jakez4ut
Patience... It's what's for dinner
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2005
- Messages
- 71,427
- Likes
- 128,612
If you read his post he clearly states that one slap was not sufficient. Evidently you have a reading disability.
I can reason that a human being making millions of dollars a year that cannot stay away from trouble even after he has been notified that his ability to make these millions will be ended is dumber than a dog. My reading is fine, yours is on a plane with P-man.
Is this easier for you? "Roof woof, woof, bark"
Yawn. Was Pac-Man present at the time of the crime? I could read the part that said he wasn't. Everything else was inconsequential.
This is all really inconsequential Vercingtorix. Just have Kpt explain it to you.
It probably actually is inconsequential, because there's no way Goodell was going to reduce Jones's suspension anyway. It's still pretty astonishing that the man would plead to Goodell one week that he was really committed to changing his life, and then get involved in a fracas at a strip club the very next week. Can't this guy just hire some strippers to come entertain him and his friends at his house?
It probably actually is inconsequential, because there's no way Goodell was going to reduce Jones's suspension anyway. It's still pretty astonishing that the man would plead to Goodell one week that he was really committed to changing his life, and then get involved in a fracas at a strip club the very next week. Can't this guy just hire some strippers to come entertain him and his friends at his house?
We'll see how inconsequential it is when Goodell calls Pacman back to his office to tell him that he's exhausted his "last chance" and he is permanently banned from the NFL.
That will simply not happen. Pacman absolutely had no involvement in this incident. The police were just seeking Adam for questioning regarding his entourage's whereabouts.
That will simply not happen. Pacman absolutely had no involvement in this incident. The police were just seeking Adam for questioning regarding his entourage's whereabouts.
Witnesses say Jones was in the strip club and a participant in the argument that preceded the shooting. Witnesses said Jones himself threatened to go get a gun. Witnesses said that the guys were involved in the shooting were all members of Jones's entourage.
While it doesn't sound as if the cops believe Jones himself was around for the actual shooting, the phrase "absolutely no involvement in this incident" must mean something different to you than it does to me.
The witnesses are 100% incorrect. In fact, it's been said he wasn't even at the club after 4:00 a.m. The police discredited most of their claims according to his attorney.
Well then you have certainly proven you have the same mental processes as pac-man. So let me try to explain something to you. Roger Goodell is not a judge and does not care if he has been convicted of anything. He is more like a boss in a really lucrative company. He does not care if the law has been broken, he cares how his employees behave. Along with this, he has the power to punish his employees whether they have been convicted of anything or not. It seems you really have Pac's grasp on how things work.
You might use the above explanation before using "inconsequential".
The witnesses are 100% incorrect. In fact, it's been said he wasn't even at the club after 4:00 a.m. The police discredited most of their claims according to his attorney.
This is just really funny to me for some reason. Like you thought his attorney is going to come out and say how involved he was in this matter.
Also, why did the police only discredit most of their claims? A few words earlier you say the witnesses are 100% incorrect.
Could you contradict yourself a few more times please? Roger Goodell is concerned with how his employees behave? Seeing as how Pac-Man's behavior that night is unrelated to this incident, the best word to describe it is inconsequential.
It's been said by whom? Oh, his attorney. Now that makes it a rock solid "he had absolutely no involvement."