Official Jon Gruden Thread VI

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd like to clarify some things with you, because I believe some information has been lost in translation with all the background noise here. I don't know if it matters, but its worth a shot.

My original information from someone in the circle that would know, was just this:

1. Dooley was notified after the MSU game that he would not return for 2013. He was told he could handle the remainder of the season on his terms. If he wanted to leave then he could, or he could coach UT out and leave after. If he wanted to go ahead announce it, and coach out the year, that was fine too. They gave him all the latitude in the world.


2. At the same time it was stated that the " job is Grudens'. Since then I've been told details about an agreement in principle. Gruden would jot acceot the position until one is publicly available. He likes Dooley and did not want to be seen to be angling for somebodies job behind the scenes.

I think where you have trouble with my info is where I have "connected the dots" to piece things together. My assertion that Dooley being let go was a condition for Gruden is based upon my understanding that no job would be accepted while he was a sitting coach. Nobody directly said that to me, but the conclusion can logically be leapt to. If you have information to the contrary I can understand your skepticism.

I'd love to tell you where this info came from, but I can't right now. When this plays out, no matter which way it goes, maybe I can in private. Maybe then you'll understand.

This was specifically to you Bruin.....if I get sidelined by flaming posters I'll get back to you later.

Good post. Your good people as I said before and I thank you for the post. My stance that DD doesn't know is based on a number of things most have already been posted.

All you say about JG agreeing but not willing to do it publicly until DD is officially gone is very believable without agreeing that DD has already been told.

So we aren't very far from a agreeing with each other!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Yeah I have a bet with my stepfather that Dooley is canned and Jon Gruden is hired. 2 separate bets for 2 steak dinners. So I jump at the chance to get the scoop. ha Just a concerned volfan

What happens if Dooley is canned, but no Gruden?
 
Dumb question and totally wrong forum but gonna ask it anyway. Is there still an outside smoking area at TBA for UT basketball games?
 
Gruden VI! Hell yes!

Anything new going on today? Doesn't look like the thread has been invaded by "the others" yet...
 
Good post. Your good people as I said before and I thank you for the post. My stance that DD doesn't know is based on a number of things most have already been posted.

All you say about JG agreeing but not willing to do it publicly until DD is officially gone is very believable without agreeing that DD has already been told.

So we aren't very far from a agreeing with each other!

I'm totally fine with skepticism. The Gotcha game, and hostility from others, is what bothers me. I'm not personally invested in anyone else's opinion....I'm not here to lobby or convince.

What I posted here is completely consistent with what I posted a month ago. This was my original info, from my first hand source. I have spoken with others in here with different sources that corroborated mine, and brought additional info to the table that I believe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Good post. Your good people as I said before and I thank you for the post. My stance that DD doesn't know is based on a number of things most have already been posted.

All you say about JG agreeing but not willing to do it publicly until DD is officially gone is very believable without agreeing that DD has already been told.

So we aren't very far from a agreeing with each other!

"mamma's good people"!
 
Especially considering that information that could jeopardize those 5 million reasons was made public. Even though it was rumor. I think that leaked for a reason. Just playing hardball.

So a contract gives a person 5mil if there aren't retained but once they are told they aren't going to be retained they have to keep quiet in order to get that 5mil??


That your stance?
 
Jayzus jumping Christ on a whole wheat cracker.....another slobber over Gru-bage thread?? Weren't the first 6,000,000 posts enough?? Y'all have no shame. Seriously.


#grudenisGARBAGE
 
I'm totally fine with skepticism. The Gotcha game, and hostility from others, is what bothers me. I'm not personally invested in anyone else's opinion....I'm not here to lobby or convince.

What I posted here is completely consistent with what I posted a month ago. This was my original info, from my first hand source. I have spoken with others in here with different sources that corroborated mine, and brought additional info to the table that I believe.

I can attest to the fact that this is not some elaborate hoax perpetuated by a few people. I have heard too much from too many completely unrelated people...almost simultaneously..I might add.
 
So a contract gives a person 5mil if there aren't retained but once they are told they aren't going to be retained they have to keep quiet in order to get that 5mil??


That your stance?

Bruin, would this make sense?

HART: Derek, we are not retaining you after this year. Let's negotiate a lower buyout than $5 million and we will let you go now.

DD: He!! no, I want my $5 million.

HART: Okay then, have it your way. Enjoy coaching the rest of the season as a lame duck. We will fire you after the last game.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top