Mueller Report Imminent

#3,827
#3,827
n_huffhines said:
You have an opinion* followed by a fact. I'm not even sure what your point is. Are you saying it's OK that he tried to obstruct justice?

*the truth may be he accidentally hired people who weren't willing to go down for him
Click to expand...

IMO he didn't attempt to obstruct justice. Also that he did hire people that prevented him from making some moves that would have been borderline.
 
#3,828
#3,828
1972 Grad said:
Wow! Huff is really triggered by his TDS today. He has taken over for LG, and is bashing Trump in multiple threads. I knew that he was a big Obama supporter, but he has gone over the edge this morning.
Click to expand...

I feel like arguing why it’s near impossible to prove obstruction. But the I realize it’s more fun to get a goos laugh.

I’m now looking forward to the impeachment push. More exposure for the vacuous Democrats.

I don’t think the Mueller saga is quite done yet, either.

The only thing we know with certainty is that no American is going to be charged with collusion or obstruction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#3,830
#3,830
hog88 said:
Dang Luther you just love to prove the stereotype don't you?

It doesn't matter what the Dem base is looking for, you guys are going to vote Dem regardless of what they do, what they say or who they run. They don't need to worry about your vote but you and those like you are not going to bring them the senate, WH or even a continued majority in the house. They need to be appealing to the center and right now they are doing everything except that.
Click to expand...

This should be obvious to anyone even putting in a modicum of intellectual effort. The hard base (for either side) is pretty much set. You need to 1) make sure the "soft" liners are motivated to turn out and 2) try to pull as much from the middle as possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88 and JCP201
#3,831
#3,831
n_huffhines said:
You have an opinion* followed by a fact. I'm not even sure what your point is. Are you saying it's OK that he tried to obstruct justice?

*the truth may be he accidentally hired people who weren't willing to go down for him
Click to expand...

Could be true. Bottom line is that a crime has to be at least attempted. We can talk about running a Pump and Dump, but if it is never done... A crime was not committed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1
#3,832
#3,832
roosterjbh said:
Ok, but the question was what signature legislation had the House passed. That was the major headlining bill.

Anything the House passes will get killed in the senate. Congress is a zero sum game
Click to expand...
So the answer remains they have successfully passed nothing that will become law and are not likely to successfully pass anything at all that changes anything.

So move on the impeachment. That's the ticket!
 
#3,833
#3,833
hog88 said:
IMO he didn't attempt to obstruct justice. Also that he did hire people that prevented him from making some moves that would have been borderline.
Click to expand...

Of course he didn’t. Mueller said they fully cooperated. No documents withheld. No executive privilege invoked. Most important of all, no crime to cover up. It’s more Democrat theatre.

And they know they can count on the gullible gaggle like mick and Luth to slurp up more lies and then ask for seconds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, tennvols77 and 37L1
#3,835
#3,835
37L1 said:
So the answer remains they have successfully passed nothing that will become law and are not likely to successfully pass anything at all that changes anything.

So move on the impeachment. That's the ticket!
Click to expand...

It's a chess move to fight a very strong economy.
 
#3,837
#3,837
Burger said:
Could be true. Bottom line is that a crime has to be at least attempted. We can talk about running a Pump and Dump, but if it is never done... A crime was not committed.
Click to expand...

Nobody said there was a crime. Does that excuse Trump from culpability?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top