FleeceItOut
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2012
- Messages
- 5,004
- Likes
- 3,241
The cut line is just above illinois?
If so I think Rhode is way too low and you know my stance on Syracuse
You can exit out the same door, personally I enjoy keeping track of it and because I was so involved before seeing how it shapes up interest me.
Also, I 100% believe this (nobody else has to), if Tennessee wins their last 2 and the way things are going they are going to find themselves in the discussion again. They'd need to do work in the SECT, but I believe if Tennessee wins out and these other teams continue stumbling things could get interesting.
They have to win the SEC Tournament.
They are not getting an at-large.
Finishing 7th or 8th and going .500 in a league that is not well respected......it ain't happening.
What people are hanging their hat on is the strength of schedule. And that's nice, but they didn't beat any of those teams. I know they came close, but they didn't get a win. Best OOC win based on RPI is to a Kansas State team that is 6-10 in their league.
And Syracuse is in.
That's simply not true, Vols go 3-1 and are sitting 19-15 with a RPI in the 40's and they've got a much better chance of getting in than being left out.
Vandy loses their last 2, Illinois splits, UGA splits, WF drops their last 2, Syracuse loses to GT...who is in?
He said a 15 loss team is getting in and I agree. I think it's Vandy.
You made a post a few posts up that said a 15 loss team ain't getting in.
Based on that statement, Tennessee has to win out including the SEC Tourney
My bad. The whole reading thing.
I don't want to be misunderstood here.
I think, in a just world, Tennessee gets in. I think a 2 point loss on the road to North Carolina should mean more than a win against a chump squad somewhere.
I like the description Jay Bilas has used. All these bubble teams have proven they can lose. So, who have you beaten?
The win over Kentucky. The games against Oregon, Wisconsin, and North Carolina, while losses, should mean something.
So, I can make a case for Tennessee.
I'm just pretty damn sure the committee won't see it that way.
That's the thing, there's no telling wtf the committee is gonna do because something that's never happened is going to. Whether that's a new record for RPI getting in, or 15 loss teams, or teams not +4 in the win column I'm not sure...this type of year hasn't ever happened so no clue what committee will do.
Just curious since you have looked at this stuff, how are so many majors who are not performing going to get these bids.
What has happened to the mid majors? Are there no quality mid majors out there having a 23-7 season worthy of consideration?
That's the thing, there's no telling wtf the committee is gonna do because something that's never happened is going to. Whether that's a new record for RPI getting in, or 15 loss teams, or teams not +4 in the win column I'm not sure...this type of year hasn't ever happened so no clue what committee will do.