Mueller Report Imminent

#8,951
#8,951
luthervol said:
It's even cuter that you think we're the ones being played like a fool.
The cutest of all however, is how Pelosi has owned Trump at every step.
Click to expand...
I mean, he's still President, so she hasn't owned him at every step.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#8,952
#8,952
luthervol said:
I went with knoxnews in the spirit of the upcoming season.
Should Donald Trump be indicted? These former East Tennessee prosecutors say yes
The two-time U.S. attorney found what he read so disturbing he joined nearly 800 former federal prosecutors this week in signing a letter declaring the report lays out a textbook case for obstruction of justice charges against President Donald Trump. Two other veteran East Tennessee prosecutors signed the letter as well.
"It's not a Republican or a Democratic thing," Dillard said. "It's an American thing. Based on what I know, if this was an ordinary individual, the case would certainly have severe consequences, and there is ample evidence that any U.S. attorney could make that decision. We need to hear from (special counsel) Robert Mueller. Otherwise the country at large is not going to know the truth."
Click to expand...

"Former" means they don't count for much anymore. Try the thing with your hand in a bucket, of water and check out the impression you make when you pull it out.
 
#8,953
#8,953
Mick said:
What could Obama have done to prevent what the Russians were doing (hacking our institutions and social media campaign) and what can Trump do now to prevent it?
What's truly funny is Blaming Obama for anything the Russians were doing when he didn't have the tools to secure our internet. Basically he couldn't have stopped the Russians from influencing feeble minded Americans. You were an easy target.
Click to expand...
So blaming Obama, not okay. Blaming Trump, okay. It seems you're saying neither could have done anything, but only one is to blame. And it's not the one who was in office and had the most power to do something. Not seeing the logic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1 and tennvols77
#8,954
#8,954
Weezer said:
So blaming Obama, not okay. Blaming Trump, okay. It seems you're saying neither could have done anything, but only one is to blame. And it's not the one who was in office and had the most power to do something. Not seeing the logic.
Click to expand...

It's the progressive way ... punish the victim and reward the guilty for doing nothing ... and in this case for being nothing. Just to help out the resident libs: Trump = victim; Obama = guilty; doing nothing = knowing there was funny Russian stuff going on but ignoring it because Hiliary was gonna win, so it was of no consequence ... until she didn't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77
#8,955
#8,955
luthervol said:
Mueller did what he felt he was charged to do.
Only the blind would claim that 900 former prosecutors (many repubs) claiming enough evidence to indict any other person is nothing.
Click to expand...
While we're on the subject, you know there's a big difference between indict and convict, right? You know what they say about being able to indict, right?

fetch.php
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and tennvols77
#8,957
#8,957
Weezer said:
So blaming Obama, not okay. Blaming Trump, okay. It seems you're saying neither could have done anything, but only one is to blame. And it's not the one who was in office and had the most power to do something. Not seeing the logic.
Click to expand...
Nobody is blaming Trump for anything Russia was doing other than knowing and encouraging them. Did Trump have anything to do with the hacks? NO. Did he know about them and the probable release? Sure. The campaign did give polling data to Russian agents which likely helped them target Americans. Trump and Campaign are responsible for their own crooked actions. Glossing over that is not going to help your case. Let me know when Obama had more time to arrange a Trump Tower style meeting.
 
#8,959
#8,959
Mick said:
Nobody is blaming Trump for anything Russia was doing other than knowing and encouraging them. Did Trump have anything to do with the hacks? NO. Did he know about them and the probable release? Sure. The campaign did give polling data to Russian agents which likely helped them target Americans. Trump and Campaign are responsible for their own crooked actions. Glossing over that is not going to help your case. Let me know when Obama had more time to arrange a Trump Tower style meeting.
Click to expand...

Well, Hills and company hired a Brit to put together a dossier that they used to convince the FBI to investigate Trump, so there's that. It seems both sides engaged in questionable behavior. It's not the one-sided picture some are trying to create.

And if no one is blaming Trump for what Russia was doing(which some people very much are) why the screams for impeachment?

Lots of things being glossed over in all of this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#8,960
#8,960
AM64 said:
"Former" means they don't count for much anymore. Try the thing with your hand in a bucket, of water and check out the impression you make when you pull it out.
Click to expand...
The whole argument the morons on the right are attempting to make is that he has done nothing impeachable. I was simply refuting that nonsense....nothing more.
 
#8,961
#8,961
luthervol said:
There's enough with obstruction. Time is just not right.
Click to expand...
Is there? The best I can see, Trump attempted to obstruct justice. Hard for me to see attempting to obstruct justice as rising to the level of removal from office. We've discussed past precedent already.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#8,962
#8,962
luthervol said:
I went with knoxnews in the spirit of the upcoming season.
Should Donald Trump be indicted? These former East Tennessee prosecutors say yes
The two-time U.S. attorney found what he read so disturbing he joined nearly 800 former federal prosecutors this week in signing a letter declaring the report lays out a textbook case for obstruction of justice charges against President Donald Trump. Two other veteran East Tennessee prosecutors signed the letter as well.
"It's not a Republican or a Democratic thing," Dillard said. "It's an American thing. Based on what I know, if this was an ordinary individual, the case would certainly have severe consequences, and there is ample evidence that any U.S. attorney could make that decision. We need to hear from (special counsel) Robert Mueller. Otherwise the country at large is not going to know the truth."
Click to expand...

Instead of giving a reason you employ the appeal to authority fallacy. Superb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1, tennvols77 and AM64
#8,963
#8,963
luthervol said:
The whole argument the morons on the right are attempting to make is that he has done nothing impeachable. I was simply refuting that nonsense....nothing more.
Click to expand...
So bring charges. You mentioned something about timing. The sooner you bring charges, the sooner we get to swear in VP Pence. The longer you wait, the longer America get to accelerate the winning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#8,967
#8,967
Weezer said:
Is there? The best I can see, Trump attempted to obstruct justice. Hard for me to see attempting to obstruct justice as rising to the level of removal from office. We've discussed past precedent already.
Click to expand...
He would certainly not be removed from office. That's why Pelosi is waiting.
 
#8,969
#8,969
luthervol said:
He would certainly not be removed from office. That's why Pelosi is waiting.
Click to expand...

Do you believe Congress should have the unregulated ability to investigate every facet of a President's life in the name of oversight? Or is this an only in the case of Trump thing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#8,970
#8,970
Weezer said:
Do you believe Congress should have the unregulated ability to investigate every facet of a President's life in the name of oversight? Or is this an only in the case of Trump thing?
Click to expand...
luther will certainly agree with that right up to the time the next leftist moron is elected. Then it's hands off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77 and AM64
#8,974
#8,974
luthervol said:
The whole argument the morons on the right are attempting to make is that he has done nothing impeachable. I was simply refuting that nonsense....nothing more.
Click to expand...

Hey, a whole bunch of us are saying impeach him ... like you have to pass it to see what's in it kind of action. But then your side has to face up to all the funny stuff that started the Mueller investigation, and no sane Dim wants that to happen. If you want to talk about collusion and obstruction of justice, it's all there, but it's not on Trump's side of the equation. But go for it, we really want to know all about the DNC inspired Steele dossier, the crooked FISA process, biased FBI agents, CIA/FBI stings that nobody bought, and especially an expensive witch hunt based on what had to have been seen as faulty beginnings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol, 37L1 and tennvols77
#8,975
#8,975
Weezer said:
Do you believe Congress should have the unregulated ability to investigate every facet of a President's life in the name of oversight? Or is this an only in the case of Trump thing?
Click to expand...
Yes. It now seems necessary because we elected Trump.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top