Paris Terror Attack Underway

Well, look at the date on the article. I wonder if the sentiment still applies this afternoon. Only among the far left lunatics I am sure.

It doesn't matter the date, the point is that a so-called first world country would actually lock someone up for what they say...
 
This is the exact response the people behind these terror attacks are wanting.

I really hink that you could sell the idea to Joe Sixpack that looks at FOXNews or hell... even CNBC or CBSocialist that a neutron bomb is a "clean" way of riding us of terrorists.

Meanwhile, the real sinister criminals that got us involved in the Middle East in the first place get off noose.

It is sad. Thinking that dropping WMDs onto populated locations throughout the middle east will solve the problem of radical islam is so blatantly stupid that there could only be one real explanation- they don't actually care about whether such tactics will help stop radical islam. They just want to kill as many muslims and watch as many cities burn as possible for their own personal sense of revenge. We drop a WMD on a city and ISIS isn't lamenting their upcoming defeat or the loss of a couple hundred grunts, they're celebrating the absolute best example of western evil we could possibly give them, and their numbers will grow exponentially. Congratulations, we murdered a city of 95%+ innocents and strengthened ISIS.

I know there are plenty of reasonable posters here who understand this, but there are also an alarming number who don't. It makes you thankful they aren't in charge, or we would have started WWIII a long time ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
This is scary talk. Now you have introduced a sanitized method of taking human life while preserving infrastructure. That is just perfect for most 'Muricans to accept.

Seriously, if you introduce this idea to the general public, they would be all over it and there would be a mob push for us to engage in Muslim/Arab genocide.

Theoretical as far as I know. The idea is to destroy neturons found in organic material but not in things like buildings. The idea has been around for decades..I have no idea if it exists..but if it does..well..Sh@t just got real.
 
It is sad. Thinking that dropping WMDs onto populated locations throughout the middle east will solve the problem of radical islam is so blatantly stupid that there could only be one real explanation- they don't actually care about whether such tactics will help stop radical islam. They just want to kill as many muslims and watch as many cities burn as possible for their own personal sense of revenge. We drop a WMD on a city and ISIS isn't lamenting their upcoming defeat or the loss of a couple hundred grunts, they're celebrating the absolute best example of western evil we could possibly give them, and their numbers will grow exponentially. Congratulations, we murdered a city of 95%+ innocents and strengthened ISIS.

I know there are plenty of reasonable posters here who understand this, but there are also an alarming number who don't. It makes you thankful they aren't in charge, or we would have started WWIII a long time ago.
Collateral damage.
 
Collateral damage.

Collateral damage could be acceptable if the mission is accomplished. Of course, it won't accomplish the mission of stopping radical Islam. So you're essentially saying, inflict death and destruction on millions of people(while simultaneously strengthening our enemy-great strategy) for the sake of satisfying your blood lust. Are you a Christian?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
It is sad. Thinking that dropping WMDs onto populated locations throughout the middle east will solve the problem of radical islam is so blatantly stupid that there could only be one real explanation- they don't actually care about whether such tactics will help stop radical islam. They just want to kill as many muslims and watch as many cities burn as possible for their own personal sense of revenge. We drop a WMD on a city and ISIS isn't lamenting their upcoming defeat or the loss of a couple hundred grunts, they're celebrating the absolute best example of western evil we could possibly give them, and their numbers will grow exponentially. Congratulations, we murdered a city of 95%+ innocents and strengthened ISIS.

I know there are plenty of reasonable posters here who understand this, but there are also an alarming number who don't. It makes you thankful they aren't in charge, or we would have started WWIII a long time ago.

Enlighten us with your knowledge on how to fix the problem!!


And...yes..some of us are in charge. :the_finger:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Collateral damage could be acceptable if the mission is accomplished. Of course, it won't accomplish the mission of stopping radical Islam. So you're essentially saying, inflict death and destruction on millions of people(while simultaneously strengthening our enemy-great strategy) for the sake of satisfying your blood lust. Are you a Christian?
Whatever it takes to rid the world of rats. As to the last question, nunya.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I'm not in favor of dropping nukes. But we should bring back carpet bombing and the use of napalm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Enlighten us with your knowledge on how to fix the problem!!

Again, you have not said how WMDs will stop the ideal of radical Islam. You say you have a solution, but your solution fails to accomplish the goal. Not only does it fail to accomplish the goal(stopping radical islam), it strengthens their propaganda and recruiting efforts. While I may not have a great solution, your solution actively strengthens the enemy. You aren't very good at tactics.

So, one can only assume that your desire for the use of WMDs is emotionally driven rather than actually tactically sound. You're an emotional person who shouldn't be making those types of decisions.

And...yes..some of us are in charge. :the_finger:

You don't have any decision making power, so please, don't pretend to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

VN Store



Back
Top