Paul Pelosi attacked in home invasion

I don’t feel any real compulsion to pick.

Everything I’ve seen says Pelosi called police. The dispatch radio traffic recording that was available before I even knew about this story seemed pretty clear that Pelosi was the caller. In his confession, DePape said Pelosi called the police. In his interviews, Pelosi said he called the police. I don’t know anybody else who thought DePape called police. And apparently, on Friday night, SFPD Chief held a presser and said Pelosi called. This press conference was reported by SF Chronicle in an article that was last updated October 29:
Paul Pelosi attack: Police say suspect sought out Pelosi household

“In a Friday evening news conference, San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott described what happened after authorities received a 911 call at 2:28 a.m. The call came from Paul Pelosi, who, according to the recorded call, “stated that there’s a male in the home and that he’s going to wait for his wife.””

I didn’t see a retraction about prior versions of the story saying DePape had called police, which the SF Chronicle should have included if they had misreported the story previously.

🤷🏻‍♂️

It seems pretty clear that Pelosi called and, if at some point anybody said DePape called, I’d say that’s almost certainly inaccurate.
All indications are that PP initiated the call. Perhaps DD did take part in the call. My point here is to show where the media has given us conflicting information. In this instance I showed you the exact line that was "conflicting" and you continue to ignore it. That line identified DD as the one who was on the phone line with 911. It appears to be inaccurate reporting by someone in the Press
 
All indications are that PP initiated the call. Perhaps DD did take part in the call. My point here is to show where the media has given us conflicting information. In this instance I showed you the exact line that was "conflicting" and you continue to ignore it. That line identified DD as the one who was on the phone line with 911. It appears to be inaccurate reporting by someone in the Press
SF chronicle hasn't corrected that "mistake"either. We won't know more till after the 8th....this is a desperate attempt by Dems to attach MAGA and GOP to violence
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
We don’t know what went down at the Pelosi house, but surely….. even you….. admit there’s some questionable optics regarding what really happened.
We don't know every detail ... but we have an affidavit in which David DePape provides police investigators with a confession to breaking into the Pelosi home with the intention of taking Nancy hostage and breaking her kneecaps. It is not clear what DePape had to gain by fabricating such a story, which will likely lead to him spending the rest of his life in jail.

None of the theories from the right account for DePape's statements to the police - or for why he would lie - if he was lying.
 
We don't know every detail ... but we have an affidavit in which David DePape provides police investigators with a confession to breaking into the Pelosi home with the intention of taking Nancy hostage and breaking her kneecaps. It is not clear what DePape had to gain by fabricating such a story, which will likely lead to him spending the rest of his life in jail.

None of the theories from the right account for DePape's statements to the police - or for why he would lie - if he was lying.

Did he lie then or him claiming that he is innocent now a lie ? Just curious
 
All indications are that PP initiated the call. Perhaps DD did take part in the call. My point here is to show where the media has given us conflicting information. In this instance I showed you the exact line that was "conflicting" and you continue to ignore it. That line identified DD as the one who was on the phone line with 911. It appears to be inaccurate reporting by someone in the Press
Lololol. What in the actual **** are you talking about?

It’s a single sentence about another newspaper’s report that doesn’t link to an article. You can’t provide a link to any San Francisco Chronicle reporting that says DePape made the call. I read your article (which is apparently more than you did) and gave you quotes from your article that establish that Pelosi called 911. I provided you with a link to early SF Chronicle articles that said Pelosi made the call. I pointed out to you that there was a police press conference that said Pelosi made the call. I also pointed out that the police radio traffic indicated that Pelosi made the call. I noted that nobody in this thread has ever been confused about this fact unless you confused them. And I also said, twice, “if anybody reported that DePape made the call, they were wrong.”

What ****ing language are you using where that level of attention merits use of the word “ignoring?” Because it isn’t American English.

Jesus Christ. If this is supposed to be your evidence of conflicting reports… maybe the problem isn’t the media, maybe the problem is you.
 
Lololol. What in the actual **** are you talking about?

It’s a single sentence about another newspaper’s report that doesn’t link to an article. You can’t provide a link to anything that the San Francisco Chronicle reporting that DePape made the call. I read your article (which is apparently more than you did) and gave you quotes from your article that establish that Pelosi called 911. I provided you with a link to early SF Chronicle articles that said Pelosi made the call. I pointed out to you that there was a police press conference that said Pelosi made the call. I also pointed out that the police radio traffic indicated that Pelosi made the call. I noted that nobody in this thread has ever been confused about this fact unless you confused them. And I also said, twice, “if anybody reported that DePape made the call, they were wrong.”

What ****ing language are you using where that level of attention merits use of the word “ignoring?” Because it isn’t American English.

Jesus Christ. If this is supposed to be your evidence of conflicting reports… maybe the problem isn’t the media, maybe the problem is you.
You're overthinking this. I did read the article. I agree with your assessment of it. My point is that that line is not consistent. You're correct that it doesn't link to the SF Chronical. So perhaps it's the article itself that's inconsistent or maybe even incorrect. Hence my earlier comment, take your pick...which you chose to ignore. Address that statement. I'm not interested in anymore of your bloviating.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
You're overthinking this. I did read the article. I agree with your assessment of it. My point is that that line is not consistent. You're correct that it doesn't link to the SF Chronical. So perhaps it's the article itself that's inconsistent or maybe even incorrect. Hence my earlier comment, take your pick...which you chose to ignore. Address that statement. I'm not interested in anymore of your bloviating.
I actually addressed “take your pick” and said it was unnecessary because it’s an extraneous line in an article that makes clear what actually happened. I spent an entire post explaining that. Again, you don’t seem to know what the word “ignore” means. Maybe written news reports just aren’t for you.

