Orangepantsforever
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2019
- Messages
- 495
- Likes
- 914
It started with the OBannon brothers back in the 90’s and escalated from there through the courts. And yes it escalated with fans, media takes and players calling themselves gladiators competing for enjoyment. Fans don’t like being pointed at and yes, congress isn’t the answer.
True, but like the quote in Office Space (paraphrased), you do just enough not to get fired. But in this case, the players hold all of the cards. They can’t get fired.Winning and money go hand in hand.
I tend to point to the NCAA v Oklahoma case that turned the media money spigot on high to the various schools and conferences and started all the realignment and race to get the biggest TV contracts.It started with the OBannon brothers back in the 90’s and escalated from there through the courts. And yes it escalated with fans, media takes and players calling themselves gladiators competing for enjoyment. Fans don’t like being pointed at and yes, congress isn’t the answer.
Yes, the Pell Grant. Nice. A lot were getting those because of their family income, but most weren't getting it. Those from middle class weren't getting them. Especially in my time in college. I knew some non athletes who got them and lived better than their parents. Hey, it's great to have tuition, room, books and food provided. Don't get me wrong, but not having the ability to spring for anything else is troublesome when the organization is making far more from your likeness than they're paying for your scholarshipPell grant opportunities helped blunt the part time job. The part time job was to stop the Rhett Bomar deals for players, little to no work for over compensation by businesses. I have no issue with a kid receiving 100% paid tuition forfeiting their rights of jersey purchases. I do agree, they need a better plan then a free for all.
Piece of that is the ability to be seen on TV. Better amenities/facilities and avenues for better professional career in the league or area of academic. No doubt Tennessee athletes are in a much better situation than UTC/TN Tech/ETSU because of how profitable the SEC and Tennessee is.I tend to point to the NCAA v Oklahoma case that turned the media money spigot on high to the various schools and conferences and started all the realignment and race to get the biggest TV contracts.
That made having a really good team or conference VERY profitable vs conferences without good teams. The more money the schools made, the more the players felt like....... Hmm, shouldn't we get a piece of that?
The NCAA v. Oklahoma turns 40: Looking back at the lawsuit that changed who controls college sports on TV
Jon Wilner's Pac-12 Hotline: The NCAA v. Oklahoma turns 40: Looking back at the lawsuit that changed who controls college sports on TV.tucson.com
That's one way to see it and I know a lot of musicians who get offered to "play for exposure" and "we have a sound guy to set you up" and feel free to put a tip jar at the front of the stage, but no..... we can't afford to pay you.Piece of that is the ability to be seen on TV. Better amenities/facilities and avenues for better professional career in the league or area of academic. No doubt Tennessee athletes are in a much better situation than UTC/TN Tech/ETSU because of how profitable the SEC and Tennessee is.
I'm unsure about being able to easily prove "fraud" unless they get some text or email discovery of the player saying they were going to "ride it out."
I've wondered that about pro players who seem to go really hard until they sign that big contract, then they're suddenly only mediocre.
I KNOW that academics will publish, present papers, etc until they get tenure then proof.... they never do significant research or publish again.
It's not unheard of I agree, but if a person knows they are leaving they are not 100% mentally into the game. And football is as much mental as physical. Milton had all the physical ability, but slow making decisions, that's mental. Nico up to this point appears to be slow in making decisions. Not meaning that either of these two are not intelligent. A person can be very intelligent, but slower in their thinking.It's a tough spot. Fans are not happy with guys like Nimrod for leaving before the playoffs, then they're not happy with guys who finish out the year knowing they'll hit the portal also.
In the business world people often have a job lined up with a new employer while still working out a notice or training/transitioning an employee to replace them. It's not unheard of at all.
Every guy who entered the portal that would have earned meaningful playing time and not just be a tackling dummy is quitter and shamefully for sale to the highest bidder. Greed and the NCAA ruins everything in the end. The quality of this game is only going to suffer until it’s ultimately unwatchableYeah heard a similar thing from the Volquest guys. Whoever it is, at least they stuck it out and played unlike the guys who quit on the team before a playoff game
Let's think about it another way. Before the bowl game, Heupel was said to be having interviews with players and some of those players were probably told that it would be best for them to move on. Some guys hit the portal and got called quitters because "they abandoned the team without finishing what they started."It's not unheard of I agree, but if a person knows they are leaving they are not 100% mentally into the game. And football is as much mental as physical. Milton had all the physical ability, but slow making decisions, that's mental. Nico up to this point appears to be slow in making decisions. Not meaning that either of these two are not intelligent. A person can be very intelligent, but slower in their thinking.
Judkins entered the portal last year and 2 days later was committ to OSU and he did it in January after the bowl, not the first opening in Dec. I’m sure he didn’t have a deal in place with OSU immediately upon announcement.Ohio State didn't have that problem, sounds like it was just our problem. Seems like SEC teams have struggled more with this, Alabama is having similar issues.
Maybe not the popular opinion but I'd rather not have someone who has a foot halfway out the door over a guy who is fully investedYeah heard a similar thing from the Volquest guys. Whoever it is, at least they stuck it out and played unlike the guys who quit on the team before a playoff game
Let's think about it another way. Before the bowl game, Heupel was said to be having interviews with players and some of those players were probably told that it would be best for them to move on. Some guys hit the portal and got called quitters because "they abandoned the team without finishing what they started."
Maybe others got told that they should move on and didn't enter the portal. Did some of them take snaps knowing coach didn't really want them anymore? I don't know but regardless that's the team abandoning the player, isn't it?
We see PLENTY of examples where a coach is no longer all in on a player or many people keep saying "Coach Heupel doesn't trust Nico" and if that's true of course those players are no longer going to buy in 100% also if it seems your coach doesn't believe in you.
My point: it's not just the players who check out on the situation. Sometimes the coach checks out on a player too and causes less performance.
Looked at the portal a little while ago.Every guy who entered the portal that would have earned meaningful playing time and not just be a tackling dummy is quitter and shamefully for sale to the highest bidder. Greed and the NCAA ruins everything in the end. The quality of this game is only going to suffer until it’s ultimately unwatchable