And here we go again. U insult cause u are incapable of understanding my pov.
That wasn't intended as an insult; it was a legitimate statement.
You have ignored rational, logical, point-by-point discussions since I've started discourse with you. You've conducted yourself in such a way that you've offered little more than paranoid, delusional, megalomaniacal drivel.
I am not seeking to insult you. I am trying to step out of the way of your paranoid babbling. When a paranoid delusional with an overly-inflated sense of importance begins to call me "darling" and make "you keep it up..." statements, I realize it's a lost cause and time to distance myself.
However, I will try one last time to offer you a rational response, again trying to go point by point.
Sorry darlin but I gave u an opportunity to get me to ignore u. U keep it up and its no long on the table.
You are getting creepy. Seriously. Step back and find some context.
As far as I can remember, I haven't responded to anything you've said since inviting me to ignore you. But instead, you pick an internet argument with me over a post to someone else, and that I qualified with "This is speculation, take with a grain of salt."
Get a grip buddy.
The DC hire speculation is different than speculating the way Worley "feels". The DC hire is something that has been discussed and is a very real possibility.
The moon landing conspiracy has been widely discusses also. It doesn't add to the theory's credence. The possibility that Worley may have had his confidence shaken has been discussed. That neither adds to, nor takes away from, its validity.
The idea that the DC decision was strong armed by the AD is nothing more than speculation that you have relied on in your defense of CDD. The only difference between that and my speculation per Worley is as follows:
I admitted from the beginning that it was speculation and should be taken with a grain of salt. Instead, you ignored that part and a made huge deal over a minor point that I don't even really care about in the first place.
Now ur assumption that Worley took his playing time negatively is based on ur personal feelings of the situation if u were in his shoes. If I were to assume by putting myself in his shoes I would have learned from it and helped my confidence. Not be weak and feel it hurt me.
Cool. We're both speculating... Just like you speculated about the AD making the DC decision and forcing it on CDD.
Dooley didn't put Worley in without the safety of having someone else to come in. Which is different when failing when u r the only option and all people have to depend on. I think Dooley did it right to help his development.
Cool. We've both stated that we're both speculating. Why is this such a huge deal to you?
Cool. We've both stated that we're both speculating. Why is this such a huge deal to you?
I am seriously imploring you, OV. Step back and get some context. You are presenting yourself as an unhinged online presence. Take a breath, gain some perspective, and chill the hell out.
