NCAA to release sanctions/penalties against Penn State Monday Morning

#253
#253
omghulkhands said:
You still don't follow me

There is not TV contract if you aren't a part of the NCAA because you won't be able to play against the other teams, so they can and will do what they want if you want and you just have to accept it if you want to remain a part of the NCAA
Click to expand...

So you're not saying that the NCAA is the source of money, only that they can cause it to dry up with mafia-like tactics.

Sweet.
 
#259
#259
bamawriter said:
It would be clear and reasonable if it were clearly against the bylaws.

One could argue that paying a football coach 4 times as much as the school's president is putting the interests of the athletic department ahead of the university, but no one would think to punish that.
Click to expand...

And it would be a stupid argument.
 
#263
#263
why is this bama fans panties all in a bunch?? they did what they had to do psu also signed off on the sanctions so what is the problem??
 
#264
#264
omghulkhands said:
I am not going to get into that, but I just wanted to make it clear that forcing them to pay money is absolutely within their reach regardless of the ethics involved in doing it
Click to expand...

Again I ask: why should it be up to the NCAA to decide where the money goes?
 
#267
#267
Vols4life said:
why is this bama fans panties all in a bunch?? they did what they had to do psu also signed off on the sanctions so what is the problem??
Click to expand...

Link?

The press release, nor Emmert's statement, suggests that Penn State approved these measures. Nor has anyone from Penn State said as much.
 
#270
#270
cncchris33 said:
They lose 90 scholarships over the next 5 years. 10 initially and 20 per year over the next 4 years. That's quite a bit more than USC.
Click to expand...

I only heard the report on the radio. Thanks for the clarification.


A guy just made a great point on the radio about why the wins should vacated.

He pointed out that Penn St did gain a competitive edge in these games by covering this up. Since they covered it up recruits that went there wouldn't have gone there had this been known. Great point
 
#272
#272
bamawriter said:
Again I ask: why should it be up to the NCAA to decide where the money goes?
Click to expand...

I could be mistaken but, all the schools choose to be a part of the NCAA. When I attended Lipscomb University they were not a part of the NCAA yet. While I was there that transition happened. Many Lipscomb officials talked about how happy they were to join and how proud they were to join the NCAA.

I don't particularly care for a lot that the NCAA does, but unless schools are willing to leave hem or form a union of some sorts then things won't change
 
#274
#274
pualsline said:
I only heard the report on the radio. Thanks for the clarification.


A guy just made a great point on the radio about why the wins should vacated.

He pointed out that Penn St did gain a competitive edge in these games by covering this up. Since they covered it up recruits that went there wouldn't have gone there had this been known. Great point
Click to expand...

I don't like Penn State, but that's a stretch.

I think other schools (& fans)just want to improve their records.
 
#275
#275
pualsline said:
I could be mistaken but, all the schools choose to be a part of the NCAA. When I attended Lipscomb University they were not a part of the NCAA yet. While I was there that transition happened. Many Lipscomb officials talked about how happy they were to join and how proud they were to join the NCAA.

I don't particularly care for a lot that the NCAA does, but unless schools are willing to leave hem or form a union of some sorts then things won't change
Click to expand...

Correct, they are not forced to do anything and can always just leave the NCAA
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top