Official Fire Dave Hart Petition..........

#401
#401
Lets just say ole Debby won't be finding herself in the 'Ladies of UT' thread anytime soon.

409669_t607.JPG
 
#403
#403
AJeray4TN said:
Lets just say ole Debby won't be finding herself in the 'Ladies of UT' thread anytime soon.

409669_t607.JPG
Click to expand...

Do you know what this heffer did and why did they fire her? Getting paid to do nothing but eat the profits from the consession stand?
 
Last edited:
#404
#404
Slydell said:
Not sure who is doing the damage here. Still waiting for the other shoe to drop.
Click to expand...

The damage is being done by Pat Summitt's affidavit, which some lawyer wrote up to be as explosive as possible, while weaseling out with item #7 in which she admits to the possibility of a misunderstanding without saying whether there was one or not. It's accusatory without committing to anything. And the national news stories are already starting. By signing her name to that affidavit, she's damaging UT's reputation.
 
#405
#405
Vercingetorix said:
The damage is being done by Pat Summitt's affidavit, which some lawyer wrote up to be as explosive as possible, while weaseling out with item #7 in which she admits to the possibility of a misunderstanding without saying whether there was one or not. It's accusatory without committing to anything. And the national news stories are already starting. By signing her name to that affidavit, she's damaging UT's reputation.
Click to expand...

That is only your opinion of the matter and she didn't admit to a possibility of a misunderstanding. It's on Hart to clear it up which I assume that he will. She said that Hart indicated that she misinterpreted what he said. Big difference to me.
 
#407
#407
Slydell said:
That is only your opinion of the matter and she didn't admit to a possibility of a misunderstanding. It's on Hart to clear it up which I assume that he will. She said that Hart indicated that she misinterpreted what he said. Big difference to me.
Click to expand...

I thought it was on Hart to pay her over 300k a year, continue to give her an office/title/privileges, and healthcare for life?
 
#409
#409
Slydell said:
That is only your opinion of the matter and she didn't admit to a possibility of a misunderstanding. It's on Hart to clear it up which I assume that he will. She said that Hart indicated that she misinterpreted what he said. Big difference to me.
Click to expand...

If she's not admitting the possibility of a misunderstanding, why is point #7 in the affidavit at all? It seems like its only purpose is to get in the part about "unbeknownst to the individuals I shared this upsetting news" [sic] -- ie, the plaintiff in the lawsuit. It's deliberately vague about whether there might have been a misunderstanding or not; the only thing it wants to be clear about is that Debby Jennings didn't hear anything else after the initial "upsetting news."

A lawyer wrote this affidavit, not Pat Summitt. If a lawyer is deliberately vague about something, I assume there's a reason. S/he was certainly specific about everything else.
 
#410
#410
Vercingetorix said:
If she's not admitting the possibility of a misunderstanding, why is point #7 in the affidavit at all? It seems like its only purpose is to get in the part about "unbeknownst to the individuals I shared this upsetting news" [sic] -- ie, the plaintiff in the lawsuit. It's deliberately vague about whether there might have been a misunderstanding or not.

A lawyer wrote this affidavit, not Pat Summitt. If a lawyer is deliberately vague about something, I assume there's a reason. He was certainly specific about everything else.
Click to expand...

I said this before. I'll say it again. It seems like Pat was trying to help a friend out and Jennings and her lawyers were misleading Pat.

If true, then Debbie Jennings is a piece of ****.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#411
#411
zjcvols said:
I said this before. I'll say it again. It seems like Pat was trying to help a friend out and Jennings and her lawyers were misleading Pat.

If true, then Debbie Jennings is a piece of ****.
Click to expand...

Yep. I don't even want to say likely. It's obvious that this has happend.
 
#412
#412
zjcvols said:
I said this before. I'll say it again. It seems like Pat was trying to help a friend out and Jennings and her lawyers were misleading Pat.

If true, then Debbie Jennings is a piece of ****.
Click to expand...

If this proves true, I'll completely agree with ya, Z.

But, for now it's all lawyer talk on both sides.
 
#413
#413
Slydell said:
If this proves true, I'll completely agree with ya, Z.

