If the pot was on one of the players, then that person should be singled out and punished. If you can prove the others were smoking, then punish them. The severity of the punishment depends on your expectations for the program. I myself think it is ludicrous in this day and age to expect that four college age males out partying are not going to have some pot (and no, I don't smoke and never have), but I know that there are varying opinions and as my boss used to say, "I have strong opinions, but that doesn't make them right". However, the gun issue is clearer in my mind. Like it or not, without any regard to special treatment for college bball players, the fact that they were in a rental car, that had actually been borrowed, does create reasonable doubt. Ask yourself this, if this happened to your kid, would you want them convicted on that evidence? I know that it is likely that the players had the guns, but from a legal standpoint, it is a nightmare for a prosecutor. You have a high profile defendant(s), charged with a somewhat nebulous charge that even has constitutional implications, who is going to have a very good atty. and public opinion is against you. It is a lose-lose situation for an elected official.