Official Global Warming thread (merged)

#7,051
#7,051
Persian Vol said:
https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

"Ice cores drawn from Greenland, Antarctica, and tropical mountain glaciers show that the Earth’s climate responds to changes in greenhouse gas levels. Ancient evidence can also be found in tree rings, ocean sediments, coral reefs, and layers of sedimentary rocks. This ancient, or paleoclimate, evidence reveals that current warming is occurring roughly ten times faster than the average rate of ice-age-recovery warming. "
Click to expand...

Curent warming compared to an average does not make current warming unprecedented.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7,055
#7,055
Biopsyman said:
Smart.. Another tax the american people do not need or want.. By the way NATO.. PAY UP
Click to expand...

Yes, smart. :thumbsup:

Really what we needed is to finally have something in common with Nicaragua an Syria.

9ceYvoBg.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 people
#7,061
#7,061
The Non-Existent Case for the Paris Accord

In this spirit, a piece in the liberal website Vox explained, the Paris accord “asks participants only to state what they are willing to do and to account for what they’ve done. It is, in a word, voluntary.” In other words, “Nothing to see here, just us climate-change alarmists playing pretend.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7,063
#7,063
Persian Vol said:
10x faster than average is a pretty significant anomaly.
Click to expand...

Agreed. And this is another gripe with the climate "scientists". Scientists are supposed to use exact words. You will be trained to do that too in your patient notes.

When "scientists" claim something is unprecedented it means it has never been observed before. They cant claim unprecedented change compared to an average. They can claim an unprecedented average compared to another average. My skepticism with anthropological climate change is unprecedented.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#7,064
#7,064
Persian Vol said:
So you don't believe scientists? What exactly is the reason toward this skepticism?
Click to expand...

There is no complete agreement on all of this. You can put whatever article you want claiming whatever % of scientists agree with whatever. Those stats and polls are almost always biased. How many scientists were polled? Did they all have experience in global climate science? If so, how much? Whats their accreditation? How long have they been in their field? You see? These polls could have polled 3000 scientists and only a small % of them actually have experience in climate science.

There is no real, logical way to determine what the climate was like 2-3 billion years ago. Or even a couple hundred million years ago. So we only have a very small sample size to use in comparison.

If you are not skeptical of climate science, then I really dont know what to tell you.
 
#7,065
#7,065
luthervol said:
We take another step forward into becoming a global laughing stock.
Click to expand...

You must not have traveled internationally much in the past 20 years huh? Got news for you. You want to make it sound like Trump is making us look stupid. The rest of the world has been laughing at us for the past 20 years at least. I mean, we had a sissy for the past 8 years. America has been a laughing stock for a long time. Trump is no worse than the last 4 idiots we have had occupying the toilet bowl known as 1600 Pennsylvania avenue.

Keep up your agenda though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#7,066
#7,066
For the 50 million Obama left on Food Stamps and the lowest labor participation rate in 30 years.. Most will rather have a job
 
#7,068
#7,068
BigOrangeTrain said:
There is no complete agreement on all of this. You can put whatever article you want claiming whatever % of scientists agree with whatever. Those stats and polls are almost always biased. How many scientists were polled? Did they all have experience in global climate science? If so, how much? Whats their accreditation? How long have they been in their field? You see? These polls could have polled 3000 scientists and only a small % of them actually have experience in climate science.

There is no real, logical way to determine what the climate was like 2-3 billion years ago. Or even a couple hundred million years ago. So we only have a very small sample size to use in comparison.

If you are not skeptical of climate science, then I really dont know what to tell you.
Click to expand...

It's very sad, and quite disturbing, that there are still climate change skeptics posting nonsense like the above when there is overwhelming evidence that proves, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that man-made climate change exists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#7,069
#7,069
TN Ribs said:
It's very sad, and quite disturbing, that there are still climate change skeptics posting nonsense like the above when there is overwhelming evidence that proves, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that man-made climate change exists.
Click to expand...

Your assumptions are as worthless as your political views. You probably believe it anytime you read "97% of scientists agree."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#7,071
#7,071
BigOrangeTrain said:
You must not have traveled internationally much in the past 20 years huh? Got news for you. You want to make it sound like Trump is making us look stupid. The rest of the world has been laughing at us for the past 20 years at least. I mean, we had a sissy for the past 8 years. America has been a laughing stock for a long time. Trump is no worse than the last 4 idiots we have had occupying the toilet bowl known as 1600 Pennsylvania avenue.

Keep up your agenda though.
Click to expand...

It has less to do with our Presidents and more to do with the ignorance and arrogance of our population. But don't let that get in the way of your agenda.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#7,072
#7,072
BigOrangeTrain said:
There is no complete agreement on all of this. You can put whatever article you want claiming whatever % of scientists agree with whatever. Those stats and polls are almost always biased. How many scientists were polled? Did they all have experience in global climate science? If so, how much? Whats their accreditation? How long have they been in their field? You see? These polls could have polled 3000 scientists and only a small % of them actually have experience in climate science.

There is no real, logical way to determine what the climate was like 2-3 billion years ago. Or even a couple hundred million years ago. So we only have a very small sample size to use in comparison.

If you are not skeptical of climate science, then I really dont know what to tell you.
Click to expand...


Very sad that such ignorance exists in America today. BOT, are you even aware the earth is round?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#7,073
#7,073
MT LeConte said:
Very sad that such ignorance exists in America today. BOT, are you even aware the earth is round?
Click to expand...

Yeah climate science is completely settled. Humans did it all because the majority agrees. The sun doesnt have anything to do with it. Its completely unnatural whats going and we can prove it. My God, do you just blindly believe everything you hear or read?

Oh wait...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7,074
#7,074
MT LeConte said:
Very sad that such ignorance exists in America today. BOT, are you even aware the earth is round?
Click to expand...

There was a period in time that saw the transition from the vast majority of people believing the earth was flat to the vast majority believing it was round. In a way, you have to have a little respect for that last guy standing in the village screaming "I don't care what everybody says, I know the earth is flat."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top