I tell you what, why don’t you write an ideal post that doesn’t “ignore” whatever it is that I’m supposedly ignoring, and, if I think it’s correct, I’ll copy and paste it into a post of my own.

Then you can feel like you scored a point and maybe it will make you feel better about making yourself look foolish the other day. Then you can give up this embarrassing effort to put one over on me.
 
I actually addressed “take your pick” and said it was unnecessary because it’s an extraneous line in an article that makes clear what actually happened. I spent an entire post explaining that. Again, you don’t seem to know what the word “ignore” means. Maybe written news reports just aren’t for you.

I tell you what, why don’t you write an ideal post that doesn’t “ignore” whatever it is that I’m supposedly ignoring, and, if I think it’s correct, I’ll copy and paste it into a post of my own.

Then you can feel like you scored a point and maybe it will make you feel better about making yourself look foolish the other day. Then you can give up this embarrassing effort to put one over on me.
Just say you don't want to address my point and move on. I get it. Others here got my point I'm sure. You're a lost cause. Let the record show I tried to communicate with you
 
Just say you don't want to address my point and move on. I get it. Others here got my point I'm sure. You're a lost cause. Let the record show I tried to communicate with you.

@Sea Ray, I added a period to the last sentence. hope this is sufficient. Best of luck.
 
Last edited:
Didn’t know that, but thanks for making @GVF look like even more of a moron than if I had just shown him the widely circulated photograph of the Pelosis back doors opening out.

View attachment 509750
Dang sure is a lot of glass still hanging on that is directing OUT. And a heck of a hole just to get a hand through to open the door. And Paul still in the house. Heck, he had time to get to the downtown precinct and hide before the dude got done beating that door. I'm assuming the wide open doors, and the set to the right that appear to be ajar are because of the "investigators." Lefts face it, this was a game of cornhole gone bad OR an entirely staged event for mid-term elections that are not polling to go well for the Dems.

Kinda strange he didn't call the cops during all the time and commotion it took to bang out a hole that big from an unwanted intruder on the OUTSIDE, eh??
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Dang sure is a lot of glass still hanging on that is directing OUT. And a heck of a hole just to get a hand through to open the door. And Paul still in the house. Heck, he had time to get to the downtown precinct and hide before the dude got done beating that door. I'm assuming the wide open doors, and the set to the right that appear to be ajar are because of the "investigators." Lefts face it, this was a game of cornhole gone bad OR an entirely staged event for mid-term elections that are not polling to go well for the Dems.

Pelosi must have been hammered to not hear the guy busting that glass out.
 
Dude sure was compliant about Pelosi's call to the cops, huh?
Dang sure is a lot of glass still hanging on that is directing OUT. And a heck of a hole just to get a hand through to open the door. And Paul still in the house. Heck, he had time to get to the downtown precinct and hide before the dude got done beating that door. I'm assuming the wide open doors, and the set to the right that appear to be ajar are because of the "investigators." Lefts face it, this was a game of cornhole gone bad OR an entirely staged event for mid-term elections that are not polling to go well for the Dems.

I can understand how the type of person who thinks “well my exterior doors all open in so all exterior doors must open in” might believe this. But it’s not because things don’t make sense.
 
I can understand how the type of person who thinks “well my exterior doors all open in so all exterior doors must open in” might believe this. But it’s not because things don’t make sense.
And as such, since we do have doors that open out. And we have a type of protective glass that appears from this picture to have left little glass on the ground on either side. YET, we can still see in this same picture YOU provided that the majority of the glas is hanging OUTWARD. Pelosi's narrative and the observations of your picture do not mesh. This is Jessee Smollet part deaux. Nothing more than a mid-term stunt. Or unsatisfactory sex that led this "intruder" to beat the crap out of his door. He sure as heck didn't break in according to this pic.

And no, none of it makes sense. But, we all understand your the type that is deep throating this all the way to the lead weight on the fishing line. Hook be da****.
 
And as such, since we do have doors that open out. And we have a type of protective glass that appears from this picture to have left little glass on the ground on either side. YET, we can still see in this same picture YOU provided that the majority of the glas is hanging OUTWARD. Pelosi's narrative and the observations of your picture do not mesh. This is Jessee Smollet part deaux. Nothing more than a mid-term stunt. Or unsatisfactory sex that led this "intruder" to beat the crap out of his door. He sure as heck didn't break in according to this pic.

Uhhh huh. Good luck with that, Owens Corning.
 
And as such, since we do have doors that open out. And we have a type of protective glass that appears from this picture to have left little glass on the ground on either side. YET, we can still see in this same picture YOU provided that the majority of the glas is hanging OUTWARD. Pelosi's narrative and the observations of your picture do not mesh. This is Jessee Smollet part deaux. Nothing more than a mid-term stunt. Or unsatisfactory sex that led this "intruder" to beat the crap out of his door. He sure as heck didn't break in according to this pic.

I wouldn't put much stock into the fact the glass looks to be hanging out. The guy would have had to beat a hole in the glass and start pulling it out to make one that big.
 

VN Store



Back
Top