Paul Pelosi attacked in home invasion

I wasn't talking about you, personally. I said that they want to defend themselves against accusations of being involved in a coverup, that are being made by people such as yourself, who don't have all of the facts, and are making claims based out of ignorance, such as this ....



The home does have bulletproof glass.


So again, why go and do safe interviews so we can know all the facts? What’s to hide with Wolf Blitzer. Go on record and if a question is asked it should be addressed.
 
So again, why go and do safe interviews so we can know all the facts? What’s to hide with Wolf Blitzer. Go on record and if a question is asked it should be addressed.
Why does it matter so much as to where they go? What would be better? Let me guess ... Fox News ? LOL.
 
There will be some questions that they can't answer, of course .... but where should they go? Name a place. What would have been better?


And that’s why you don’t interview while an on going investigation is happening. Even in a safe space
 
And that’s why you don’t interview while an on going investigation is happening. Even in a safe space
... and then you would be accusing them of trying to conceal something from the public. They can't satisfy people, such as yourself, who want to believe that something nefarious is taking place behind the scenes, with a cover up at hand. You will always have something to be suspicious of ... If surveillance video is released, which confirms the information in the affidavit, then it will be because the video was either doctored or it's a staged recreation. That's just how it is with the right.
 
... and then you would be accusing them of trying to conceal something from the public. They can't satisfy people, such as yourself, who want to believe that something nefarious is taking place behind the scenes, with a cover up at hand. You will always have something to be suspicious of ... If surveillance video is released, which confirms the information in the affidavit, then it will be because the video was either doctored or it's a staged recreation. That's just how it is with the right.
Ongoing investigation is a safe word
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
I asked you a specific question relevant to the topic about threatening speech.

You're just mad because like every leftist, you've got nothing but politics. Literally. Likely saddled with debt, solidly alone and so attached to political personalities that don't care about you and never will (actually, it's more likely that they hate you and are happy to sacrifice your well-being for their gain), a slave to the "system" you like to bitch about.... if you're an old man that's still proud of that, I feel less irritated by your "peskiness" and more sad for the state you wallow in.

Well, I'm a pretty good authority on me, and you're not, If you like fabricating false insults, you can go ahead and lie yourself silly, but might be better if you poured yourself that glass. Gotta hop.
 
Last edited:
... and then you would be accusing them of trying to conceal something from the public. They can't satisfy people, such as yourself, who want to believe that something nefarious is taking place behind the scenes, with a cover up at hand. You will always have something to be suspicious of ... If surveillance video is released, which confirms the information in the affidavit, then it will be because the video was either doctored or it's a staged recreation. That's just how it is with the right.

That is rich as hell.
 
Well, I'm a pretty good authority on me, and you're not, If you like fabricating false insults, you can go ahead and lie yourself silly, but might be better if you poured yourself that glass. Gotta hop.
Must be hitting close to home.

Keep living with your head in the toilet. Usually old geezers are a little wiser than that.
 
Once again, name one specific place that would have been better to go for an interview than CNN. Don't just say "Anywhere."

If this bothers you so much, where should the DA have gone? Be specific.

Briefing, open questions to the press.

Cuts through the optics of bias and safe places.
 
I don’t think there are too many who actually believe the FBI completely fabricated dude’s confession whole cloth when they still have to provide discovery and get a conviction/plea.

Most of it is people who jumped in with both feet and are now too embarrassed to back out gracefully and/or can’t back down without betraying team red. So you get the 🙈🙉 routine where they just repeat talking points that already got obliterated as if they’re still valid. (“Who opened the door?”)

The funny thing is that all the conspiracy theories have kept it at the top of the news cycle, which seems to inflame. But it’s probably better for team red that it stay there, at this point.
 
There will be some questions that they can't answer, of course .... but where should they go? Name a place. What would have been better?
We don’t know what went down at the Pelosi house, but surely….. even you….. admit there’s some questionable optics regarding what really happened.
 
Once again, name one specific place that would have been better to go for an interview than CNN. Don't just say "Anywhere."

If this bothers you so much, where should the DA have gone? Be specific.
I can do better than name one. Any local radio station in the country would have been better. Most Junior High Schools. Virtually all watering holes and Greyhound bus stations.

In fact, the average outhouse would be better than CNN.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
We don’t know what went down at the Pelosi house, but surely….. even you….. admit there’s some questionable optics regarding what really happened.
Somehow it’s Trumps fault that a gay nudist escort got into a fight with the husband of an alcoholic congresswoman. At their house in the low crime hamlet of San Francisco.
 

VN Store



Back
Top