NorthDallas40
Displaced Hillbilly
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2014
- Messages
- 57,104
- Likes
- 83,157
I’m really enjoying your attempt to attach rational thinking to a clearly irrational crazy nut. So you were also irrational and crazy when you voted for Biden? I can agree to thatOh, you thought that was all.
“Other posts included transphobic images”
I guess we can mostly skip that as there is room for subjective disagreement over what “transphobic” means, but this certainly seems like it would be inconsistent with far left progressivism.
So how about this, instead:
“…and linked to websites claiming Covid vaccines were deadly. "The death rates being promoted are what ever 'THEY' want to be promoted as the death rate," one post read.”
Do you recall far left progressives being against vaccines and claiming that the death rates for Covid were misrepresented by a nebulous “they” or was that more of a Trumpkin behavior?
Jan 6......He's a nutjob, I'm sure.
But that doesn't distract from the fact that he was mimicking the 1/6 nutjobs.
All of whom feel emboldened to resort to violence in the name of some amorphous patriotic theme. Let's face it, there's a ton of disaffected people out there, with no sense of purpose or self worth. Left behind. Looking for their lives to meaningful.
And they get told a bunch of lies and are exhorted to do terrible things so they, too, can be in the history books. That's the shame of it. The manipulation of the weak and easily influenced by people who know better.
I'm not here to play 20 questions with you on Trump. The first example was a poor one and I pointed that out. As for Trump, is he really a conservative? I would say not. My original comment was about conservatives/liberals.
In honor of you, I will address your No. 2.
In this example Trump is taking the term "Never Trumpers" quite personally and I think we can all see why. The term itself is very personal so yeah, he lashed back. I think his comment was genuine and truthful. I appreciate my pols being genuine and not pols. I agree that's not for everyone but it's his unfiltered comments that got him elected in the first place
Don't create strawmen. Use my exact words.
TLDR your BSWhere did you get the idea that educated people are more easily indoctrinated than uneducated people? First of all, what's taught in universities is examined for accuracy, by all sorts of people who just love to score points by disproving false beliefs. Those folks look at everything that's taught, inside out and six ways from Sunday. They are not a bunch of blow-hard, con artists like you might encounter in today's media. The point is that educated people have a background of thoroughly tested information to use as context in their own truth testing. They are far more resistant to manipulation, because they know how to think critically. It's the less educated folks who are more subject to "brainwashing." Of course, many individuals specialize their field of study. For example, how does studying dentistry or engineering develop an informational background to use as a context for truth testing political issues? It doesn't. Unfortunately, many journalists do not get much of that sort of background, either. There's a lot of those folks who not not know much at all about the subjects of the stories they cover.
I’m really enjoying your attempt to attach rational thinking to a clearly irrational crazy nut. So you were also irrational and crazy when you voted for Biden? I can agree to that
So is this directive optional, now? Everybody ehas to use your exact words and then… what? Not take them literally?
Because your actual words were: “the left takes it a step further. They call you a bad person, example: deplorable. The right doesn't take it that far.”
So are you saying not to use your exact words or are you saying Trump isn’t “the right?”
No. 3:
So after the defense lawyer posts this guys own positive affirmations is this an argument you’d make to a jury “counselor”? I’d love to be on that jury as I horse laughed you out of the court house. And I’m sure BB is happy to hand off the inference baton to you he was floundering badly.“DePape also posted links to YouTube videos with titles like "Democrat FARCE Commission to Investigate January 6th Capitol Riot COLLAPSES in Congress!!!"”
A far left progressive who thinks the January 6 Commission is a farce? Does that seem right to you or are you saying that 3/4 of this forum are also batshit crazy?
