McDad
I can't brain today; I has the dumb.
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
- Messages
- 56,585
- Likes
- 118,751
Paper, audits and certifications, chief.
Also, I call bull**** that one won't be found. All you gotta do is announce the search.
That's how you tabulate an election without dominion. Dominion also made 120 million from 19 states. Not all counties use Dominion so there are already other options.That's not code.
You can call whatever you want, but no company is going to invest millions in developing essential, proprietary technology only to make it publicly available. To do so would be to declare that you intend to go out of business at the expiration of the current contract.
I didn't say I believe them or not. You keep attributing opinions to me blindly. Another fire, aim, ready moment for you?You can have transparency with recounts and double checks. You don't get the proprietary information. You guys refuse to believe in the recounts and double checks. It is almost comical
CW got caught with his pants on the ground? Actin like a fool with his pants on the ground.
Another assumption. Fire aim ready. That's not the only other solution. I'm not suggesting the government is requesting it. I specifically said the people. You just recalled your lesson the judge gave you and you're refusing to apply it.Excuse me? You have presented a problem, you think a private company should release its proprietary information upon government demand. None will comply and, quite frankly, to request it is unamerican. The only solution to your particular problem is for the government to create the code and machines that will run it, but you don't trust the government so that presents the same set of problems to you again.
If you aren't sure whether or not you believe them, then what is your basis for wanting to take apart Dominion's systems?
The distrust in the election is not uncommon. That's a problem. We need to be able to trust our election system, provide the necessary data to have that confidence and act accordingly.If you believed them you would have the need to demand public viewing of proprietary information.
My understanding is that Dominion called a previous lawsuit slander and got it bounced from courts. So now MyPillow is saying 1A.Is he suing for slander or a free speech violation?
The distrust in the election is not uncommon. That's a problem. We need to be able to trust our election system, provide the necessary data to have that confidence and act accordingly.
it is silly to think voting, recording, and tabulating the votes is some complex endeavor.That's not code.
You can call whatever you want, but no company is going to invest millions in developing essential, proprietary technology only to make it publicly available. To do so would be to declare that you intend to go out of business at the expiration of the current contract.
My understanding is that Dominion called a previous lawsuit slander and got it bounced from courts. So now MyPillow is saying 1A.
But as I said I dont really think civil court would decide any of this. In my incredibly non informed opinion.
I wouldnt be surprised to see this also get bounced out of court.