RockyTop85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2011
- Messages
- 13,181
- Likes
- 7,131
People exercising their right to vote cannot affect Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. So, I guess that leaves open for interpretation what “whirlwind” was release and what “price” they were to pay and what might “hit” them.Where's the picture or the video of him brandishing a gun when he said that? Nowhere, because he was talking about women exersizing free speech and their right to vote. Duh.
LMAO at what you’re pushing as evidence. What is affirmed is that this guy used to be a Green Party progressive. What is able to be inferred is at some point he really went off the reservation from reality. Your need to attach his crazy ass to a political reservation once he departed sanity is irrelevant “counselor”The point could not be made if you were able to be convinced by mere overwhelming evidence.
Two days after former Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin was found guilty of killing George Floyd, DePape wrote that the trial was "a modern lynching," falsely indicating that Floyd died of a drug overdose.
Far left progressive who thought Chauvin was a victim of the system. Damn that’s a new one.
This guy could have fit right in as a poster here.
LMAO at what you’re pushing as evidence. What is affirmed is that this guy used to be a Green Party progressive. What is able to be inferred is at some point he really went off the reservation from reality. Your need to attach his crazy ass to a political reservation once he departed sanity is irrelevant “counselor”
You left out how the media also crucified Chauvin
So, when I was looking through the Nicholas Roske discussions yesterday, I saw him openly acknowledge that left rhetoric and Chuck Schumer specifically were responsible for that kid’s actions. I’m sure I could quickly find it again, if you like. He wasn’t particularly outraged, but has anybody done even that in this thread?
It’s just as obvious, and yet this thread spent 3 days demanding that octogenarian butt sex for hire to be disproven (despite the discovery of the broken window on day 1) and now we’re onto “well just because he was steeped in hateful right wing rhetoric doesn’t mean that that’s why he targeted the democratic speaker.” And that’s just the ones who have let the butt sex theory go.
Hey I’m just taking the dude at his word from the past. I don’t actually need to stretch Armstrong it to show he has been a progressive Green Party member in the past.Other posts from the last few weeks featured videos accusing LGBTQ people of "grooming" children, and declared that "any journalist saying" there is no evidence of election fraud "should be dragged straight out into the street and shot."
Sounds like standard far left progressive content, to me.
So you refuse to answer my question directed to you. I'm not going to engage in 20 questions with you but I'll gladly engage in a back and forth conversation. In order to do that you'll have to give me answers to my questions directed to you“The People who disagree with me actually are evil” is a bold strategy for someone who says the right doesn’t take it that far.
With rising book bans, librarians have come under attack as 'groomers' and 'pedophiles'
People exercising their right to vote cannot affect Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. So, I guess that leaves open for interpretation what “whirlwind” was release and what “price” they were to pay and what might “hit” them.
Especially early in a Presidential term to select the replacement of the slain justice. Calculated to sway the courts.People exercising their right to vote cannot affect Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. So, I guess that leaves open for interpretation what “whirlwind” was release and what “price” they were to pay and what might “hit” them.
So, to recap, this “far left progressive’s” recent social media posts are essentially indistinguishable from the posts of Trumpkins in good standing on this forum, but that’s definitely not evidence that right wing rhetoric had anything to do with him targeting the democrat speaker of the house. The fact that said speaker is a frequent subject of said right wing rhetoric is pure coincidence and we should not make any inferences because this guy who sounds just like you was clearly a ****ing nutcase based on his political views.Hey I’m just taking the dude at his word from the past. I don’t actually need to stretch Armstrong it to show he has been a progressive Green Party member in the past.
Have you scheduled your gender reassignment procedure yet you Biden Democrat you?
I did state yesterday I believe that he was a disenfranchised progressive Democrat. That is clearly not true. He is a disenfranchised progressive Green Party person from his own affirmations
I honestly don’t understand why you’re so invested in attaching this nut job to anything other than the looney farm unless it’s just more raging TDS that resulted in your political party change. He’s crazy and that condition knows no party boundary. Additionally trying to take a singular crazy nutjob and attempting to attach to a political party for the purpose of implying a broader applicability and sell guilt by association is just some weak ass trolling. But oh well you do youSo, to recap, this “far left progressive’s” recent social media posts are essentially indistinguishable from the posts of Trumpkins in good standing on this forum, but that’s definitely not evidence that right wing rhetoric had anything to do with him targeting the democrat speaker of the house. The fact that said speaker is a frequent subject of said right wing rhetoric is pure coincidence and we should not make any inferences because this guy who sounds just like you was clearly a ****ing nutcase based on his political views.
Honestly, I think you have a winner this time.
This one seems way more plausible than the weekend theory that Paul Pelosi most likely called the police about an intruder and ended up on the hospital with a fractured skull because of clandestine butt sex because, despite the broken glass door to his house, there’s this random neighborhood in San Francisco that has tight security.
Side note: not sure if karma glitch or some kind of moderator prank, but any time I try to copy and paste from within the site, “I don’t have expertise in that area” pops up instead of what was on my clipboard. The clipboard works in all my phones’ other applications so I’m assuming it’s a prank and I have to say: well played. That’s ****ing hilarious.
Could just be that she's a bad person and crazy Green Party guy views it as much. No rhetoric by the left or right. Maybe he had Google and Visa stock and wanted some that insider trading info.So, to recap, this “far left progressive’s” recent social media posts are essentially indistinguishable from the posts of Trumpkins in good standing on this forum, but that’s definitely not evidence that right wing rhetoric had anything to do with him targeting the democrat speaker of the house. The fact that said speaker is a frequent subject of said right wing rhetoric is pure coincidence and we should not make any inferences because this guy who sounds just like you was clearly a ****ing nutcase based on his political views.
Honestly, I think you have a winner this time.
This one seems way more plausible than the weekend theory that Paul Pelosi most likely called the police about an intruder and ended up on the hospital with a fractured skull because of clandestine butt sex because, despite the broken glass door to his house, there’s this random neighborhood in San Francisco that has tight security.
Side note: not sure if karma glitch or some kind of moderator prank, but any time I try to copy and paste from within the site, “I don’t have expertise in that area” pops up instead of what was on my clipboard. The clipboard works in all my phones’ other applications so I’m assuming it’s a prank and I have to say: well played. That’s ****ing hilarious.