Rasputin_Vol
"Slava Ukraina"
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 72,056
- Likes
- 39,842
@MSNBC: French Interior Minister: We will start the "dissolution of mosques where hate is preached." https://t.co/BZwXLnBnp3 https://t.co/sZ7JIvVPp9
That's a bold strategy
This is the exact response the people behind these terror attacks are wanting.
I really hink that you could sell the idea to Joe Sixpack that looks at FOXNews or hell... even CNBC or CBSocialist that a neutron bomb is a "clean" way of riding us of terrorists.
Meanwhile, the real sinister criminals that got us involved in the Middle East in the first place get off noose.
This is scary talk. Now you have introduced a sanitized method of taking human life while preserving infrastructure. That is just perfect for most 'Muricans to accept.
Seriously, if you introduce this idea to the general public, they would be all over it and there would be a mob push for us to engage in Muslim/Arab genocide.
Collateral damage.It is sad. Thinking that dropping WMDs onto populated locations throughout the middle east will solve the problem of radical islam is so blatantly stupid that there could only be one real explanation- they don't actually care about whether such tactics will help stop radical islam. They just want to kill as many muslims and watch as many cities burn as possible for their own personal sense of revenge. We drop a WMD on a city and ISIS isn't lamenting their upcoming defeat or the loss of a couple hundred grunts, they're celebrating the absolute best example of western evil we could possibly give them, and their numbers will grow exponentially. Congratulations, we murdered a city of 95%+ innocents and strengthened ISIS.
I know there are plenty of reasonable posters here who understand this, but there are also an alarming number who don't. It makes you thankful they aren't in charge, or we would have started WWIII a long time ago.
@MSNBC: French Interior Minister: We will start the "dissolution of mosques where hate is preached." https://t.co/BZwXLnBnp3 https://t.co/sZ7JIvVPp9
That's a bold strategy
Collateral damage.
It is sad. Thinking that dropping WMDs onto populated locations throughout the middle east will solve the problem of radical islam is so blatantly stupid that there could only be one real explanation- they don't actually care about whether such tactics will help stop radical islam. They just want to kill as many muslims and watch as many cities burn as possible for their own personal sense of revenge. We drop a WMD on a city and ISIS isn't lamenting their upcoming defeat or the loss of a couple hundred grunts, they're celebrating the absolute best example of western evil we could possibly give them, and their numbers will grow exponentially. Congratulations, we murdered a city of 95%+ innocents and strengthened ISIS.
I know there are plenty of reasonable posters here who understand this, but there are also an alarming number who don't. It makes you thankful they aren't in charge, or we would have started WWIII a long time ago.
Whatever it takes to rid the world of rats. As to the last question, nunya.Collateral damage could be acceptable if the mission is accomplished. Of course, it won't accomplish the mission of stopping radical Islam. So you're essentially saying, inflict death and destruction on millions of people(while simultaneously strengthening our enemy-great strategy) for the sake of satisfying your blood lust. Are you a Christian?
@MSNBC: French Interior Minister: We will start the "dissolution of mosques where hate is preached." https://t.co/BZwXLnBnp3 https://t.co/sZ7JIvVPp9
That's a bold strategy
Enlighten us with your knowledge on how to fix the problem!!
And...yes..some of us are in charge. :the_finger: