OrangeWilly
>>---knee--->
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2007
- Messages
- 6,440
- Likes
- 1
no matter how you spin it, this team isn't very good. They are young and can improve although I don't think they'll improve into a Final Four team before most leave Rocky Top, but this team isn't very good. Horrible defense, bad shot selection and very piss poor free throw shooting technique. Someone has to become the dominant scoring threat that can bring this team back when they fall behind. I don't see anyone on this team capable of that. Perhaps two or three more recruits will make this team really dominant.
As of right now Scotty Hopson is nothing but overrated.
Why don't you take a quick poll on this site and you'll find that the overwhelming majority of the people (at least those that respond honestly) were predicting that UT would be an Elite 8 or Final 4 team THIS year.
Its pretty bad when you dog a team that has 5 or 6 first year players who have had major playing time this year....i mean we did lose jajuan smith and chris lofton. Thats about 40 points a game....i think you guys are a little bit spoiled. If anything you should praise bruce pearl for getting the major recruits we have gotten. Hopson is extremely good....dont knock the guy. I love how you old men get on here and talk about how horrible he is when he would run circles around you. Chances are hes not goin to the NBA after his first season. And plus KANSAS has a 30 somethin game win streak at home. Get over the loss. And yes we are a basketball school...have you heard of the LADY VOLS...damn some people are so ignorant...i predict this team to lose seven or eight but its the tournament that matters.....
Why don't you take a quick poll on this site and you'll find that the overwhelming majority of the people (at least those that respond honestly) were predicting that UT would be an Elite 8 or Final 4 team THIS year.
The two guards, Selby and Mcrae, could make Tenn dominant. From what I've heard Selby is a one and done. The way Tyler is playing he won't sniff the 1st round of the NBA. We could return all of our players next season. I believe we will be much improved next year.
That is an incredibly senseless statement.
We seem to get psyched out anytime we face an elite program and go on to lay an egg.
Coming from you - I couldn't care less.
So you think Memphis and Florida are elite basketball programs? I assume you still think Sam Gilbert never existed too, right?
Memphis was among the nations elite teams last year - but one year or a few years as great team and no National Titles doesn't make you an elite program like Kentucky, UNC, or Kansas.
It all depends on what you define as elite. Is Memphis a Top 5 program all time? No. Are they a Top 15 program all time? Yes. ESPN did a little countdown on this a few months back and said so. Over last 30 years, Tigers have been to 4 Sweet 16, 3 Elite 8, and 2 FF. That's a deep run every 3 years. Don't forget about the 1973 Runner Up also.
Florida is an elite program. Four Final Four appearances that include a Runner Up and 2 NC. That's 1 less NC than Duke and Kansas, as many as UConn and Louisville, and more than Georgetown.
We seem to get psyched out anytime we face an elite program and go on to lay an egg.
No, sorry. Florida is not an elite program. They had one of the rarest recruiting classes ever and combination of players that had amazing chemistry - and they happened to all stay an extra year. Two good runs doesn't make them elite.
Would you have considered them elite before their run? Heck no. Their run will never be repeated or anything close to what they did. It was a combination of every star in the universe aligning for Billy Donovan. They were considered chokers with lots of talent before those 2 teams... so no, Florida is not an elite program.
And I'd consider elite top 10 programs of all time.
Are you talking about Florida here, because this sounds a lot like the Duke team of the early 90s that went back to back also. Recruiting, chemistry, and players staying in school is rare, but that's how you make runs.
UCLA, Kentucky, Indiana, UNC, Kansas, and Duke are the only schools with more NC than Florida. NC State, Louisville, Okla. State, San Francisco, Uconn, Mich. State, and Cincinatti all have 2 NC as well. I would rate Louisville, UConn, Mich. State ahead of Fl.
Are you talking about Florida here, because this sounds a lot like the Duke team of the early 90s that went back to back also. Recruiting, chemistry, and players staying in school is rare, but that's how you make runs.
UCLA, Kentucky, Indiana, UNC, Kansas, and Duke are the only schools with more NC than Florida. NC State, Louisville, Okla. State, San Francisco, Uconn, Mich. State, and Cincinatti all have 2 NC as well. I would rate Louisville, UConn, Mich. State ahead of Fl.
On the Topic of Elite...I'd say anyone with Multiple National Titles, or 1 National title, with multiple Final Four Appearances. There are "fluke National Champions" such as Loyola-Chicago, Texas Southern, and etc. But teams that have 2 or more national titles, or appearances have proven that they are VERY competetive every year. And you need to remember that only 1 team can win per year, and only 4 teams can reach the final four per year. So saying a team hasn't been there in a while, or has only been there a few times isn't a solid argument against them, it is just a matter of numbers. As long as Tennessee basketball is Winning Conference Titles, and contending in the top 25 I will be happy for the rest of my life. I care SO MUCH MORE about Football, and that will never change. But if basketball is getting a VERY SOLID job done every year, who is complaining?
Congratulations on the bolded statement. But most of us Vol fans would like to see high goals achieved on the hardwood.
And Florida won its two national titles with the same exact team - so its a different situation.
Sorry, I remember 4 years ago I was happy that we made a freaking tournament. Let alone Conference Titles under Pearl. I do have expectations, I'm just saying I'm not going to bash my own team when they arn't beating Kansas in the Phog, or going to the final four yearly.
You have no right saying Florida doesn't diserve it's Championships, or that it was a fluke because it was the same team? The fact is they won 2 national titles. It is very hard to win 1, let alone 2. Saying it is a fluke is narrow minded, and biased. They played by the rules, did their jobs, and played amazing basketball for 2 straight years and yet you are saying it's not actual titles? I hate Florida so much, but taking away their titles because "they had the same team" or "it was lucky" is ridiculous.
Please, please, please, PLEASE show me where I said Florida's titles were flukes or they weren't deserving or they aren't actual titles.
My point was that doesn't make them an elite (top 10) program. They had success in a small period of time and haven't made it consistent enough - as I stated earlier... Billy Donovan used to be considered a great recruiter with tons of talent on his teams but they always choked and never lived up to their talent - unless he gets lucky and gets a team together with that kind of talent and chemistry like the title team - he'll go back to that level.
And I understand we were utter crap before he got here - but doesn't mean we should settle for less if we have a decent coach but know we could do better with a change. Many schools do well in both football and basketball.