Paul Pelosi attacked in home invasion

Yes, we have French doors that open out onto the back deck. The other 4 exterior doors are all singles that open in.

Doors that open in tend to be more weather resistant and can’t be blocked from the outside where you have less control over conditions.

But French doors and secondary or tertiary exits that also serve a design or aesthetic function can open out.
Inswing doors are easier to kick in.
Hinges on outswing doors do not have to be exposed, so if you want security, go outswing every time.
 
Yeah drug addicts are renowned for taking responsibility for all the things they did and even the things they didn’t do.

View attachment 510157

I see you are doing that lawyereez stuff again where you cherry pick what was said to try and make some point . 2 questions counselor.. 1) - was the words drug addict ever used in my post ? 2) why did you decide to use drug addict for your example instead of all the interviews of people that knew him , saying he was legit crazy to the point of proclaiming he was Jesus for a year ?
 
It’s not a tough sell when everybody else in the thread is talking about a subject that’s not me and you’re the only one talking about nothing but me.

You didn’t read the guy’s post history and instead of admitting you were wrong you admitted that there was absolutely nothing, including an admission from him, that would make you believe he was influenced by irresponsible partisan rhetoric from the right. I rubbed salt in it by pointing out that you were a bigger hack than all the libs who copped to Schumer being partly to blame for the Roske/Kavanaugh thing.

Now you’re back and instead of coming up with something clever and new, you’re talking about me. Booooooring.

But a little flattering. It’s nice to know that I got under your skin this bad with such minimal effort. But since you’re only the second saltiest person I’ve dealt with today, it’s still not worth much.
Holy cow that’s a lot of self absorption there cowboy. You asked a question. I answered it. You said I was wrong. The poster said I wasn’t. The rest back and forth has just been you trying to reconcile that.

Your turn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
Don’t know how we got to this point but here it goes .. we have one set of French double doors that open in . They are straight garbage and the biggest weak point besides one low living window that we have in this house . At least with the window it will take someone older than a 6 year old child to get in instantly .
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Inswing doors are easier to kick in.
Hinges on outswing doors do not have to be exposed, so if you want security, go outswing every time.

Inswing doors are safer in a lot of applications because if you are inside (exterior door or bedroom door for example) you can move obstacles blocking the door. You can be trapped the other way. I guess an intruder could grab an outswing door from your hands if you open it, but kicking a stout outswing door is definitely a whole different story.
 
I see you are doing that lawyereez stuff again where you cherry pick what was said to try and make some point . 2 questions counselor.. 1) - was the words drug addict ever used in my post ? 2) why did you decide to use drug addict for your example instead of all the interviews of people that knew him , saying he was legit crazy to the point of proclaiming he was Jesus for a year ?
You said heavy drug user, if you want to argue semantics about the distinction between a heavy user who lies all the time and an addict, then knock yourself out.
 
You said heavy drug user, if you want to argue semantics about the distinction between a heavy user who lies all the time and an addict, then knock yourself out.

I don’t argue semantics with a lawyer it’s like rolling around in the mud with a pig , only one of us will enjoy it . Nice side step of the 2nd question though counselor . 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
I don’t argue semantics with a lawyer it’s like rolling around in the mud with a pig , only one of us will enjoy it . Nice side step of the 2nd question though counselor . 😉

You really need the second one spelled out for you more than I already did? Ok:

You said heavy drug user to the point of lying all the time.

There you go.

Is there something of special significance in the articles that you didn’t link to that would have allowed me to distinguish this guy from the other mentally ill, drug abusing criminals that I’ve dealt with on a daily basis for the past decade?
 
You really need the second one spelled out for you more than I already did? Ok:

You said heavy drug user to the point of lying all the time.

There you go.

Is there something of special significance in the articles that you didn’t link to that would have allowed me to distinguish this guy from the other mentally ill, drug abusing criminals that I’ve dealt with on a daily basis for the past decade?

Have you dealt with many crazy ass people that are so far gone that they claim to be Jesus for a year ? Do regale us with your experiences in dealing with the mentally ill heavy drug users , and their propensities .. lawyer dude . Again what I said was , that it would be illogical to believe these types of people that have shall we say a handicap when it comes to normal brain cell functions . You yourself would be trying to convince the cops that he was out of his damn mind and shouldn’t be held accountable for his statement .
 
You have not explained what David DePape had to gain by confessing a version of events to the police which aligns perfectly with Paul Pelosi's. DePape is going to be facing hard time at either San Quentin or possibly even Folsom. San Quentin, in particular, has an incredibly high mortality rate for gay inmates. They are either killed in general population, or they kill themselves in administrative segregation, within the first 3 years of their incarceration. Why would DePape have made that story up that he gave to the police? His life will not be better off for it. That's for sure.

I guess Pelosi will be going to great lengths then to make sure it's DePape at SAn Quinten and not him.

He was promised things that are not gonig to come to fruition for him. That's life when you engage in a staged event. He can confess whatever the heck he wants. The circumstances and oddities are astounding. You can't get past a "confession". I can't get past a heavily guarded community he got past. I can't get past the cops not being called while a perp is struggling to bust in you safety glass door. Speaking of phone calls, who charges their phone in a downstairs bathroom? I can't get past a hammer beating that supposedly resulted in one or more blows to the head and Pelosi spent how long in the hospital. I can't get past several things that indicate there is a bucket of s*** at the footsteps of this and your being as unobjective as ever. Several articles of the facts of this case state DePape attacked Pelosi AFTER police arrived. Seriously Clark? Were the cops to make sure he didn't accidentally kill him when he attacked him, or injure him too badly.

If this attack is exactly what it is supposed to appear to be, then Pelosi has to be the most feeble and idiotic victim ever. The entire chain of events are such a cluster f*** it's hard to look at it without tilting you head and saying hold up just a sec.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64

VN Store



Back
Top