BowlBrother85
1 star recruit
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 43,363
- Likes
- 37,964
Or spin it this way: Trump seeks advice from the White House Counsel, Counsel advises against firing Mueller and Trump heeds his advice and doesn't fire Mueller. Lawyers.There is plenty of proof.
But one major problem we have is that Barr and Trump have manipulated their idiot base with the misleading summary memo, with Trump falsely claiming exoneration, followed by release of the report a month later, well after the idiot Trump base had accepted Barr's and Trump's falsehoods and lies.
Congressional testimony by McGahn for example where he describes getting that call from Trump one night at home, telling him to conjure up a way to fire Mueller, with him telling he won't do it, and Trump asking him not to tell anyone he asked, might just give folks pause before continuing to tout the exoneration line.
There is plenty of proof.
But one major problem we have is that Barr and Trump have manipulated their idiot base with the misleading summary memo, with Trump falsely claiming exoneration, followed by release of the report a month later, well after the idiot Trump base had accepted Barr's and Trump's falsehoods and lies.
Congressional testimony by McGahn for example where he describes getting that call from Trump one night at home, telling him to conjure up a way to fire Mueller, with him telling he won't do it, and Trump asking him not to tell anyone he asked, might just give folks pause before continuing to tout the exoneration line.
Doesn't sound like he is confident that any crimes were committed. Gray guy commenting on a gray area.Why say anything at all unless he wanted it known, that he isn't confident no crimes were committed? The word "clearly" sounds designed to make you have to guess what this degree of lack of confidence is.
Yes but the whining and b*tching wouldn't have.I really don't think they have to deal with that at all. If the President had just kept his mouth shut and let Mueller do his job like most everyone (right and left) on this board recommended the events of today would have never happened. It would have ended with there was Russian interference but no conspiracy (collusion).
Nope. No more money for fake investigations. You can't impeach or indict over a fake coup.Impeachment is as much a political issue as it is a pure question of law. It is far more complicated than simply "Did he commit a crime worthy of being impeached?" which he clearly did.
I am torn on this issue, but politically think the wiser course is to continue to investigate and see where that leads. I think it would be immensely helpful if Trump, himself, volunteered to come speak to Congress about this. After all, according to him he's the most transparent President in history. Perhaps he can clear the air. Maybe explain a few things.
Doesn't sound like he is confident that any crimes were committed. Gray guy commenting on a gray area.
You guys are really twisting in the wind. That statement coupled with the one about not being able to indict a setting president leaves no doubt about what Mueller meant.
He was handed a pile of sh!t and a couple slices of bread. What would you have made out of that?Ultimately, Mueller hasn't made anyone happy. To a certain extent, I have to think that is how he planned it. Sort of like "I will just write a bunch of non-committal language down and let the politicians take it from here as far as what to what to do with it."
Ultimately, Mueller hasn't made anyone happy. To a certain extent, I have to think that is how he planned it. Sort of like "I will just write a bunch of non-committal language down and let the politicians take it from here as far as what to what to do with it."