O'Reilly upsets Joy Behar and Whoopi

#178
#178
VolBurgers said:
So you responded to a question of mine with something completely irrelevant? Not surprising, but it does clear some things up. Thanks.
Click to expand...

You see it as irrelevant.

John Kerry along with the rest of congress pass votes that pertain to everyday life in America. That would make them relevant. He along with the rest of the left that voted yes looked at the same intell that Bush did. And came to the same decision.
 
#180
#180
VolBurgers said:
I don't have any problems with O'Reillys comments. It was a "muslim attack" as much as the oklahoma city bombing was a "christian attack."

Call it what you want to call it.
Click to expand...

You have an organized group of Muslims committing a terrorist act in the name of their god with a mission stated repeatedly as the destruction of America. They also publicly boasted of the act and how greatly it glorified their god.

And you have a lunatic that may or may not have been a Christian.
 
Last edited:
#183
#183
VolBurgers said:
What intell is that exactly? It seems to me a bunch of idiots took the last administration at their word, the same mistake many of you seem to have made.
Click to expand...

So you think the left would take the chance on losing their seats without seeing any intell that would tell them to vote yes?

Kinda out there considering todays politics where you run from/separate from the unpopular.

As to the bold, let me guess, you had it all figured out before it happened.
 
#188
#188
You think everyone in this country believed every word that came out of war mongering dick cheneys mouth? :eek:k:
 
#189
#189
VolBurgers said:
That would be relevant if the religious right didn't support the war long after the information was known to be BS.
Click to expand...

I support the troops, and leaving the situation in the best shape possible no matter how we got there.

You seem to have a soft spot for the Iraqi civilians, you should be overjoyed that we went the extra mile to leave under the best possible terms we could. Right or Wrong.
 
#190
#190
VolBurgers said:
You think everyone in this country supported a war based on zero facts? :eek:k:
Click to expand...

More than you give credit to. To act like your average citizen would know is ridiculous. One thing we did know. Hussein didn't want to comply with the UN.

Many on the left staked their career on it. Stupid or not most understand what it takes to survive in politics, you don't make decisions on your career from what your adversary tells you is true.
 
#191
#191
VolBurgers said:
I don't have any problems with O'Reillys comments. It was a "muslim attack" as much as the oklahoma city bombing was a "christian attack."

Call it what you want to call it.
Click to expand...

You could if you were ignorant in the differences in the 2.

The Muslim can take you to there scripture or guidance and justify 9/11 and such acts.

The Christian could not do the same.
 
Last edited:
#194
#194
kptvol said:
A murderous tyrant got overthrown. Terrible.
Click to expand...

So terrible that George Bush and Co, had to spread misinformation and give BS reasons for going to war with Iraq.

Why don't we go start wars with everyone in the world we don't like. YAY that will be FUN.

HERE WE COME KIM JONG
 
#195
#195
BeecherVol said:
The good that comes from that is irrelevant to many.

Funny, those that slam the military for killing civilians (on purpose or not) fail to mention how many he killed.
Click to expand...
What is funny is how you justify the deaths of thousands of Americans in Iraq.

How many Americans were dying in Iraq before?

Also, two wrongs don't make a right, and two lies don't make a truth.
 
#196
#196
VolBurgers said:
What is funny is how you justify the deaths of thousands of Americans in Iraq.

How many Americans were dying in Iraq before?

Also, two wrongs don't make a right, and two lies don't make a truth.
Click to expand...

Apparently thousands of civilians getting killed is a pretty horrendous thing. Saddam was murdering a hell of a lot more than that. But I guess there was no reason to intervene and if you were glad that we were intervening it means that you were supporting the murder of innocent citizens.
 
#198
#198
VolBurgers said:
What is funny is how you justify the deaths of thousands of Americans in Iraq.

How many Americans were dying in Iraq before?

Also, two wrongs don't make a right, and two lies don't make a truth.
Click to expand...

I tip my hat to anyone that signs up to serve our military, fully understanding that they may be killed in a training exercise and not ever see a battle field. I have 3 family members that have been to Iraq and Afgstan. 2 of the 3 joined after both wars where underway. They fully understood the situation.
 
#199
#199
VolBurgers said:
There were reasons, but they were all made up out of thin air.

Besides that, no there was no reason.
Click to expand...

Then there's no reason to ***** about civilians getting killed to overthrow a guy that was going to do one thousand fold that damage.
 
#200
#200
kptvol said:
Apparently thousands of civilians getting killed is a pretty horrendous thing. Saddam was murdering a hell of a lot more than that. But I guess there was no reason to intervene and if you were glad that we were intervening it means that you were supporting the murder of innocent citizens.
Click to expand...

Im sure Hitler was not involved in killing 6 mil. Jews either.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top