Mueller Report Imminent

#8,926
#8,926
luthervol said:
I went with knoxnews in the spirit of the upcoming season.
Should Donald Trump be indicted? These former East Tennessee prosecutors say yes
The two-time U.S. attorney found what he read so disturbing he joined nearly 800 former federal prosecutors this week in signing a letter declaring the report lays out a textbook case for obstruction of justice charges against President Donald Trump. Two other veteran East Tennessee prosecutors signed the letter as well.
"It's not a Republican or a Democratic thing," Dillard said. "It's an American thing. Based on what I know, if this was an ordinary individual, the case would certainly have severe consequences, and there is ample evidence that any U.S. attorney could make that decision. We need to hear from (special counsel) Robert Mueller. Otherwise the country at large is not going to know the truth."
Click to expand...
That's a letter from former prosecutors, BFD. If it was a textbook case why didn't Mueller make a recommendation? Instead he ducked and weaved and made excuses and then passed the buck. Doesn't sound so textbook to me based upon the person responsible for the investigation actions. And he doesn't want to discuss it, answer questions about it or appear before Congress about it. The only prosecutor that matters right now is the AG, who heads the DOJ. So that letter carries no water, except the political kind, and that kind of water will always leave you thirsty because it's a mirage. It has no legal effect on the matter of the President's impeachment/indictment whatsoever.

Get back to my original post: List the specific actions that rise to the level of impeachment and then an indictment. Leave the "But he says mean things!" BS out of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed, Hayezb, DC_Vol and 3 others
#8,927
#8,927
Hey, luther. . .
37L1 said:
luther, while you're at it, list all those things that Trump has done while President that makes him a once in 300 years catastrophe, as you describe him.

Leave out all the "But he says mean things!"
Click to expand...

tenor.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01 and SpaceCoastVol
#8,928
#8,928
37L1 said:
That's a letter from former prosecutors, BFD. If it was a textbook case why didn't Mueller make a recommendation? Instead he ducked and weaved and made excuses and then passed the buck. Doesn't sound so textbook to me based upon the person responsible for the investigation actions. And he doesn't want to discuss it, answer questions about it or appear before Congress about it. The only prosecutor that matters right now is the AG, who heads the DOJ. So that letter carries no water, except the political kind, and that kind of water will always leave you thirsty because it's a mirage. It has no legal effect on the matter of the President's impeachment/indictment whatsoever.

Get back to my original post: List the specific actions that rise to the level of impeachment and then an indictment. Leave the "But he says mean things!" BS out of it.
Click to expand...
Get a clue.
Barr is a stooge.
I can't cure your blindness. If you're going to wave off the opinions of over 800 former prosecutors with a BFD, why would I bother trying to convince you of anything?
 
#8,931
#8,931
Orange_Vol1321 said:
Yea, you all have nothing.
Click to expand...
Had to have high, high hopes for a living
Shooting for the stars when I couldn't make a killing
Didn't have a dime but I always had a vision
Always had high, high hopes
Had to have high, high hopes for a living
Didn't know how but I always had a feeling
I was gonna be that one in a million
Always had high, high hopes
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#8,934
#8,934
luthervol said:
Get a clue.
Barr is a stooge.
I can't cure your blindness. If you're going to wave off the opinions of over 800 former prosecutors with a BFD, why would I bother trying to convince you of anything?
Click to expand...
What about Mueller? He passed the buck to Barr, now didn't he?

Come on, man, if they had anything substantive they would have done more than they did but they didn't, now did they? Because they didn't have anything substantive that would lead to impeachment/indictment, you now hold out hope that further inquiry will find something "probably in the last place they look."

You are the one that is blind, luther, you know you got nothing and are trying desperately to find something, holding out for a faint glimmer of hope in your dark, dark night, that you have brought onto yourself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#8,938
#8,938
37L1 said:
What about Mueller? He passed the buck to Barr, now didn't he?

Come on, man, if they had anything substantive they would have done more than they did but they didn't, now did they? Because they didn't have anything substantive that would lead to impeachment/indictment, you now hold out hope that further inquiry will find something "probably in the last place they look."

You are the one that is blind, luther, you know you got nothing and are trying desperately to find something, holding out for a faint glimmer of hope in your dark, dark night, that you have brought onto yourself.
Click to expand...
Mueller did what he felt he was charged to do.
Only the blind would claim that 900 former prosecutors (many repubs) claiming enough evidence to indict any other person is nothing.
 
#8,940
#8,940
luthervol said:
Mueller did what he felt he was charged to do.
Only the blind would claim that 900 former prosecutors (many repubs) claiming enough evidence to indict any other person is nothing.
Click to expand...
BTW, Dershowitz, doesn't agree with them, so what?
It is nothing, as it is only opinions that have no effect on whether or not anything legally happens in Congress, the DOJ or a court of law. But, hey, it gives you "feels" then that's all that matters, right?

So back to posting up a list, luther, where is it? A letter that is based upon opinions isn't a list. Where are the specific actions that rise to the level of actually getting an impeachment/indictment? Where?

Mueller, was charged to find if there was Russian influence/collusion/conspiracy. He found that Russia did try and influence but found no collusion/conspiracy. He also investigated obstruction and did not find enough sufficient evidence to make an indictment or referral for action but instead gave it to the AG to decide. Both Barr and Rod Rosenstein concluded that there was insufficient evidence of obstruction.

Deal with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#8,941
#8,941
37L1 said:
The Executive Branch doesn't pass laws. That's the job of Congress, the Legislative Branch.

giphy.gif
Click to expand...
He said "signed" into law you doofus. Nothing is a "law" until it's signed. You must be thinking about passing bills:
mezzanine_137.jpeg.focalcrop.1200x630.50.10.jpg
 
#8,947
#8,947
luthervol said:
I'll give you one that encapsulates many; even though I realize you will be unable and/or unwilling to process.
DeVos,
Click to expand...

Georgia ranks near the bottom in education so obviously anything to change that is a “catastrophe”.
 
#8,948
#8,948
lawgator1 said:
Gotta keep those demons going to keep the cash flowing in.
Click to expand...
Perfectly sums up why the left is keeping this impeachment narrative up as well. Shill to the base and watch money pour in. How much have you sent in?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#8,950
#8,950
luthervol said:
LOL....There is already plenty for impeachment, just no enough to get the Senate to do their job; but the search isn't over.
I'm thinking it will be one of those "you always find it in the last place you look" scenarios.
Click to expand...

Keep going your own way, and don't stop believing, but remember we've all tried to tell you that you are in over your head. I'm guessing you know in the back of your mind that you can't go back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top