VolBurgers
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2010
- Messages
- 1,095
- Likes
- 0
What does that mean? Show me the evidence. I really want to be proven wrong here.
I already know John Kerry is an idiot, you are showing me nothing.Another quote.
More recently, Kerry said on October 9, 2002; "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.
Evidently it was strong enough to convince John Kerry to say he'd have also invaded Iraq.
What does that mean? Show me the evidence. I really want to be proven wrong here.
I dont care two shts what John Kerry said. Show me the evidence linking Iraq to Al Queda.
So you are provided proof and you back off to another argument?
I dont care two shts what John Kerry said. Show me the evidence linking Iraq to Al Queda.
Right. I can't show you evidence to prove they were there. Thus, they could not possibly have been there. More likely it was a huge conspiracy that Kerry was also in on.
Wow, the bush administration lied and some dolty (d) bought it hook, line, and sinker? Color me shocked.The point is you are claiming that Bush lied to start a war. Just showing you who he was in with in selling this lie. Was all the intell. 100% correct. No, when is it ever. But it was enough to sell his strongest adversaries, which makes it hard to believe the Michael Moore intell. passed on later.
I wasn't backing off to another argument. You're having a hard time following along.
I've been wanting evidence that supports the idea that Iraq was harboring terrorists, nothing else. I literally could not care less about anything John Kerry has ever said.
The consensus of intelligence experts has been that these contacts never led to an operational relationship, and that consensus is backed up by reports from the independent 9/11 Commission and by declassified Defense Department reports[3] as well as by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, whose 2006 report of Phase II of its investigation into prewar intelligence reports concluded that there was no evidence of ties between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda. Critics of the Bush Administration have said Bush was intentionally building a case for war with Iraq without regard to factual evidence. On April 29, 2007, former Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet said on 60 Minutes, "We could never verify that there was any Iraqi authority, direction and control, complicity with al-Qaeda for 9/11 or any operational act against America, period."[5]
Bush did not lie, it was one of many reasons we went to war with Iraq. He choose the one to sell to the public poorly and got burned by the French in doing so.