He did include mentioning the Democratic Party while explaining his motive. It isn't just Pelosi that he thinks lies. It's Democrats. He wanted to attack Pelosi, because of her leadership position within the Democratic Party. You are being deliberately obtuse.I am too. He made ZERO affirmative statements as to his own party affiliation in those statements. But we know he really doesn’t like Nancy and think she’s a liar
He mentioned Nancy as the “leader of the pack” and again you’re selling whatever that pack is. What is affirmed is he thinks Nancy is a liar. I actually agree with him on that assertion!He did include mentioning the Democratic Party while explaining his motive. It isn't just Pelosi that he thinks lies. It's Democrats. He wanted to attack Pelosi, because of her leadership position within the Democratic Party. You are being deliberately obtuse.
The unhinged right at it again....wait
Data show there have been 22 times more attacks on pro-lifers than pro-choice groups since Supreme Court leak
Like I have told you before, I can post tons of videos of Dem leaders calling for violence against those who disagree with them. You know it as well. But you only choose to be outraged when it's not your side. It's why you are a fraud.I must have missed where Dem leadership or Biden called for violence against GOPers over abortion post Doe decision.
"Data" published by Fox News in strategic timing with the mid-term elections, because this is how Fox News conducts business when they believe they have manufactured information that will further energize the Republican base to get out and vote.The unhinged right at it again....wait
Data show there have been 22 times more attacks on pro-lifers than pro-choice groups since Supreme Court leak
Really what I am doing is mocking all the pearl clutching going on by the left posters about hateful rhetoric from the right. I have seen tons of inflammatory rhetoric from the left leadership that has led to violence. And all of you were silent, excused it as something different then what it was, or ignored it. The lack of self awareness is astounding."Data" published by Fox News in strategic timing with the mid-term elections, because this is how Fox News conducts business when they believe they have manufactured information that will further energize the Republican base to get out and vote.
Not saying it couldn't be accurate - it makes sense that abortion rights advocates would be more angry and prone to violence, than pro-life advocates would be. Pro-life advocates got what they wanted. It's over.
Having said that, you are usually better than posting Fox News propaganda like that... and that's what it is. You should always be suspicious of so-called data research which is published exactly one week before a mid-term election. There are no coincidences of timing. You appear gullible for posting that crap.
BowlBrother85 said:
I never promoted it... or said the content of it was authentic. Now, I'm tired of this. Go play gotcha games with someone else.
BowlBrother85 said:
The Steele dossier has not been discredited at all... to the contrary, 70% of it has been confirmed as accurate. Comey said no such thing in his testimony about the dossier. As for my IQ? I'm not sure. However, I am a proud graduate of the University of Tennessee (class of 1996) and also a VERY STABLE GENIUS.
Hog88 said:
I got more.
BowlBrother85 said:
Fine. Get a life while you are at it.
ouch.
Your posting that from Fox News was astounding.Really what I am doing is mocking all the pearl clutching going on by the left posters about hateful rhetoric from the right. I have seen tons of inflammatory rhetoric from the left leadership that has led to violence. And all of you were silent, excused it as something different then what it was, or ignored it. The lack of self awareness is astounding.
The right arent the only people with Pelosi issues.That is not true.
Under 15 a of the affidavit, it is said that DePape broke into the home for the purpose of taking Nancy Pelosi hostage and breaking her kneecaps. There was also a stated reason given. It was that Nancy Pelosi was the leader of the pack of lies told by the Democratic Party.
No no no. It HAS to be a two party dodge ball situation louderThe right arent the only people with Pelosi issues.
Plenty on the left want her gone. She was supposed to retire/be done to make room for the squad. But that hasnt happened. A lot of progressives believe she is responsible for the Democratic party from being more progressive as they have promised. But she has a stranglehold on her district and the leadership of the party so real change wont happen under her.
That's not a unique posistion for Rs. Heck, even though yall wont admit it, most of the leftists on this board have admitted to wanting her gone.Wrong.
DePape provided the police with a political motivation for his violent actions. It's just not what you want to hear. DePape targeted Nancy Pelosi due to her leadership standing in the Democratic Party, and his belief that Democrats are liars.
I'm sorry that reading comprehension is such a challenge for you.