Nathan peterman was better then his stats

We might have had a chance to win if Nate would not have turned it over 4 freaking times. THey should have never started him. Worley is our quarterback.
 
Lets start with the first fumble he had. It was a missed assignment by the RT. The next fumble he had was guess what another missed assignment by eather RB or RT. He even made better reads in the read options then worley. yes he did throw two interceptions but so did worley.

Then after the first fumble! Why was CBJ all up in his grill?

Hint: He was supposed to go to the LOS w 2 plays ...
 
I am with you, looks like I might be the only one, but I'm with you. This was his first start versus a very good defense in a hostile environment, a very bad way to make a start. I would not measure him based on this performance. We might have won if Worley started early, but if Peterman gets another chance in the future and becomes comfortable, he might be good. His throwing is much better to me and he reacts much faster (without the happy feet that Worley has).

I agree, to an extent....but Peterman looked BAAAAD!!! And, I hate the way he hands the ball off....with both hands, across his body....he always bumps into the running back. He could zip it out there a lot quicker than Worley, though.

Just have to trust the coaches that they see who is developing better.

The receivers were dropping balls, that weren't being intercepted. And why do we always call a pass play that has the receiver getting the ball at the line of scrimmage when its like 3rd and 8??!!!!

Aye Vey.....gonna be another tough season!
 
Lets start with the first fumble he had. It was a missed assignment by the RT. The next fumble he had was guess what another missed assignment by eather RB or RT. He even made better reads in the read options then worley. yes he did throw two interceptions but so did worley.

Dude....the Peterman train has left the station.
 
Troll. Peterman sucks in every facet. Blew his one & only shot. If he doesn't play we most likely win. Oh yea he's slow as hell too. Not sure how he's more mobile than Worley.

Look, Peterman played poorly on Saturday, but temper the criticism a little bit would ya? Great kid, hard worker, great teammate by all accounts. He's somebody's son and there's no doubt he wanted to do nothing other than play great. We should all realize that he's only 19 years old and cut him some slack.
 
Look, Peterman played poorly on Saturday, but temper the criticism a little bit would ya? Great kid, hard worker, great teammate by all accounts. He's somebody's son and there's no doubt he wanted to do nothing other than play great. We should all realize that he's only 19 years old and cut him some slack.

:good!: Peterman would be the first to admit he didnt have his best game, but he is still a VOL!
 
OP, he was worse than any statistic...and I do it for a living. The DATA...doesn't do justice to what happened to that kid. He's not ready. Period.
 
My first thought when reading the thread title was OP has to be right because there is no human that could have been worse than 5 passing yards and 4 turnovers in a half!
 

VN Store



Back
Top