O'Reilly upsets Joy Behar and Whoopi

If he along with everyone else listed that was looking at the intell was wrong, they had to lie. But that doesn't sound as good politically.

Every country in the world had intel on Saddam having WMDs. When the US government was asked for advice they told the government they needed to do something about the WMDs. The government had their own agenda but used the military reason.

Did Bush Lie then? not really but he wasn't exactly forthcoming with what his agenda was either.
 
Well. The fact of the matter is that we didn't find any WMDs in Iraq, even though our government told us Hussein had such capability. During this period we went to war and civilians were injured, as they are in every war. This proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Christians are hypocrites and just as dangerous if not moreso than Islamic terrorists.

How are you fools struggling to follow this infallible logic?
 
Well. The fact of the matter is that we didn't find any WMDs in Iraq, even though our government told us Hussein had such capability. During this period we went to war and civilians were injured, as they are in every war. This proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Christians are hypocrites and just as dangerous if not moreso than Islamic terrorists.

How are you fools struggling to follow this infallible logic?

I think Im gonna convert to Islam. The blanket seems to be better.
 
This proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Christians are hypocrites and just as dangerous if not moreso than Islamic terrorists.

Is this what happens when you get proven wrong? You just start blabbering mumbo jumbo that you make up out of thin air?
 
Well. The fact of the matter is that we didn't find any WMDs in Iraq, even though our government told us Hussein had such capability. During this period we went to war and civilians were injured, as they are in every war. This proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Christians are hypocrites and just as dangerous if not moreso than Islamic terrorists.

How are you fools struggling to follow this infallible logic?

I never saw where everyone involved in the decision and war were Christians.. Got a link?
 
I never saw where everyone involved in the decision and war were Christians.. Got a link?

I never said anything like that. I said a large number of christians in this country supported the Iraq war, that is it.

The rest of that garbage is an example of what happens when someone gets super defensive on the internet.
 
The reasons for the Iraq war were fabricated, 100% lies. Yet people in this country still supported the war. It really makes all of you Christians with your holier-than-thou attitudes look like giant hypocrites.

I have come to realize this is what/who you have a problem with.

Im not sure its about civilians dying in America, Iraq, or anywhere else at this point.

This summed it up pretty well.
 
I've never considered a bunch of bible thumping hillbillies dangerous, just so I'm clear. That was made up in kptvols alternate reality.
 
I've never considered a bunch of bible thumping hillbillies dangerous, just so I'm clear. That was made up in kptvols alternate reality.

I guess I misinterpreted your claim that Christians have been murdering forever in the name of god and that they support the murder of thousands of innocent civilians.

Good to know Christians are all bible-thumping hillbillies.
 
I must have missed that part where you proved something.

You know, other than you being an idiot.

So was there a connection between Iraq and Al Queda or not? If so, do you have one iota of evidence supporting your position?

You can't stop insulting me long enough to answer a simple question.
 
So was there a connection between Iraq and Al Queda or not? If so, do you have one iota of evidence supporting your position?

You can't stop insulting me long enough to answer a simple question.

I have yet to mention anything other than WMDs.
 
You mentioned it, not I. I was referring to justification for invading Iraq and Kerry's evaluation of it.

So you responded to a question of mine with something completely irrelevant? Not surprising, but it does clear some things up. Thanks.
 
Please explain in detail your problem with O'Reilly's comments.

And don't call me buddy.

I don't have any problems with O'Reillys comments. It was a "muslim attack" as much as the oklahoma city bombing was a "christian attack."

Call it what you want to call it.
 

VN Store



Back
Top