But, for now it's all lawyer talk on both sides.
Click to expand...

Of course. However, right now. all we can do is speculate and think of hypotheticals.

That is what a message board is for. :)
 
#414
#414
zjcvols said:
Of course. However, right now. all we can do is speculate and think of hypotheticals.

That is what a message board is for. :)
Click to expand...

I know. It just bothers me that some are projecting their opinions and hypothetical as facts. We've both been here long enough to know it's the norm.

What did you do, take the entire day off today? You've been busy.
 
#416
#416
Slydell said:
I know. It just bothers me that some are projecting their opinions and hypothetical as facts. We've both been here long enough to know it's the norm.

What did you do, take the entire day off today? You've been busy.
Click to expand...

I had two classes cancelled and skipped my last one. I went to my poli class and didn't have work today. I have work at 7 AM, but the Braves WC is tomorrow and I can't sleep. Dammit it all.
 
#418
#418
zjcvols said:
Nope. Not at all. It's bad for the university. Hell, it's becoming a national news story already.
Click to expand...

It will turn international if not already. We have a lot of UT fans scattered around the world. Wit Pat receiving all the awards and accolades lately, that draws a lot more attention. Today, I can't agree that pub is always good.
 
#419
#419
Slydell said:
I know. It just bothers me that some are projecting their opinions and hypothetical as facts. We've both been here long enough to know it's the norm.

What did you do, take the entire day off today? You've been busy.
Click to expand...

Everyone wanting to haul out the pitchforks and lynch David Hart for forcing Pat Summitt out against her will is "projecting their opinions and hypotheticals as facts" too. It's a deliberately explosive affidavit that deliberately equivocates at the end. None of us knows what happened. Yet lots of folks already want Hart fired for it.
 
#421
#421
zjcvols said:
I had two classes cancelled and skipped my last one. I went to my poli class and didn't have work today. I have work at 7 AM, but the Braves WC is tomorrow and I can't sleep. Dammit it all.
Click to expand...

You'll manage. I'm sure of that. Strong constitution.:good!:
 
#422
#422
zjcvols said:
Nope. Not at all. It's bad for the university. Hell, it's becoming a national news story already.
Click to expand...

The bad thing about it is, it has the potential to get a whole lot worse, especially if it is found out that Hart had a say in her departure.
 
#423
#423
Vercingetorix said:
Everyone wanting to haul out the pitchforks and lynch David Hart for forcing Pat Summitt out against her will is "projecting their opinions and hypotheticals as facts" too. It's a deliberately explosive affidavit that deliberately equivocates at the end. None of us knows what happened. Yet lots of folks already wants Hart fired for it.
Click to expand...

I agree that none of us knows. That's what continues to stir it.
 
#424
#424
Vercingetorix said:
Everyone wanting to haul out the pitchforks and lynch David Hart for forcing Pat Summitt out against her will is "projecting their opinions and hypotheticals as facts" too. It's a deliberately explosive affidavit that deliberately equivocates at the end. None of us knows what happened. Yet lots of folks already want Hart fired for it.
Click to expand...

You've nailed it right on the head. People are reacting too quickly to this.
 
#425
#425
Slydell said:
I know. It just bothers me that some are projecting their opinions and hypothetical as facts. We've both been here long enough to know it's the norm.

What did you do, take the entire day off today? You've been busy.
Click to expand...

The reason this seems obvious to me is because nothing has been said by Pat until this stuff with Jennings came out. I know I could be wrong , but when she went on TV and said this was her decision and they gave her everything she needed going foward , I just don't see it any other way. She has been around and hasn't said one thing about this until now. I feel she is being used and may not even know it. I've had to deal with this in my own family and I didn't watch all of her games last year , but when I did she looked like she was somewhere else in her mind. It's a horrible thing. I think what was done was best for her and her family knew it. And I believe she did too. It's not like they told her she couldn't be around anymore. But what happens if she continues to coach in her condition? I think for her own health she needed to step aside. The timing of this tells us a lot. I also think she will have a tough time in court proving this because of her condition. It is a mental disease. Who are they going to believe? I know many here respect Pat , and I am one of them , but in court it doesn't matter how respected you are if you have mental health issues.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top