bleedingTNorange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 74,098
- Likes
- 50,320
I was waiting to hear something....
You were the one saying they get an at large earlier today haha
Hopefully you're right and they're out though.
Oh hey, South Florida lost by 23 to VCU, who Drexel beat during the regular season. But no, let's get some more 12/13 loss teams into the tournament!
I'm not here to get into an argument. But tell me this: who would you rather see in the NCAA Tournament? A 13-loss power conference team that you pretty much know what you're getting from or a 5 or 6 loss mid-major squad that has a much higher upside?
Because scheduling is as easy as snapping your fingers and saying "hey, Syracuse, let's play on Friday, baby."
IMO the big conference team. They play in the big leagues and what they have done is more impressive.
If Iona or mtsu don't want to get passed up for at large bids, then join a big boy conference or schedule a better OOC.
Not fair to punish miss st or usf for playing in a good conference. Much the same as BCS.
Would you have rather seen Houston and Lsu if Houston had gone undefeated???
I have Drexel right behind Tennessee right now, moving the Vols to 2nd team out. Still have Iona in, and the VCU win definitely helped them.
I also think that if Cal wins the Pac-12 tourney, it's a one bid league with Washington dropping out of my bracket and opening up another at large spot.
Seton Hall, Northwestern, Texas, and Xavier are right at the edge, and I think 1 or 2 probably do not get the wins they need to get them over the hump. Drexel definitely has an opportunity to sneak in.
I don't think any big conference team has been punished for playing in a good conference. The argument against a team like Northwestern is "because they play in a good conference, they got 11 opportunities against top 50 opponents. They won exactly one of those. Why should going 1-10 against the top 50 mean the same as going 1-1 against the top 50 like Drexel.
I have Drexel right behind Tennessee right now, moving the Vols to 2nd team out. Still have Iona in, and the VCU win definitely helped them.
I also think that if Cal wins the Pac-12 tourney, it's a one bid league with Washington dropping out of my bracket and opening up another at large spot.
Seton Hall, Northwestern, Texas, and Xavier are right at the edge, and I think 1 or 2 probably do not get the wins they need to get them over the hump. Drexel definitely has an opportunity to sneak in.
Memphis has the money, pull, and name recognition to play anyone anywhere. You're not able to do that if you're Iona or Drexel.
And why do you keep pulling Houston and LSU into this? It was obvious Houston wasn't at the level of LSU/Alabama/OKST/etc. It's not obvious in this sport.
I'm fine with northwestern not being in.
But usf and miss st at this point are deserving IMO.
I'm fine with northwestern not being in.
But usf and miss st at this point are deserving IMO.
Again, not here to argue; I just don't want to write this paper I haven't started on and I enjoy talking about basketball. But what has USF done to warrant a bid other than consistently losing to Top 25 teams? Also, MSU has been awful for the last month.
South Florida and Drexel both have 3 sub 100 losses. South Florida lost to Old Dominion who Drexel beat twice. South Florida is 1-9 against the top 50. Drexel is 1-1. South Florida has, as of right now, the lowest RPI loss of the two.
Just throwing a couple counter arguments out there.