Mueller Report Imminent

#10,152
#10,152
Mick said:
Thanks for your time and efforts. I know names places and details are sometimes hard to recall when you have so much coming at you.
Click to expand...

So what I found was testimony by Hope Hicks which is where my original memory came from. I was wrong about one thing, she testified there was no "strategy" regarding leaked emails and that Trump had no advance knowledge of the leaks. But she was not under oath but still subject to criminal referral. That testimony led me to check Don Jr's testimony and he said basically the same thing but not under oath but obviously still subject to criminal referral. I dug around a bit more but lunch break is past over. So ya got me technically. I can create some links if you or anybody else wants them.
 
#10,153
#10,153
nuclearjunky said:
So what I found was testimony by Hope Hicks which is where my original memory came from. I was wrong about one thing, she testified there was no "strategy" regarding leaked emails and that Trump had no advance knowledge of the leaks. But she was not under oath but still subject to criminal referral. That testimony led me to check Don Jr's testimony and he said basically the same thing but not under oath but obviously still subject to criminal referral. I dug around a bit more but lunch break is past over. So ya got me technically. I can create some links if you or anybody else wants them.
Click to expand...
Ok, thanks again.
 
#10,154
#10,154
Judge orders release of docs tied to Cohen's hush-money payments to Stormy Daniels

"The campaign finance violations discussed in the materials are a matter of national importance," Judge William Pauley III said in court papers, denying the government's request for limited redactions. "Now that the government’s investigation into those violations has concluded, it is time that every American has an opportunity to scrutinize the materials."
 
#10,155
#10,155
Mick said:
Judge orders release of docs tied to Cohen's hush-money payments to Stormy Daniels

"The campaign finance violations discussed in the materials are a matter of national importance," Judge William Pauley III said in court papers, denying the government's request for limited redactions. "Now that the government’s investigation into those violations has concluded, it is time that every American has an opportunity to scrutinize the materials."
Click to expand...
I haven't gotten to use this lately. YGHN!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01
#10,156
#10,156
#10,166
#10,166
Judicial Watch: Emails Show Dossier-Connected Top Obama State Department Officials Set ‘Face-to-Face’ Meeting on ‘Russian Matter’ in NY in September 2016

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch and The Daily Caller News Foundation today released 84 pages of documents, including a September 2016 email exchange between then-Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and Special Coordinator for Libya Jonathan Winer, a close associate of dossier author Christopher Steele, discussing a “face-to-face” meeting on a “Russian matter.”

(In June 2016 Nuland permitted a meeting between Steele and the FBI’s legal attaché in Rome. Nuland told CBS News that the State Department knew about the Steele dossier by July 2016.)

According to an op-ed Winer wrote for The Washington Post in 2018, also in September 2016, “Steele and I met in Washington and discussed the information now known as the “dossier… I prepared a two-page summary and shared it with Nuland, who indicated that, like me, she felt that the secretary of state needed to be made aware of this material.”

The documents obtained by Judicial Watch also show that State Department officials continued to use unsecure BlackBerry devices for the transmission of classified material more than a year after Hillary Clinton’s use of an unsecure, non-government email system was revealed.

Judicial Watch obtained the documents in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed on April 25, 2018, on behalf of itself and the Daily Caller News Foundation against the State Department after it failed to respond to three separate FOIA requests (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:18-cv- 00968)). The lawsuit seeks:

    • All records of communications between State Department officials, including former Secretary of State John Kerry, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, on the one hand, and British National Christopher Steele and/or employees or contractors of Steele’s company, Orbis Business Intelligence, on the other hand.

 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77 and BUBear
#10,169
#10,169
Orange_Vol1321 said:
Funny. The Democrats put this law in to place when Clinton was impeached but now they think it should be overlooked.
Click to expand...
This is about the truth coming out, It has nothing to do with Q or pizzagate. Your trump lovin reacharounds are hilarious. But...but Clinton. but but Dems. You know what's not funny, you are incapable of accepting the truth. Sad!
 
#10,170
#10,170
Mick said:
This is about the truth coming out, It has nothing to do with Q or pizzagate. Your trump lovin reacharounds are hilarious. But...but Clinton. but but Dems. You know what's not funny, you are incapable of accepting the truth. Sad!
Click to expand...
You just hyperboled over the fact that
The
Democrats
Passed
This
Law
When
Clinton
Was
Impeached
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed and tennvols77
#10,174
#10,174
Mick said:
This is about the truth coming out, It has nothing to do with Q or pizzagate. Your trump lovin reacharounds are hilarious. But...but Clinton. but but Dems. You know what's not funny, you are incapable of accepting the truth. Sad!
Click to expand...

Ok, what is your truth? What do think about what’s happening in the news lately?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77 and Orange_Vol1321
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top