JTrainDavis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2006
- Messages
- 24,398
- Likes
- 20
The TP has good tenets if the religious idiots like Palin and this chick GTFO.
The TP has good tenets if the religious idiots like Palin and this chick GTFO.
Nice. Keep it classy guy.
Good grief. Where do you people get off? You'd be the first to object to someone denying you a say because you aren't religious but the first to deny someone else a say because of their religion... and your biggest problem with Christians is probably their hypocrisy, right?
Neither is she.Not a witch,
I think she actually said that the spread of AIDS was associated with the sexual revolution... which is a valid cause-effect association.don't blame AIDS on taking the Bible out of schools,
and don't equate masturbation with adultery.
Next?
I don't give a damn if they worship tree branches and cattle, but I don't want to hear about it, and it has no place in political discourse.
I am not talking about the imposition of religion and neither are they. I am talking about the perfectly valid and historically American act of deriving political beliefs from a worldview shaped by strongly held religious beliefs. Read the founders. Many made absolutely no bones about the fact that they believed their political views to be congruent with and subject to their orthodox Christian beliefs.
Link???At some point, people are going to realize that the portion of the TP that is actually focused on financial reform is tiny, tiny, tiny.
The portion that parrots that, doesn't understand it, but figures it gives them cover to push a world view based on 1953 America, is much, much, bigger.
I don't give a damn if they worship tree branches and cattle, but I don't want to hear about it, and it has no place in political discourse.
Neither is she. I think she actually said that the spread of AIDS was associated with the sexual revolution... which is a valid cause-effect association.
So if she said that homosexuals should be allowed to marry then that is a valid moral pov... or that NAMBLA deserves to be heard... or that sexual promiscuity is so compulsory that 2nd graders should have graphic sex ed and learn that it is OK to touch... she would be very modern and sophisticated? But if she expresses a pov that encourages self control of thoughts and urges then she should be denigrated, right?
Matthew 5:27-29
27Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery:
28But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.
Thoughts lead to attitudes. Attitudes determine actions.
Control your thoughts... control your actions.
No. And I challenge you to show more than a handful were professing deists.Most of the founders were demagogic deists.
The BoR was influenced by English common law, which was around before the Bible made its way to the British Isles.
Because her remarkable naivete and overly simplistic view of the world, bordering on reflecting mild retardation, is startlingly representative of the TP.
BTW, what does any of the mud being slung at O'Donnell have to do with the countries immediate problems? Could it be just one more proof that the left wants to talk about anything but the actual issues and ideas?
BTW, what does any of the mud being slung at O'Donnell have to do with the countries immediate problems? Could it be just one more proof that the left wants to talk about anything but the actual issues and ideas?