New California bill. More insanity

[Volgolfer1618]

California Bill Would Give $1,000 Fines to Retailers With Separate 'Girls' and 'Boys' Toy Sections

They want fine businesses that have boy and girl sections?

 

[evillawyer]

California Bill Would Give $1,000 Fines to Retailers With Separate 'Girls' and 'Boys' Toy Sections

They want fine businesses that have boy and girl sections?

What's imsanity?

 

[0nelilreb]

What's imsanity?

Government forcing a business to be ran as it sees fit according to its desire to control every aspect of its sales and profits ? We can start there .

 

[ClearwaterVol]

Although, I am not opposed to the goal, it is a crappy bill that won't pass.

 

[Volgolfer1618]

Although, I am not opposed to the goal, it is a crappy bill that won't pass.

Why are you not opposed? You think there's no difference between boys and girls? Or are you mad that they're considered different?

 

[Grand Vol]

Although, I am not opposed to the goal, it is a crappy bill that won't pass.

You say that like they haven't passed stupid **** before...

 

[lawgator1]

I honestly never noticed signage in stores that said boys' or girls' sections.

 

[allvol123]

Although, I am not opposed to the goal, it is a crappy bill that won't pass.

The goal of having govt manage businesses?

 

[bamawriter]

I honestly never noticed signage in stores that said boys' or girls' sections.

You see it quite often in kids' clothing stores. But this bill doesn't address clothing.

 

[Grand Vol]

I honestly never noticed signage in stores that said boys' or girls' sections.

Unless you were buying toys for your kids or someone else, I'd hope you were staying out of the toy sections.

 

[Volgolfer1618]

Unless you were buying toys for your kids or someone else, I'd hope you were staying out of the toy sections.

Look on ebay and see how much adults sell toys for. Adults are buying popular toys and putting them on ebay for 2, 3 times the price. Its insane

 

[Volgolfer1618]

Unless you were buying toys for your kids or someone else, I'd hope you were staying out of the toy sections.

You can't judge. law could have been born that way

 

[Sea Ray]

I honestly never noticed signage in stores that said boys' or girls' sections.

Bingo. Hence this law is not necessary. A hallmark of big gov't

 

[LouderVol]

Unless you were buying toys for your kids or someone else, I'd hope you were staying out of the toy sections.

I am wherever the Legos are.

 

[utvolpj]

This is less insane than TN repubs attempting to force universities to limit free speech. But hey, keep complaining about signs

 

[RikidyBones]

I honestly never noticed signage in stores that said boys' or girls' sections.

I have two kids.. One of each of the two genders. I have not noticed signage, even when toys r us was a thing. It was more implied by the product groupings. As that is the case, this bill is dumb and not enforceable if CA is dumb enough to pass it. But if they enforce implied, it'll drive even more business out of CA. Like they don't do that enough.

 

[lawgator1]

Unless you were buying toys for your kids or someone else, I'd hope you were staying out of the toy sections.

LOL. Valid point.

Nah, I mean walking through the stores I just don't notice it. Someone mentioned clothing and actually I do think I've noticed that signage.

Meh, bill won't pass and doesn't matter. Beside, the world has more important things to worry about right now so its a goofy proposal. Also, same with Greene's latest stunt with the sign in the hallway. WGAF about this stuff right now. Now, if the state lawmakers on this bill instead proposed one about the need to deal with the national debt, or if Greene posted a sign in the hallway about that, I'd give them some props.

But as is just seems like both sides of this culture debate are just taking turns upstaging one another in utterly meaningless ways.

 

[lawgator1]

Bingo. Hence this law is not necessary. A hallmark of big gov't

A hallmark of a waste of time. As is the repport on it.

 

[allvol123]

A hallmark of a waste of time. As is the repport on it.

The reporting of it was not done with tax dollars, the legislator's salary is done with tax dollars. So the reporting of it is not a waste of time.

 

[lawgator1]

The reporting of it was not done with tax dollars, the legislator's salary is done with tax dollars. So the reporting of it is not a waste of time.

A report on an inconsequential bill with no chance of passage and published simply to stoke the fires of the other side of the issue.

Pointless.

 

[allvol123]

A report on an inconsequential bill with no chance of passage and published simply to stoke the fires of the other side of the issue.

Pointless.

No it isnt. People should be aware that their representatives are wasting their tax dollars writing bills that wont pass.

 

[TheDeeble]

No it isnt. People should be aware that their representatives are wasting their tax dollars writing bills that wont pass.

And the absurd things being proposed.

 

[Grand Vol]

Someone mentioned clothing and actually I do think I've noticed that signage.

Speaking of, what are you going to do for clothing now that Sears has pretty much shut down?

 

[Grand Vol]

I am wherever the Legos are.

I would have figured you for Erector Sets

 

[Sea Ray]

A report on an inconsequential bill with no chance of passage and published simply to stoke the fires of the other side of the issue.

Pointless.

This isn't Kansas Dorothy. It could pass in California