Orangeslice13
RockyTop is back, Let’s Go!!
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2011
- Messages
- 93,214
- Likes
- 106,314
Gun accessibility doesn’t have to be the causative agent to present a solution to the problem. This is a logical fallacy.I haven't agreed with you too much in this thread, but I've learned a good bit regardless.
I did like how you kind of satirized the 'armed teacher deturence(?)' notion by contrasting it against their expectations regarding selecting curriculum and teaching sexuality.
I won't argue it in this thread anymore as it's already been argued in others, but implementing armed teachers as a deturence strategy is just plain F-ing stupid. It would eventually become a pyrhiic victory at best after the inevitable misfire. Do the people suggesting this actually look at ballistic reports from military and police engagements?
I'm going to disagree. The national rates of gun violence in homicides is less than that of the 80's, and the accessibility to obtain guns was less lenient in the 80's, yet school shootings were not occurring with even close to recent history's regularity.
Gun accessibility wasn't the causative precursor to the high gun homicide rates during the 80's. Cartel and gang drug wars, over crack cocaine in particular, were the causative precursors. Legal gun accessibility neither inflated nor decreased the rate to any notable degree during that period.
I personally believe we have a religious or spiritual crisis in our country and Evil is a driving factor in school shootings. I'll leave that statement isolated as spirituality is tough to argue in a politics forum.
We clearly have untreated mental health problems and too lenient sentencing for violent offenders effecting the school shootings as well.
A very close friend of mine was recently murdered during the past few months by a violent offender with a past history of violent crimes. Wrong place wrong time for my friend, But the scum bag that killed him shouldn't have been on the streets to begin with. It didn't involve a gun, and a good guy with a gun couldn't have saved my friend.
(If you want to send me a pm, or we'll figure out how to pm with mod help, and I'll send you articles and official reports to verify the veracity of what I just said)
Very simplistic idea that allows you to keep your head in the sand and ignore actual problems.
You prefer logic, here is a logical example I can apply: If a patient is crashing the worry is about what can be given now to save them, not the acute kidney injury that we’ll have to treat later from pushing fluids and medications. You treat the problem now, not potential hypothetical problems in the future. Logic.
Great post! It's the same folks who quickly gave up their freedom in liberal city's & states to go out in public or not allow businesses to open or walk on the beach or swim in the ocean because a tiny little man on a power trip conned dimocrat leaders.As i sat and watched on network TV...which very rarely happens in my home...as our government and police did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING as domestic rioters and terrorists burned and destroyed cesspool Dimwit controlled northern cities...1 after another....after another....i said 2 things loud and clear. Over and over.
1. This BS guarantees there will be NO gun grabbing legislation passed in MY lifetime...clearly families can only count on THEMSELVES to protect them from brutal murders, arson, widespread looting of hardworking folks entire livelihoods.....guns and ammo sales will go through the roof.
2. These fools will never try this bullsheit in rural America, nor down south unless in the few extremely liberal cities such as ATL and memphis. Country folks of all shapes, sizes, and skin tones will kill these mofos dead just like the animals we hunt long before we let them steal our property, hurt our friends and families, or burn and loot our towns and communities.
You wannabe gun grabbers must have lost your feckong minds....or have the shortest memories in history???
Wtf is wrong with you???
Seriously?
You want to surrender your rights and weapons as this country QUICKLY falls apart due to a lack of morals, responsibility, abd integrity......GO right ahead.
To even ASK the sane folks whose memory extends more than a year or 2 into the past to surrender ANY means to defend our rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is a FOOLS ERRAND. You can shove that request right up your crawl.
I am disappointed in the Republicans too...i watched a Godless liberal halfwit president stop pushing the gay agenda and for drivethru abortions long enough to actually paraphrase NIV scripture from a Bible he completely ignores ....in a press conference made solely to try and drum up support for new legislation intended to diminish OUR RIGHTS to own guns.....and the Republicans did what????
The VERY NEXT program on TV should have been nonstop footage of these animals burning, looting, destroying, assaulting. ...and murdering US citizens and their property. Over and over. These videos of the riots should roll without ceasing until these Dimwit dipsheits drop the subject completely. Make sure Americans and their short memories do NOT forget what police stood back and watched these animals (mostly white teens btw in many cases) did in some of the biggest cities in the US. What an embarrassment. The greatest country on Earth being destroyed from within for all the world to see. Simply because gun free cities under Dimwit rule had no means to defend themselves.
And you clowns seriously want to try and tell US what guns we shouldnt have anymore? Seriously???
Those who are too damn stupid to remember the past are doomed to repeat it. You will not doom the rest of us though.
Unless you can say definitively why mass shootings have started happening, the only thing that matters is that they are happening. Simple enough?We were treating the “ patients “ before the 1990s .. why did we stop ? See I like simplicity, it cuts down on all the bullsh!t and pandering. We didn’t have a mass shooting epidemic when I was growing up or into my young adulthood and we had more access to firearms then we do today , so in a very simple way I ask .. what changed ?
FYI.. the oogie boogie rifle that everyone is afraid of now ( AR-15) was first produced in 1959 .
I understand the rationale behind owning guns to defend yourself against foes, believe it or not I *gasp* agree with this notion. What I don’t understand is the absolutist position that in times of peace that we waive the deadly responsibility of owning a gun in favor of warding potential, future tyrannical governments. We clearly have a gun violence problem, and to be the greatest nation means addressing those problems instead of burring your head in the sand. Domestic gun violence is a clear and present danger, tyrannical domestic or foreign governments is a hypothetical problem.
He’s a liberal. He’s not about to let cold, hard facts derail his totally unsupported argument.I’m unaware of a gun problem. South Dakota has the second most guns and yet the least homicides. Maryland is one of the 10 lowest states in gun ownership and yet has the 3rd most homicides. There’s no correlation between homicide rates and gun ownership.
So why do you believe we have a gun problem?
Gun ownership isn’t a problem, responsible gun operation (or lack-there-of) is.I’m unaware of a gun problem. South Dakota has the second most guns and yet the least homicides. Maryland is one of the 10 lowest states in gun ownership and yet has the 3rd most homicides. There’s no correlation between homicide rates and gun ownership.
So why do you believe we have a gun problem?
You sound like you’ve got all the answers, so you tell me what changed?
No no, you rhetorically asked me what has changed, so teach me, what has changed?Deflection isn’t a good look for you . I’m the staunch 2a supporter remember? Maybe instead of screeching about it being a firearm problem we should look back at when it wasn’t a problem , for the answers . History / lessons and such .
The majority of homicides don’t involve guns.