 
#1,828
#1,828
Abvolsfan92 said:
according to Mizzou's mod Wingo is going to announce between Texas and Missouri next week. Let’s hope that is false as Uncle Austin had us as the leaders last week. I know that NIL Law has become a problem though
Click to expand...

The money from Texas must be huge because sark has been a HC coach for various programs for almost a decade and it has amounted nothing but mediocrity. How can Wingo look at what Heupel and Co have done and say nah Mizzou and Texas it what’s best for my career. I can understand Ohio state, USC, etc hopefully that mod is just talking out of his ass
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jerry123 and Abvolsfan92
#1,829
#1,829
LouderVol said:
I can't find the actual text to the new amendment, but the original law, and revision in 2022, don't limit any high schoolers ability to engage in NIL deals. It only defines how NIL works in its own state. anybody wishing to engage in NIL deals in another state would be subject to that state's laws.
Click to expand...
WillisWG said:
16. (1) A high school athlete who competes on an interscholastic athletic team in 241 this state that is sponsored by a public school or by a private school whose students
242 compete against a public school's students may earn or attempt to earn compensation
243 from the use of such athlete's name, image, likeness rights, or athletic reputation as
244 provided in this section, subject to the following:
245 (a) A high school athlete shall have the right to discuss earning or attempting to 246 earn such compensation before signing an athletic letter of intent or other written
247 agreement only when having discussions about potential enrollment with a
248 postsecondary educational institution in this state; and
249 (b) A high school athlete shall have the right to earn or attempt to earn such
250 compensation only after signing an athletic letter of intent or other written agreement to
251 enroll in a postsecondary educational institution in this state.
252 (2) The discussion of, or earning or attempting to earn, compensation from the 253 use of such high school athlete's name, image, likeness rights, or athletic reputation as
254 provided in this section shall not be construed to be a violation of any rules and 255 regulations a high school student and high schools are required to follow to maintain
256 and protect a high school athlete's high school eligibility to participate in high school
257 athletics in this state

Bill Text: MO HB417 | 2023 | Regular Session | Enrolled | LegiScan
Click to expand...
 
#1,830
#1,830
IMissTheMidRangeGame said:
The money from Texas must be huge because sark has been a coach for almost a decade and it has amounted nothing but mediocrity. How can Wingo look at what Heupel and Co have done and say nah Mizzou and Texas it what’s best for my career. I can understand Ohio state, USC, etc hopefully that mod is just talking out of his ass
Click to expand...
Texas is starting to be a pain in our ass
 
#1,833
#1,833
85SugarVol said:
Never.
Does this reek of commerce clause to anybody else?
Click to expand...

Possibly but a case under equal protection clause would be easier to make.

Player A signs with Missouri and start earning NIL, player B signs out of state but isn't permitted to pursue NIL until...
 
#1,841
#1,841
RAVOL said:
I will be very surprised if he doesn't end up a VOL. Now money could be ridiculous and hard to say No too. TN has been the place he is most comfortable loves Pope and Heupel and our offense just makes to much sense or does it come down to cents. In CHRIST Alone
Click to expand...
I won't. This one has felt weird for awhile.

Did he release a Top 3? 247 now shows us out of it. Seems to show a Top 3 of Texas, Mizzou, and Georgia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeTrain
#1,842
#1,842
Weezer said:
I won't. This one has felt weird for awhile.

Did he release a Top 3? 247 now shows us out of it. Seems to show a Top 3 of Texas, Mizzou, and Georgia.
Click to expand...

thought I read in July Georgia was completely out of it and their mods felt like it wasn’t a possibility anymore. Don’t think any of the services have any idea. Kids had three crystal balls already. Hell rivals mentioned Michigan and not us lmoa
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlinghamptonVol
#1,843
#1,843
yeah, I don't think that contradicts anything I said. The Missouri law doesn't infer what other states can do.

and I really doubt that high school football in a singular state counts as "interstate commerce". out-of-state NILs aren't banned, that would be a commerce clause.

the equal protection clause notes similar conditions and circumstances. Unless universities are suddenly going to have to drop the instate/out of state distinctions I don't see equal protection being an issue for NIL deals. Geographic location seems to be an accepted and established "discrimination". and that also holds up for commerce as well, as pretty much every state I have heard of treats in-state businesses differently than out-of-state businesses.
 
#1,844
#1,844
Weezer said:
I won't. This one has felt weird for awhile.

Did he release a Top 3? 247 now shows us out of it. Seems to show a Top 3 of Texas, Mizzou, and Georgia.
Click to expand...
Wingo may rather want to win over the big NIL from his home state I'm seeing winning trump's cash he going to the good guys book it😉😉😉
 
#1,847
#1,847
knoxvol52 said:
Wingo may rather want to win over the big NIL from his home state I'm seeing winning trump's cash he going to the good guys book it😉😉😉
Click to expand...
Wingo is an EE. Nwaneri wasn’t going to be on campus till much later; he will collect almost a full year of NIL before he sets foot on the field for Missouri. Wingo on the other hand would have to wait four months longer if he goes to Missouri vs another program to get nil payments. Nwaneri also as a Dlinemen can get on the field earlier at Missouri most likely and still can transfer via portal and make even more money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: knoxvol52
#1,849
#1,849
LouderVol said:
yeah, I don't think that contradicts anything I said. The Missouri law doesn't infer what other states can do.

and I really doubt that high school football in a singular state counts as "interstate commerce". out-of-state NILs aren't banned, that would be a commerce clause.

the equal protection clause notes similar conditions and circumstances. Unless universities are suddenly going to have to drop the instate/out of state distinctions I don't see equal protection being an issue for NIL deals. Geographic location seems to be an accepted and established "discrimination". and that also holds up for commerce as well, as pretty much every state I have heard of treats in-state businesses differently than out-of-state businesses.
Click to expand...
I thought I read on here that the MO law said that if a HS athlete takes nil $ from out of state school they loose their amiture status and they are no longer HS eligible.

This might have just been internet rumor.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top