bleedingTNorange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 73,819
- Likes
- 49,648
Only scenario I found that would get us back into the 40s was:RPIWizard is giving me an RPI in the mid-50s by winning the next two and then two in the SECT.
Compare this UT team to UF last year -- UF finished 19-14 (9-9) with an RPI of 55 and Top 25 wins over West Virginia and St. Joe's.
At some point a certain amount of losses might be too many.
I don't disagree that we still have a very small change of making it; at this point I have little faith we're going to actually win the games needed. The way we've played lately, I think winning at LSU will be a struggle. We're limping to the finish line.
RPIWizard is giving me an RPI in the mid-50s by winning the next two and then two in the SECT.
Compare this UT team to UF last year -- UF finished 19-14 (9-9) with an RPI of 55 and Top 25 wins over West Virginia and St. Joe's.
At some point a certain amount of losses might be too many.
Eh -- Lunardi is notoriously slow in adjusting the bubble. He's still hanging on to Tennessee but makes no mention of Illinois, who has become a legit bubble team. Most others have moved Tennessee off the S-curve entirely, and I'm sure Lunardi will follow suit.
UT isn't making the field with 15 losses. Vandy could, but Vandy has better wins, a better computer profile, and a better conference record. And even then, we're banking on the committee doing something for the first time ever. Don't hold your breath.
If that happens they're done. I think they split, though.
And UF was likely one of the very first teams left out, this post basically proves my point. This years bubble is on pace to be worse than last years if it continues, a 15 loss team is likely getting in IMO.