Obama Breaks Spending Record

#4
#4
And managed to save all those those jobs by spending roughly 10% of that stimulus to date. Who cares where the rest of it went or is going to go,he has been a resounding success. I wish all those bigoted and racist citizens would get on board already, his policies are as sound as they come.
 
#6
#6
And you know he's really screwed things up when the hollywood folk start hatin' on him. I now have a new found respect for Angelina Jolie.

Published: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 at 20:10 IST
London: The gorgeous actress of Hollywood Angelina Jolie hates US President Barack Obama because she thinks that he is a 'socialist in disguise', as the sources have revealed.

The 34-year-old actress, who is a Goodwill Ambassador for the United Nation Refugee Agency, allegedly disapproves the policies of US president Barrack Obama.

Us magazine has also reported according to a close source to the star, "She hates him. She's into education and rehabilitation and thinks Obama is all about welfare and handouts. She thinks Obama is really a socialist in disguise."

The source has also added, "Angie isn't Republican, but she thinks Obama is all smoke and mirrors."
 
#7
#7
T-TownVol said:
Tell that to 9 of my installers that I have sitting home with nothing to do.
Click to expand...

Don't start talking real world examples. Ideals and spin don't work that way. Empty suits don't lend themselves to the tangible world very well.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#8
#8
IBlvNTmWrk said:
And you know he's really screwed things up when the hollywood folk start hatin' on him. I now have a new found respect for Angelina Jolie.

Published: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 at 20:10 IST
London: The gorgeous actress of Hollywood Angelina Jolie hates US President Barack Obama because she thinks that he is a 'socialist in disguise', as the sources have revealed.

The 34-year-old actress, who is a Goodwill Ambassador for the United Nation Refugee Agency, allegedly disapproves the policies of US president Barrack Obama.

Us magazine has also reported according to a close source to the star, "She hates him. She's into education and rehabilitation and thinks Obama is all about welfare and handouts. She thinks Obama is really a socialist in disguise."

The source has also added, "Angie isn't Republican, but she thinks Obama is all smoke and mirrors."
Click to expand...

SJolie was an idiot before Obama and is still an idiot.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#9
#9
BigPapaVol said:
Don't start talking real world examples. Ideals and spin don't work that way. Empty suits don't lend themselves to the tangible world very well.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

How dare you speak about Obama that way. These nine employees were obviously expendable and obviously worked for an uncaring, rich employer who made millions while they suffered and toiled barely scraping by. No doubt they are much better off now.
 
#10
#10
BigPapaVol said:
Don't start talking real world examples. Ideals and spin don't work that way. Empty suits don't lend themselves to the tangible world very well.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

My bad, I should have applied for me sum of that guv'ment money.
 
#11
#11
Obama and Bush break spending record would be a more credible way to word this headline. The article even admits that Bush was president for almost 1/4 of the time period they are using.
 
#12
#12
KB5252 said:
How dare you speak about Obama that way. These nine employees were obviously expendable and obviously worked for an uncaring, rich employer who made millions while they suffered and toiled barely scraping by. No doubt they are much better off now.
Click to expand...

Good point. We need more bottom feeders anyway. How else will this bottom up economy work?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#13
#13
KB5252 said:
How dare you speak about Obama that way. These nine employees were obviously expendable and obviously worked for an uncaring, rich employer who made millions while they suffered and toiled barely scraping by. No doubt they are much better off now.
Click to expand...

not this year or next the way it is looking
 
#14
#14
KB5252 said:
And managed to save all those those jobs by spending roughly 10% of that stimulus to date. Who cares where the rest of it went or is going to go,he has been a resounding success. I wish all those bigoted and racist citizens would get on board already, his policies are as sound as they come.
Click to expand...

You haven't yet realized that the dems are purposely holding the other 90% until 2011? They don't want to boost the economy to soon because they want to make sure the economy, unemployment, and other indicators are trending positive going into the 2012 elections.
 
#15
#15
a recent sf chronicle article (possibly the most obama ball washing publication in the world) said that of the stimulus money given to the bay area the cost was $600K per job. also obama's report lists 2,000 jobs saved in 2 districts that don't exist.
 
#16
#16
droski said:
a recent sf chronicle article (possibly the most obama ball washing publication in the world) said that of the stimulus money given to the bay area the cost was $600K per job. also obama's report lists 2,000 jobs saved in 2 districts that don't exist.
Click to expand...

these are in those "other" 7 states that BHO rules over
 
#17
#17
HendersonVol said:
Obama and Bush break spending record would be a more credible way to word this headline. The article even admits that Bush was president for almost 1/4 of the time period they are using.
Click to expand...

Oh yes, because we all know that Bush would have been given partial credit if the spending was actually down significantly.
 
#18
#18
HendersonVol said:
Obama and Bush break spending record would be a more credible way to word this headline. The article even admits that Bush was president for almost 1/4 of the time period they are using.
Click to expand...

Bush had nothing to do with spending over the last half of his second term.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#19
#19
KB5252 said:
Oh yes, because we all know that Bush would have been given partial credit if the spending was actually down significantly.
Click to expand...

If spending was down significantly, Fox would have certainly never written this article and MSNBC would have given Bush no partial credit. I'm just saying it would be more credible if the facts were represented better. I'd actually like to see a breakdown of how much of the spending was planned by Bush and Obama. They don't care about reporting facts. They are just pushing the agenda.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top