emainvol
Giver of Sexy
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2006
- Messages
- 22,538
- Likes
- 20
66,000 more tickets.
Do the math.
$9 a ticket? Are you sure? As I recall, a non-conference home game, except for probably Texas, was pretty cheap in 2007, but not that cheap. And, the SEC games cost more. Unless you're talking about the Lady Vols, I don't recall getting in for $9 for any game.
And, don't forget concessions. Buzz won't. LOL
Let's see......
In 2007 we had 16 home games. Luckily for SB in 2000 we had 16 home games as well as I don't know if he factored that in in more tickets sold argument.
66000/16 = 4125. So almost half of the amount of tickets sold as what SB said.
Ticket prices in 07 for upper deck seats were $9 a ticket. True UT fans know that lower deck seats, while empty, have not been available for years so we cannot use lower deck ticket costs. So, 66,000 times 9 = 594,000. (We'll not factor in student tickets in this which at the time were free and probably lowers the number down closer to the 60K range or lower of paid tickets.)
So 594,000 profit over 2000. I believe Green made somewhere in the 700K range in 2000 and Pearl made around $1.3 million in 07. So that's a 600K increase in salary. Ummmmmmm.........:unsure:
[/B]
Pearl, over the course of his 5 seasons has not only had a flash of brilliance like Green did for one season (as far as attendance goes), he has sustained that level of enthusiasm throughout the fanbase and the butts have been filling the seats throughout his tenure because of this.
In addition, the 600k difference in salary is relative to inflation and the overall increase in coaching salaries over the past decade (I challenge you to find a big time coach currently in the NCAA that is making 700k or less). By big time coach I mean a coach whose team has been in the NCAA Tournament 5 years in a row.
Also, the prices for the new luxury suites more than compensate for the salary that Pearl makes. I don't know how much each box costs, but to put it into perspective, the football boxes cost well over six figures per season.
Your argument that Pearl is overpaid and does the same job that Green did, but is costing us 600k more per year fails sir.
However, what would you pay a coach like Jerry Green right now? Pearl has had similar results and makes a lot more than 1.3 mil now.
[/B]
Pearl, over the course of his 5 seasons has not only had a flash of brilliance like Green did for one season (as far as attendance goes), he has sustained that level of enthusiasm throughout the fanbase and the butts have been filling the seats throughout his tenure because of this.
In addition, the 600k difference in salary is relative to inflation and the overall increase in coaching salaries over the past decade (I challenge you to find a big time coach currently in the NCAA that is making 700k or less). By big time coach I mean a coach whose team has been in the NCAA Tournament 5 years in a row.
Also, the prices for the new luxury suites more than compensate for the salary that Pearl makes. I don't know how much each box costs, but to put it into perspective, the football boxes cost well over six figures per season.
Your argument that Pearl is overpaid and does the same job that Green did, but is costing us 600k more per year fails sir.
At some point, people are going to have to get over the Green-Pearl analogies. Green lived off of the O'Neill's players and was fired before he sabotaged the program with recruiting players like Andy Ikeakor. He was a decent X and O guy, but had zero personality and his players quit on him because they hated him (There's not a chance in hell Pearl's kids lose to SW Missouri St. by 30) Pearl is on his fifth year and the trend appears to be on an upswing looking at recruiting, no Andy Ikeakors or even Brandon Crumps on the horizon.
Fact is, yes, Pearl is not the only guyy who could take the Vols to the Sweet 16, obviously. Regardless, he's done a fantastic job here and I don't see the point in getting The Grass is Greener syndrome. It's like having a great girlfriend and then dumping her because you think you can date a supermodel.
[/B]
Pearl, over the course of his 5 seasons has not only had a flash of brilliance like Green did for one season (as far as attendance goes), he has sustained that level of enthusiasm throughout the fanbase and the butts have been filling the seats throughout his tenure because of this.
In addition, the 600k difference in salary is relative to inflation and the overall increase in coaching salaries over the past decade (I challenge you to find a big time coach currently in the NCAA that is making 700k or less). By big time coach I mean a coach whose team has been in the NCAA Tournament 5 years in a row.
Also, the prices for the new luxury suites more than compensate for the salary that Pearl makes. I don't know how much each box costs, but to put it into perspective, the football boxes cost well over six figures per season.
Your argument that Pearl is overpaid and does the same job that Green did, but is costing us 600k more per year fails sir.
Nobody is talking about getting rid of him just to get rid of him. If Iowa makes a run at him it will have to be at least 3 Mil and he's simply not worth it.
I seriously doubt that we would have to fork over $3 million. Fans always overstate what their school can afford and I can't see Iowa, of all places, forcing us into a decision to make Pearl the second highest paid coach in America.
However, there is a sentiment on this board by a few that losing Pearl wouldn't be that big a deal, we'd just find one of the dozens of coaches who could do exactly the same thing Pearl has/could do at UT. It's baloney, coaches who average 25 wins a year don't grow on trees.
I seriously doubt that we would have to fork over $3 million. Fans always overstate what their school can afford and I can't see Iowa, of all places, forcing us into a decision to make Pearl the second highest paid coach in America.
However, there is a sentiment on this board by a few that losing Pearl wouldn't be that big a deal, we'd just find one of the dozens of coaches who could do exactly the same thing Pearl has/could do at UT. It's baloney, coaches who average 25 wins a year don't grow on trees.
First, Bruce has done the heavy lifting, so it doesn't have to be done again. Getting our AD committed to hoops and getting our fanbase to prove it's merited was a big deal. We don't need it again. Our university now knows we will support basketball in a big way.
Second, the number of 25 game winners this year is probably 40+.
Posted via VolNation Mobile