Paul Pelosi attacked in home invasion

#1,476
#1,476
whodeycin85 said:
Or sometime unstable people will do anything for those they love ..if that angle is real
Click to expand...

So the private security guy that saw DePape coming in… he’s an FBI agent that they just put undercover to help sell the story, or what?

The Capitol police security camera that supposedly recorded DePape jumping the fence that will have to be turned over to his attorney… made up? They got the attorney in on it, too?
 
#1,477
#1,477
RockyTop85 said:
So the private security guy that saw DePape coming in… he’s an FBI agent that they just put undercover to help sell the story, or what?

The Capitol police security camera that supposedly recorded DePape jumping the fence that will have to be turned over to his attorney… made up? They got the attorney in on it, too?
Click to expand...
Where are you seeing that info?
If a private security guy saw Depape and didn't do anything, that's strange....Also if it's on tape...release it and end the narrative
 
#1,478
#1,478
0nelilreb said:
So he lied after , not before , because he wasn’t crazy before , but is now ? Everyone that any news outlet has interviewed about him says exactly the same things .. he’s crazy and uses drugs . It wouldn’t make logical sense to put anymore emphasis on his first statement to cops , than his last in court .
Click to expand...
That is ignorant.

It makes perfect sense to conclude that he was telling the police an accurate version of events, before he had "lawyered up." This happens all the time. He did what most stupid people do. He cooperated with the police, before he had spoken with an attorney.
 
#1,479
#1,479
whodeycin85 said:
Where are you seeing that info?
If a private security guy saw Depape and didn't do anything, that's strange....Also if it's on tape...release it and end the narrative
Click to expand...
That was in the DOJ charging instrument’s affidavit.

And it’s not strange. DePape wasn’t bothering his principal.
 
#1,480
#1,480
0nelilreb said:
So he lied after , not before , because he wasn’t crazy before , but is now ? Everyone that any news outlet has interviewed about him says exactly the same things .. he’s crazy and uses drugs . It wouldn’t make logical sense to put anymore emphasis on his first statement to cops , than his last in court .
Click to expand...

You’re talking about his plea at arraignment?
 
#1,485
#1,485
BowlBrother85 said:
That is ignorant.

It makes perfect sense to conclude that he was telling the police an accurate version of events, before he had "lawyered up." This happens all the time. He did what most stupid people do. He cooperated with the police, before he had spoken with an attorney.
Click to expand...

Ignorance would be to assume that you can trust anything a bat sh!t crazy person that has been a heavy drug user for years has to say to anyone . That’s the logical way to approach this without a political slant or agenda .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, AM64 and NorthDallas40
#1,486
#1,486
This would be irrelevant event if not for the Dems using it as some "told you so about 9/11".

Heck..Call him a MAGA..WTH cares other than some pol point.

The list is endless whatever your ideology.
 
#1,488
#1,488
Orangeburst said:
This would be irrelevant event if not for the Dems using it as some "told you so about 9/11".

Heck..Call him a MAGA..WTH cares other than some pol point.

The list is endless whatever your ideology.
Click to expand...
It would have been irrelevant if people hadn’t tried to say it was something else. People have demanded more information to rule out gay sex and other bizarre theories so it has gotten more reporting.
 
#1,489
#1,489
Orangeburst said:
This would be irrelevant event if not for the Dems using it as some "told you so about 9/11".

Heck..Call him a MAGA..WTH cares other than some pol point.

The list is endless whatever your ideology.
Click to expand...
Yep a MAGA whom by their own admission supported the Green Party, is a progressive, has BLM and LBGTQ flags outside their home, is a nudist, and thinks election shenanigans occurred in 2020.

Using selective assignment of whatever piece of info you want you could assign this 🦇 💩 crazy guy to pretty much any political affiliation you want 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
#1,490
#1,490
Vol Main said:
What law prohibits peaceful demonstrations outside the residence of a USSC Justice? Please give me the statute and court decisions on that. Also, the statement is from the Press Secretary. She represents Biden, but she is not Biden. Furthermore, her statement supported peaceful demonstrations. She emphasized the right to demonstrate peacefully. That right is written into the U.S. Constitution. Are you trying to argue against it, or are you just spouting off with one of your recklessly inaccurate cheap shots?
Click to expand...

What laws allow anyone to trespass, block a thoroughfare, or create a disturbance that affects the rest of the neighborhood to deliver what the protestors consider "peaceful demonstration"? BTW, if you actually read the First Amendment and pay attention to the punctuation the phrase is this:

or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances
Click to expand...

That sounds far more like you have the right to peaceably assemble to address the Government than just any individual. Being the Pelosi home that's a blurred line, but disturbing neighbors and traffic isn't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#1,491
#1,491
RockyTop85 said:
It would have been irrelevant if people hadn’t tried to say it was something else. People have demanded more information to rule out gay sex and other bizarre theories so it has gotten more reporting.
Click to expand...

And none of those theories were political.
 
#1,496
#1,496
whodeycin85 said:
Is it normal not to name the witness in an affidavit??
Click to expand...
It is not uncommon for them to identify people like that. Trump was “individual 1” for a while. I don’t know what their guidelines are for that or whether it’s normal in this situation.
 
#1,497
#1,497
RockyTop85 said:
It is not uncommon for them to identify people like that. Trump was “individual 1” for a while. I don’t know what their guidelines are for that or whether it’s normal in this situation.
Click to expand...
Makes sense. I just thought it'd be more like Joe Schoom. Further more known as witness 1...type thing...just curious...still lots of questions...thanks for the info
 
#1,498
#1,498
Orangeburst said:
This would be irrelevant event if not for the Dems using it as some "told you so about 9/11".

Heck..Call him a MAGA..WTH cares other than some pol point.

The list is endless whatever your ideology.
Click to expand...
Republicans were just as eager to label David DePape a liberal Democrat, and score political points with "the chickens came home to roost" narrative that they know their base enjoys so much. Republicans wanted to make this story about the crime rates in "Democrat-run cities," while Democrats have wanted to make this story about the toxic political climate that Republicans have created with their combative rhetoric.

They are both divisive and wrong ... and we should be denouncing both of them equally; not just one without the other.
 
#1,500
#1,500
NorthDallas40 said:
He’s calling out your obsession with attaching this guy to the GOP and Jan 6 so you can do more of your stupid guilt by association stuff, “counselor”. Butt you knew that
Click to expand...

I don’t think his post had anything to do with that, but the fact that you went out of your way to bring that up is probably a sign that you shouldn’t criticize others for having obsessions.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top