Penn State scandal (merged)

#3,278
#3,278
I can't believe.. you would just witness and let that happen. what kind of man are you? I'm 17 years old. And even if the dude who was doing the molesting was 5x bigger than me, I would put up a fight.. That sht is ridicolous. Disgusting.

And to think he will be coaching saturday.. lmao.
 
#3,279
#3,279
Oldvol75 said:
What about the reports coming out now that the original DA in 1999 that started an investagation went missing before he could get it started?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

He got it started and decided not enough info to prosecute. Someone on here had an interesting theory earlier.
 
#3,280
#3,280
allvol123 said:
It boggles my mind that someone can defend the inaction by the adults in this program.
Click to expand...

It shouldn't. If the individuals involved thought it was ok, surely there are other sick people that see nothing wrong with them knowing and hiding it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#3,281
#3,281
Oldvol75 said:
But why? Is what we know now just the tip of a massive iceberg?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Yep, cover up, conspiracy, widespread abuse of children growing at warp speed, blackmail, murder, and the strong potential of child trafficking. All entirely possible.

Oh yeah, and Paterno was running the whole operation. LOL
 
Last edited:
#3,284
#3,284
pl3 said:
It shouldn't. If the individuals involved thought it was ok, surely there are other sick people that see nothing wrong with them knowing and hiding it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

I don't even think u really know how to read.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#3,285
#3,285
CountVolcula said:
We let alot of people go that we know are guilty, but at the time, dont have enough evidence. Once we investigate further and uncover more leads, and interview more witness, then we feel confident taking the case to the Grand Jury.

Doesnt mean he wasnt guilty when the Police released him the first time
Click to expand...

Ei incumbit probatio, qui dicit, non qui negat; cum per rerum naturam factum negantis probatio nulla sit.

So much for the presumption of innocence...
 
#3,288
#3,288
hmanvolfan said:
I based my response to your post on the tenor which I believed to be that since he hasn't been convicted or registered yet that you think all the action that has been taken is unfair and you shouldn't convict somebody in a public forum. If I got that wrong I'm sorry but throughout this whole affair a lot of the people defending the actions or innocence of the parties involved have completely forgotten about the victims in this case. And I agree the GA should have been fired and prosecuted along with everybody else that had knowledge of these heinous acts and didn't notify law enforcement.
Click to expand...

My opinion is primarily based off of the fact that this GA is still employed. It seems like a ridiculous double standard and doesn't make sense. The GA should have been fired way before Joe Pa if the issue is moral obligation. While joe Pa got a 58 on the exam the GA got a 20%. And the GA is still there. That's messed up.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#3,292
#3,292
utvols88 said:
My opinion is primarily based off of the fact that this GA is still employed. It seems like a ridiculous double standard and doesn't make sense. The GA should have been fired way before Joe Pa if the issue is moral obligation. While joe Pa got a 58 on the exam the GA got a 20%. And the GA is still there. That's messed up.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

It is also messed up that if McQueary saw Sandusky raping a boy, he continued to work in an environment in which Sandusky was constantly around. McQueary had the proof of his own observation (truth); Paterno only had McQueary's report (defeasible).
 
#3,294
#3,294
Vols520 said:
I don't even think u really know how to read.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

I like TRUT and have people like him surround me when planning MOP's because he brings competitive viewpoints that I may or may not have considered.

Consider that when you make a statement that makes you look like some high school kid trying to impress by talking out your ass.
 
#3,295
#3,295
Vols520 said:
I don't even think u really know how to read.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Read this: anyone that defends the cover up from those in the know and thinks anyone involved acted in an ethical manner is a sick bastard and needs help. Forum arguments are one thing. Downright idiocy needs to be addressed.

Do you understand my stance?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#3,296
#3,296
therealUT said:
Ei incumbit probatio, qui dicit, non qui negat; cum per rerum naturam factum negantis probatio nulla sit.

So much for the presumption of innocence...
Click to expand...

Do you even have a clue what you are talking about?

I dont go into a murder case trying to prove the innocence of the person. I try to show why the murder was committed, how it was committed, who committed it and why they committed it.
 
#3,298
#3,298
CountVolcula said:
Do you even have a clue what you are talking about?

I dont go into a murder case trying to prove the innocence of the person. I try to show why the murder was committed, how it was committed, who committed it and why they committed it.
Click to expand...

Cops lie on stand all the time. Sure you're no different.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top