StarRaider
Yes they do call me Einstein
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2008
- Messages
- 15,834
- Likes
- 39,318
Money. Why would a company choose to do this to sell a gallon of water for 50 cents when they can sell a 1.5 L bottle of Fiji water for $3. There's just not enough money to be made in it......yet.I understand (at least to some level). But the part I’m still not grasping is why not simply use distillation to remove the salt? I would imagine we could boil water and collect the steaks pretty cheap. I want to say it sells for around 50 cents a gallon now but could be made cheaper if not sold by the gallon
Money. Why would a company choose to do this to sell a gallon of water for 50 cents when they can sell a 1.5 L bottle of Fiji water for $3. There's just not enough money to be made in it......yet.
There is not a need for it currently. Why would I buy a gallon of desalinated ocean water when I could just turn on the tap and get that good ole Kingsport city water for pennies on the dollar?That’s not really an answer. Plenty of companies sell things on large scales and are profitable. And I see no way a company can’t use reverse osmosis, distillation, or some other technique to remove salt from water at a cheaper rate than it would be to invade a foreign country and take their water.
Especially since total annual rainfall is increasing
home RO units are for fresh water "desal".... sea water desal requires higher pressures to get to "fresh water" (higher energy costs) and higher as in "an order of magnitude" or moreThank you. Didn’t consider that. Plenty of people do reverse osmosis in their homes and it doesn’t seem that expensive. I would imagine it would be manageable on a wide scale and cheap enough to prevent #WaterWars
There is not a need for it currently. Why would I buy a gallon of desalinated ocean water when I could just turn on the tap and get that good ole Kingsport city water for pennies on the dollar?
To another point, i'm not sure annual rainfall increase combined with melting more glaciers is a great recipe for the continued success of mankind.I’m not claiming there is a current need for it. But I’m saying because it’s possible today at a reasonable price and likely even cheaper in the future, I don’t NDT is right about Water Wars being a future human problem. Especially not given annual rainfall seems to be trending up and I imagine would only increase as we melt more glaciers.
To another point, i'm not sure annual rainfall increase combined with melting more glaciers is a great recipe for the continued success of mankind.
Temporarily. I think I'm just thinking way, way longer term than you.
Part of the summary in his link attributed the "loss" to usage.