Vol8188
revolUTion in the air!
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2011
- Messages
- 45,959
- Likes
- 43,323
If you can't answer the questions "at what point is a fetus deemed savable?", "who makes the determination?", and "who pays?"You believe "Roe v Wade did it brilliantly" answers the questions I asked? Go ahead then. Explain that and I'll gladly answer those.
1. That point isn't the same for all and changes, but is also not the question. The question was "if they can be saved, why wouldn't you"
2. The same people who pay the price for saving a new born that is given up by the mother
3. No.
If you can't answer the questions "at what point is a fetus deemed savable?", "who makes the determination?", and "who pays?"
then your question is moot.
But as a general rule, if an aborted fetus can be saved, I have no problem with efforts to save it if the expense isn't prohibitive.
Then it’s a fair comparison when JB stated the US has nuclear weapons and F15’s , he was implying his intent to use those weapons against US citizens and states with the thought of secession.
Seems rational and reasonable ;/I would negotiate a lease in-perpetuity of $100 per year for all of our military facilities currently there. A protection treaty baring them from signing defense treaties with other nations and let them be.
Ok we agree. As usual @hog88 isn’t very bright.Hog brought up leasing. I said purchase outright.
Leasing could get real messy..
And I’d agree about “most bases”. Pearl is very very special. A natural deep water protected port right in the middle of the pacific. The bases are inconsequential. It’s the geography that has value.I'd say most all of our foreign military bases are leased in some manner. Hasn't been much of an issue.