Thanks for posting this. I knew about a couple of these, but didn't realize it happened so frequently. Probably because UConn is rarely not a #1 seed, so it wasn't as noticeable when they were the "underdog" in Bridgeport or Albany.This was posted on another board. It seems that lower seeds get home court advantage quite frequently:
In 2019, Louisville was the #1 seed in Bridgeport. In the same regional, UConn was #2. Mississippi State was the #1 seed in Portland, with Oregon as #2. Baylor was the #1 seed in Greensboro with NC State at #3 and SC at #4.
In 2018, Notre Dame was the #1 seed in Spokane. In the same regional, Oregon was #2.
In 2017, Note Dame was the #1 seed in Lexington, KY (their closest regional), but they let Kentucky stay home as the #4 seed.
In 2016, Notre Dame was the #1 seed in Lexington, KY (their closest regional), but they let Kentucky stay home as the #3 seed.
Then, going back to 2000 and just looking at UConn's seeding/parings...
In 2014, UConn was the #1 seed in Lincoln, NE. In the same regional, Nebraska was the #4 and Oklahoma was the #10. Same year, South Carolina was the #1 seed ON STANFORD'S HOME FLOOR with Stanford as the #2 seed.
In 2010, UConn was the #1 seed in Dayton, OH. In the same regional, Ohio State was the #2 seed.
In 2007, UConn was the #1 seed in Fresno, CA. In the same regional, Stanford was the #2 seed.
In 2003, UConn was the #1 seed in Dayton, OH. In the same regional, Purdue (~3 hours from Dayton) was the #2 seed. Same, year, LSU was the #1 seed on Stanford's home floor with Stanford as the #3 seed.
In 2000, UConn was the #1 seed in Richmond, VA. In the same regional, Duke (~2 from Richmond) was the #2 seed.
I still think that the S-Curve should be done away with. Make it transparent: 1-8, 2-7, 3-6, 4-5. If you end up with a lower seed in a favorable region, so be it. But don't "gift" it to them.